Skip to main content

Return On Contribution (ROC): A Metric for Enterprise Social Software

  • Conference paper
ECSCW 2009

Abstract

The value of enterprise social media applications, components, and users is difficult to quantify in formal economic terms such as Return On Investment. In this work we propose a different approach, based on human service to other humans. We describe a family of metrics, Return On Contribution (ROC), to assist in managing social software systems. ROC focuses on human collaboration, namely the creation and consumption of information and knowledge among employees. We show how ROC can be used to track the performance of several types of social media applications, and how ROC can help to understand the usage patterns of items within those applications, and the performance of employees who use those applications. Design implications include the importance of “lurkers” in organizational knowledge exchange, and specific types of measurements that may be of value to employees, managers, and system administrators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ames, M. & Naaman, M. (2007). ‘Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media.’ Proc. CHI2007, ACM Press, San Jose, CA, USA, April 2007, 971–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curien, N, Fauchart, E., Laffond, G. & Moreau, F. (2006). ‘Online consumer communities: Escaping the tragedy of the digital commons.’ In E. Brousseau (Ed)., Internet and Digital Economic,. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMicco, J., Millen, D.R., Geyer, W.G., Dugan, C Brownholtz, B., & Midler, M.J. (2008). ‘Motivations for social networking at work.’ Proc CSCW 2008, ACM Press, Banff, AL. Canada, November 2008, 711–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freyne, J., & Smyth, B. (2006), ‘Cooperating search communities.’ Proc Adapt. Hypermedia & Adapt. Web-Based Systems, Springer, 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M., (2007) ‘Social media ROL’ http://socialmediagroup.ca/2007/ll/13/social-media-roi/, 13 November 2007.

  • Howlett, D. (2007). ‘“ROI is so Business 1.0: not.”’ http://blogs.zdnet.com/Howlett/?p=183, 1 Oct 2007.

  • Kollock, P., & Smith, M. (1996). ‘Managing the virtual commons: Cooperation and conflict in computer communities.’ In S. Herring (ed.), Computer–Mediated Communications: Linguistic, Social, & Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins (1996), 109–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millen, D.R., Feinberg, J., & Kerr, B. (2006). ‘Dogear: Social bookmarking in the enterprise.’ Proc CHI 2006, ACM Press, Montreal, QU, Canada, April 2006, 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, M.J., Millen, D.R., & Feinberg, J. (2009). ‘Information curators in an enterprise file- sharing service. Proc ECSCW 2009, Springer-Verlag, Vienna, Austria, Sep. 2009, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll, M.G., & Meinel, C (2007)..Authors vs. readers — A comparative study of document metadata and content in the WWW.' Proc. DocEng'07, ACM Press, Winnipeg, MA, Canada, August 2007, 177–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2001). ‘Lurker demographics: Counting the silent.’ Proc CHI 2000. ACM Press, Den Hague, Nederlands, April 2000, 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirolli, P., Information Foraging Theory: Adaptive Interaction with Information. New York: Oxford, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleem, M. (2008). ‘Social media marketing ROI — Metrics and analytics.’ http://searchengineland.com/080826-123600.php, 26 August 2008.

  • Takahashi, M., Fujimoto, M., & Yamasaki, N. (2003). ‘The active lurker: Influence of an in-house online community on its outside environment.’ Proc GROUP 2003, ACM Press, Sanibel Island, FL, USA, November 2003, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom–Santelli, J., Muller, M., & Millen, D. (2008). ‘Social tagging roles: Publishers, evangelists. leaders.’ Proc CHI2008,ACM Press, Florence, IT, April 2008, 1041–1044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D. (2008). ‘Measuring intangibles revisited — Social media metrics and ROI.; http://missiondrivenmarketing.com/2008/02/21/measuring-intangibles-revisted-social-media- metrics-roi/, 21 February 2008.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Muller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Muller, M.J., Freyne, J., Dugan, C., Millen, D.R., Thom-Santelli, J. (2009). Return On Contribution (ROC): A Metric for Enterprise Social Software. In: Wagner, I., Tellioğlu, H., Balka, E., Simone, C., Ciolfi, L. (eds) ECSCW 2009. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-854-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-854-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-853-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-854-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics