Skip to main content

Idioms Modeling in a Computer Ontology as a Morphosyntactic Disambiguation Strategy

The Case of Tibetan Corpus of Grammar Treatises

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Text, Speech, and Dialogue (TSD 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11107))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The article presents the experience of developing computer ontology as one of the tools for Tibetan idioms processing. A computer ontology that contains a consistent specification of meanings of lexical units with different relations between them represents a model of lexical semantics and both syntactic and semantic valencies, reflecting the Tibetan linguistic picture of the world. The article presents an attempt to classify Tibetan idioms, including compounds, which are idiomatized clips of syntactic groups that have frozen inner syntactic relations and are often characterized by omission of grammatical morphemes; and the application of this classification for idioms processing in computer ontology. The article also proposes methods of using computer ontology for avoiding idioms processing ambiguity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Following the definition of Krippendorf, combinatorial explosion is understood here as a situation “when a huge number of possible combinations are created by increasing the number of entities which can be combined” [4]. As applied to parsing, these are cases of exponential growth in the number of parsing versions as the length of the parsed text and, thus, the amount of its parsed ambiguous fragments increase.

  2. 2.

    These 3 interpretations represent 3 groups of versions that arose only because of incorrect combinations of adjuncts, each group consisting of 18 versions (2 for ring-lugs, multiplied by 3 for dpal-yon and by 3 for mdzes-chos rig-pa). Thus, the total amount was 54.

  3. 3.

    Example (9) has 32 versions of parsing. These 3 interpretations represent groups of versions that arose only because of incorrect designating of subject for the verb bsu ‘to invite’.

References

  1. Grokhovskii, P.L., Zakharov, V.P., Smirnova, M.O., Khokhlova, M.V.: The corpus of tibetan grammatical works. In: Automatic documentation and mathematical linguistics, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 182–191 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0005105515050064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications (PDF). Knowl. Acquis. 5(2), 199–220 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1006/knac.1993.1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aho, A.V., Corasick, M.J.: Efficient string matching: an aid to bibliographic search. Commun. ACM 18(6), 333–340 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Krippendorff, K.: Combinatorial Explosion. Web Dictionary of Cybernetics and Systems. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/ASC/Combin_explo.html. PRINCIPIA CYBERNETICA WEB

  5. Dobrov, A.V.: Semantic and ontological relations in AIIRE natural language processor. Comput. Model. Bus. Eng. Domains. Rzeszow-Sofia: ITHEA, 147–157 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miller, G.A., Beckwith, R., Fellbaum, C.D., Gross, D., Miller, K.: WordNet: an online lexical database. Int. J. Lexicograph. 3(4), 235–244 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Melcuk, I.: Phrasemes in language and phraseology in linguistics. In: Everaert, M., Van der Linden, E.J., Schenk, A., Schreuder, R. (eds.) Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives, pp. 167–232. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pelletier, F.J.: The principle of semantic compositionality. Topoi 13, 11 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Beyer, S.: The Classical Tibetan Language. State University of New York, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Grant No. 16-06-00578 Morphosyntactycal analyser of texts in the Tibetan language.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Smirnova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dobrov, A., Dobrova, A., Grokhovskiy, P., Smirnova, M., Soms, N. (2018). Idioms Modeling in a Computer Ontology as a Morphosyntactic Disambiguation Strategy. In: Sojka, P., Horák, A., Kopeček, I., Pala, K. (eds) Text, Speech, and Dialogue. TSD 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11107. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00794-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00794-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00793-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00794-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics