Skip to main content

Where’s the Equity for Women Entrepreneurs?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 642 Accesses

Abstract

In earlier chapters, EDP data showed the effects that impact-oriented accelerators have on the short-term commercial performance of participating ventures. The focus tightened in Chap. 9 to look at differences between emerging markets and high-income countries, highlighting the specific challenges associated with accelerating early-stage ventures in less robust ecosystems. This chapter shifts focus again to home in on a group of entrepreneurs whose potential and performance tend to be under-appreciated: women. More specifically, EDP data are used to illuminate the issues that women entrepreneurs face when it comes to attracting outside equity investment. Roughly half of the ventures in the sample report at least one woman among their top three founders, most on mixed-gender founding teams. A look at outside equity investment across three groups of ventures—founded by men, mixed-gender teams, and women—reveals a troubling cascade that favors men. The ensuing analyses show that this cascade is not fully explained by obvious venture or entrepreneur differences across the three groups. The chapter closes by showing that accelerators may not be as helpful as many would hope when it comes to addressing inequities faced by women entrepreneurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   27.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Claudia Goldin & Cecilia Rouse. 2000. ‘Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians.’ American Economic Review, 90(4): 715–741.

  2. 2.

    Helene Ahl. 2006. ‘Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions.’ Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5): 595–621.

  3. 3.

    For instance, companies led by women tend to be smaller but are no more likely to go out of business. See Arnold C. Cooper, Javier Gimeno-Gascon & Carolyn Y. Woo. 1994. ‘Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance.’ Journal of Business Venturing, 9(5): 371–395; Arne L. Kalleberg & Kevin T. Leicht. 1991. ‘Gender and organizational performance: Determinants of small business survival and success.’ Academy of Management Journal, 34(1): 136–161.

  4. 4.

    More and More, Women are Combining Profit with Purpose to Create a Better World. CNBC Online (May 2017).

  5. 5.

    Post C., Rahman N., & Rubow E. 2011. Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 50: 189–223; Marquis C. & Lee, M. 2013. Who is governing whom? Executives, governance, and the structure of generosity in large U.S. firms. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 483–497.

  6. 6.

    Matsa, D. A., & Miller, A. R. 2014. Workforce reductions at women-owned businesses in the United States. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 67: 422–452.

  7. 7.

    Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. 2009. Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47: 448–474.

  8. 8.

    See https://rimidi.com/company/

  9. 9.

    Rimidi Closes $6.575 Million Series A with Strategic Investment from Eli Lilly. PR Newswire (July 2018).

  10. 10.

    Andy Cosh, Douglas Cumming & Alan Hughes. 2009. ‘Outside entrepreneurial capital.’ The Economic Journal, 119(540): 1494–1533.

  11. 11.

    Susan Coleman & Alica Robb. 2009. ‘A comparison of new firm financing by gender: evidence from the Kauffman Firm Survey data.’ Small Business Economics, 33(4): 397.

  12. 12.

    Gry Agnete Alsos, Espen John Isaksen & Elisabet Ljunggren. 2006. ‘New venture financing and subsequent business growth in men- and women-led businesses.’ Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5): 667–686.

  13. 13.

    Susan Marlow & Dean Patton. 2005. ‘All credit to men? Entrepreneurship, finance, and gender.’ Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(6): 717–735.

  14. 14.

    Patricia G. Greene, Candida G. Brush, Myra M. Hart & Patrick Saparito. 2001. ‘Patterns of venture capital funding: Is gender a factor?’ Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 3, 63–83; Candida Brush, Patricia Greene, Lakshmi Balachandra & Amy Davis. 2017 ‘The gender gap in venture capital- progress, problems, and perspectives.’ Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 20.

  15. 15.

    Why VCs Aren’t Funding Women-led Startups. Knowledge @ Wharton (May 2016).

  16. 16.

    Diana Report – Women Entrepreneurs 2014: Bridging the Gender Gap in Venture Capital, Babson College (2014).

  17. 17.

    Female Founders On an Upward Trend, According to CrunchBase, TechCrunch (May 2015).

  18. 18.

    See https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/equity

  19. 19.

    Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: United States Report 2016, Babson College (2017).

  20. 20.

    Maria Minniti & Carlo Nardone. 2007. ‘Being in someone else’s shoes: the role of gender in nascent entrepreneurship.’ Small Business Economics, 28(2): 223–238.

  21. 21.

    The 2015 Kauffman Index of Startup Activity: National Trends. The Kauffman Foundation (2015).

  22. 22.

    See https://www.nawbo.org/resources/women-business-owner-statistics

  23. 23.

    See https://blog.dol.gov/2017/07/05/get-facts-women-business-owners

  24. 24.

    Ingrid Verheul & Roy Thurik. 2001. ‘Start-up capital: Does gender matter?’. Small Business Economics, 16(4): 329–346.

  25. 25.

    Their research team examined each of these eight myths, showing many to be either outright wrong or undergoing substantial change. See Candida G. Brush, Nancy M. Carter, Elizabeth Gatewood, Patricia G. Greene and Myra M. Hart. 2008. The Diana Project: Women Business Owners and Equity Capital: The Myths Dispelled. Working paper.

  26. 26.

    Diana Report – Women Entrepreneurs 2014: Bridging the Gender Gap in Venture Capital, Babson College (2014).

  27. 27.

    Diana Report – Women Entrepreneurs 2014: Bridging the Gender Gap in Venture Capital, Babson College (2014).

  28. 28.

    Creating Inclusive High-Tech Incubators and Accelerators: Strategies to Increase Participation Rates of Women and Minority Entrepreneurs. JP Morgan Chase & ICIC (2016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Roberts, P.W., Lall, S.A. (2019). Where’s the Equity for Women Entrepreneurs?. In: Observing Acceleration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00042-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics