Skip to main content

Do We Need Word Sense Disambiguation for LCM Tagging?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Text, Speech, and Dialogue (TSD 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11107))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1358 Accesses

Abstract

Observing the current state of natural language processing, especially in the Polish language, one notices that sense-level dictionaries are becoming increasingly popular. For instance, the largest manually annotated sentiment dictionary for Polish is now based on plWordNet (the Polish WordNet) [13], also the Polish Linguistic Category Model (LCM-PL) [10] dictionary has its significant part annotated on sense level. Our paper addresses the important question: what is the influence of word sense disambiguation in real-world scenarios and how it compares to the simpler baseline of labeling using just the tag of the most frequent sense. We evaluate both approaches on data sets compiled for studies on fake opinion detection and predicting levels of self-esteem in the area of social psychology. Our conclusion is that the baseline method vastly outperforms its competitor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Our data sets have been processed in March 2018. We have no information about version of the WSD module available at that time, including no information on potential open bugs that might influence sense annotation.

  2. 2.

    The study was conducted by members of the Warsaw Evaluative Learning Lab headed by professor Robert Balas.

References

  1. Beukeboom, C., Tanis, M., Vermeulen, I.: The language of extraversion: extraverted people talk more abstractly, introverts are more concrete. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 32(2), 191–201 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoorens, V.: What’s really in a name-letter effect? Name-letter preferences as indirect measures of self-esteem. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 25(1), 228–262 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kędzia, P., Piasecki, M., Orlińska, M.: Word sense disambiguation based on large scale Polish Clarin heterogeneous lexical resources. Cogn. Stud. 15, 269–292 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robins, R.W., Hendin, H.M., Trzesniewski, K.H.: Measuring global self-esteem: construct validation of a single-item measure and the rosenberg self-esteem scale. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 27(2), 151–161 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rubikowski, M., Wawer, A.: The scent of deception: recognizing fake perfume reviews in polish. In: Kłopotek, M.A., Koronacki, J., Marciniak, M., Mykowiecka, A., Wierzchoń, S.T. (eds.) IIS 2013. LNCS, vol. 7912, pp. 45–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38634-3_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Rubini, M., Sigall, H.: Taking the edge off of disagreement: linguistic abstractness and self-presentation to a heterogeneous audience. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 32(3), 343–351 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Semin, G.R., Fiedler, K.: The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: social cognition and language. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54(4), 558 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, E.R., Mackie, D.M., Claypool, H.M.: Social Psychology. Psychology Press, Hove (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Wawer, A., Ogrodniczuk, M.: Results of the PolEval 2017 competition: sentiment analysis shared task. In: 8th Language and Technology Conference: Human Language Technologies as a Challenge for Computer Science and Linguistics (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wawer, A., Sarzyńska, J.: The linguistic category model in polish (LCM-PL). In: Chair, N.C.C., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Paris, France, May 2018

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wigboldus, D.H., Semin, G.R., Spears, R.: How do we communicate stereotypes? Linguistic bases and inferential consequences. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78(1), 5 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Youyou, W., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D.: Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112(4), 1036–1040 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zaśko-Zielińska, M., Piasecki, M., Szpakowicz, S.: A large wordnet-based sentiment lexicon for Polish. In: Proceedings of the International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, pp. 721–730. INCOMA Ltd., Shoumen, BULGARIA, Hissar, Bulgaria, September 2015. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/R15-1092

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleksander Wawer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wawer, A., Sarzyńska, J. (2018). Do We Need Word Sense Disambiguation for LCM Tagging?. In: Sojka, P., Horák, A., Kopeček, I., Pala, K. (eds) Text, Speech, and Dialogue. TSD 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11107. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00794-2_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00794-2_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00793-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00794-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics