Skip to main content

Process and Workflow

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Software Engineering

Abstract

Processes govern every aspect of software development and every aspect of application usage. Whether trivial, complex, formal, or ad hoc, processes are pervasive in software engineering. This chapter summarizes a variety of ways in which process models, also referred to as workflows, can be used to achieve significant improvements in a range of different disciplines. The chapter starts with a brief summary of the evolution of this approach over the past century. It then identifies some principal ways in which important advantages can be obtained from exploiting process models and process technology. The chapter goes on to specify key criteria for evaluating process modeling approaches, suggesting the different kinds of modeling approaches that seem particularly effective for supporting different uses. A representative set of examples of current process modeling approaches, and different ways in which process modeling is being used to good advantage, is then described. These examples are then used to suggest some key research challenges that need to be met in order for society to obtain a large range of further advantages from the continued development of process and process modeling technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andrews, T., Curbera, F., Dholakia, H., Goland, Y., Klein, J., Leymann, F., Liu, K., Roller, D., Smith, D., Thatte, S., et al.: Business process execution language for web services. IBM, Microsoft, and others (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Armbrust, O., Berlage, T., Hanne, T., Lang, P., Münch, J., Neu, H., Nickel, S., Rus, I., Sarishvill, A., van Stockum, S., et al.: Simulation-based software process modeling and evaluation. In: Handbook of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering: Vol 3: Recent Advances, pp. 333–364. World Scientific (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, K.: Embracing change with extreme programming. Computer 32, 70–77 (1999). Beck, K. Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison-Wesley Professional (2000a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, K.: Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison-Wesley Professional (2000b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, K., et al.: Agile manifesto (2001). http://agilemanifesto.org (accessed January 10, 2018)

  • Beecham, S., et al.: Using agile practices to solve global software development problems – a case study. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineeering Workshops (ICGSEW), IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner-Wickner, M., et al.: Execution support for agenda-driven case management. Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner-Wickner, M., et al.: Process mining for knowledge-intensive business processes. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Knowledge Technologies and Data-driven Business. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, B.W.: A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Computer. 21, 61–72 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, B.: Get ready for agile methods, with care. Computer. 35, 64–69 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, B., Lane, J.A., Koolmanojwong, S., Turner, R.: The Incremental Commitment Spiral Model: Principles and Practices for Successful Systems and Software. Addison-Wesley Professional (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • BPM Conferences. http://bpm-conference.org

  • BPM Newsletters. https://bpm-conference.org/BpmConference/Newsletter

  • Clarke Jr., E.M., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.A.: Model Checking. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, L.A., Avrunin, G.S., Osterweil, L.J.: Using Software Engineering Technology to Improve the Quality of Medical Processes, ACM SIGSOFT/IEEE Companion 30th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’08), pp. 889–898, Leipzig, Germany, May 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J.E., Wolf, A.L.: Automating process discovery through event-data analysis. ICSE. 95, 73–82 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • David, R. et al.: Discrete, continuous, and hybrid petri nets. Springer Science & Business Media – Technology and Engineering (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming, W.E.: Out of the Crisis. MIT Press, Cambridge (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRemer, F., Kron, H.H.: Programming-in-the-large versus programming-in-the-small. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 2, 80–86 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Diebold, P., Dahlem, M.: Agile practices in practice: a mapping study. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebold, P., et al. What do practitioners vary in using scrum?. International Conference on Agile Software Development. Springer, Cham (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • DOD-STD-2167, Military Standard: Defense System Software Development] (PDF). United States Department of Defense. 29 Feb 1988. Accessible through http://everyspec.com/DoD/DoD-STD/DOD-STD-2167_278/

  • DOD-STD-2167A, Military Standard: Defense System Software Development] (PDF). United States Department of Defense. 29 Feb 1988. Accessible through http://everyspec.com/DoD/DoD-STD/DOD-STD-2167A_8470/

  • Ellis, C.A., Nutt, G.J.: Office information systems and computer science. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR). 12, 27–60 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C.A., Gibbs, S.J.: Concurrency control in groupware systems. In: Acm Sigmod Record, pp. 399–407. ACM (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C.A., Gibbs, S.J., Rein, G.: Groupware: Some issues and experiences. Communications of the ACM. 34, 39–58 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericson, C.A.: Fault tree analysis. In: Hazard Analysis Techniques for System Safety, pp. 183–221. Wiley Online Library (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J.W. (1961): Industrial dynamics. Pegasus Communications. ISBN:1-883823-36-6 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanssen, G.K., Westerheim, H., Bjørnson, F.O.: Using rational unified process in an SME–a case study. European Conference on Software Process Improvement. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Highsmith, J., Cockburn, A.: Agile software development: The business of innovation. Computer. 34, 120–127 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, D.: Workflow Management Coalition. The Workflow Reference Model WFMC-TC-1003, 19-Jan-1995

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, W.S.: Managing the Software Process. SEI Series in Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. ISBN 0-201-18095-2 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM.:https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/content/03July/1000/1251/1251_bestpractices_TP026B.pdf (accessed February 13, 2018)

  • Indulska, M., Green, P., Recker, J., Rosemann, M.: Business process modeling: Perceived benefits. International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, pp. 458–471. Springer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • ISPW 1: Colin Potts. Proceedings of a Software Process Workshop, February 1984, IEEE Computer Society, Egham, UK (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M.A.: Principles of Program Design. Academic Press, New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaakkola, H., et al.: Modeling the requirements engineering process. In: Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases V: Principles and Formal Techniques, p. 85. IOS Press (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Juran, J.: Quality Control Handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruchten, P.: The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction. Addison-Wesley Professional (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Little-JIL 1.5 Language Report. Laboratory for Advanced Software Engineering Research, Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, MA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Murata, T.: Petri nets: Properties, analysis and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, pp. 541–580. IEEE 1989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • OMG: http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/

  • Osterweil, L.: Software processes are software too. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 2–13. IEEE Computer Society Press (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterweil, L.J.: Formalisms to Support the Definition of Processes. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 24(2), 198–211 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterweil, L.J., Bishop, M., Conboy, H., Phan, H., Simidchieva, B.I., Avrunin, G., Clarke, L.A., Peisert, S.: Iterative analysis to improve key properties of critical human-intensive processes: An election security example. ACM Trans. Priv. Secur. (TOPS), 20(2), 5:1–31 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parnas, D.L.: On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Commun. ACM. 15, 1053–1058 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulk, M.C., Weber, C.V., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B. (1995). The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. SEI Series in Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. ISBN 0-201-54664-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Petri, C.A.: Kommunikation mit automaten (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Phan, H.T.: An incremental approach to identifying causes of system failures using fault tree analysis. Doctoral Dissertation, College of Information and Computer Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, May 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Raunak, M.S., Osterweil, L.J.: Resource management for complex dynamic environments. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 39(3), 384–402 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, D.T., Schoman Jr., K.E.: Structured analysis for requirements definition. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. 1, 6–15 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royce, W.W.: (1970): Managing the development of large software systems. Proceedings of IEEE WESCON 26 (August), pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Royce, W.W.: Managing the development of large software systems: concepts and techniques. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 328–338. IEEE Computer Society Press (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaber, K.: Scrum development process. In Business Object Design and Implementation, pp. 117–134. Springer (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shewhart, W.A.: Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product. D. Van Nostrand Co. (1931)

    Google Scholar 

  • Simulink. https://www.mathworks.com/products/simulink.html

  • Studio. http://www.powersim.com/main/products-services/powersim_products/

  • Taylor, F.W.: The Principles of Scientific Management. Harper and Bros, New York (1911)

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Aalst, W.M.P., Hofstede, T., Arthur, H.M.: YAWL: Yet another workflow language. Inf. Syst. 30, 245–275 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VersionOne. 7th Annual State of Agile Development Survey (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, A., Cass, A.G., Lerner, B.S., McCall, E.K., Osterweil, L.J., Sutton, S.M.: Using Little-JIL to coordinate agents in software engineering. In: Proceedings ASE 2000. The Fifteenth IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, pp. 155–163. IEEE, (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M., Yan, H.: Simulation in software engineering with system dynamics: A case study. J. Softw. 4(10), 1127–1135 (2009)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., Kitchenham, B.A., Pfahl, D.: Software process simulation modeling: An extended systematic review. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Process, pp. 309–320. Springer (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leon J. Osterweil .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Osterweil, L.J., Gruhn, V., Schwenzfeier, N. (2019). Process and Workflow. In: Cha, S., Taylor, R., Kang, K. (eds) Handbook of Software Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00262-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00262-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00261-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00262-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics