Skip to main content

A Generic and Configurable Electronic Informer to Assist the Evaluation of Agent-Based Interactive Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

The evaluation of user interactive systems has been an active subject of research for many years. Many methods have been proposed but most existing evaluation methods do not take the specific architecture of an agent-based interactive system into account, nor do they focus on the coupling between the architecture and evaluation phase. In this article, we propose an agent-based architecture of interactive systems that is considered as being mixed (it is both functional and structural). On the basis of this architecture, we propose a generic and configurable model of an evaluation tool, called “electronic informer,” designed to assist evaluators in analyzing and evaluating interactive systems with such architecture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bass L, Little R, Pellegrino R, Reed S (1991) The Arch model: Seeheim revisited. Proceedings of User Interface Developers’ Workshop, Seeheim.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bastien JMC, Scapin DL (1995) Evaluating a user interface with ergonomic criteria. Int J Hum–Comput Interact, 7, 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Coutaz J (1987) PAC, an object-oriented model for dialog design. In: Bullinger H-J, Shackel B (eds.), INTERACT 87, Second IFIP International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, September 1–4, 1987, Stuttgart, Germany, pp. 431–436.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Coutaz J, Nigay L (2001) Architecture logicielle conceptuelle des systèmes interactifs, chapter 7 of “Analyse et Conception de l’Interaction Homme-Machine dans les systèmes d’information”. In: Kolski (ed.), Environnements évolués et évaluation de l’IHM, Éditions Hermes, Paris, pp. 207–246.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Etgen M, Cantor J (1999) What does getting WET (Web event-logging tool) mean for Web usability? User Experience Engineering Division, AT&T Labs, Middletown, NJ, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grislin-Le Strugeon E, Adam E, Kolski C (2001) Agents intelligents en interaction homme-machine dans les systèmes d’information. In: Kolski C (ed.), Environnements évolués et évaluation de l’IHM, Éditions Hermes, Paris, pp. 207–248.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldberg A (1983) Smaltalk-80, the interactive programming environnement. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hong IJ, Heer J, Waterson S (2001) WebQuilt: A proxy-based approach to remote Web usability testing. In: ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 19(3), 263–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nielsen J (1993) Usability Engineering, Academic, Boston, MA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Paganelli L, Paterno F (2002) Intelligent analysis of user interactions with Web applications. In: Proceedings of ACM IUI 2002, January 2002, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Paterno F, Ballardin G (2000) RemUSINE: a bridge between empirical and model-based evaluation when evaluators and users are distant. Interact Comput, 13(2), 229–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pfaff GE (1985) User Interface Management System. Springer,Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. SART (2007) Système d’Aide à la Régulation de Trafic du réseau de transport valenciennois et de ses pôles d’échanges. Final report, co-operative project SART, INRETS, France.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shneiderman B (1998) Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human–Computer Interaction. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tarpin-Bernard F, David B (1999) AMF: un modèle d’architecture multi-agents multi-facettes. TSI, 18, 555–586.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Trabelsi A, Ezzedine H, Kolski C (2004) Architecture modelling and evaluation of agent-based interactive systems. In: Proc. IEEE SMC 2004, October, The Hague, pp. 5159–5164.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present research work has been partially supported by the Ministère de l’Education Nationale, de la Recherche et de la Technologie, the Région Nord Pas-de-Calais, the FEDER (MIAOU, EUCUE, SART), the ANR ADEME (Viatic.Mobilité), and the PREDIM (MouverPerso).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tran, C., Ezzedine, H., Kolski, C. (2009). A Generic and Configurable Electronic Informer to Assist the Evaluation of Agent-Based Interactive Systems. In: Lopez Jaquero, V., Montero Simarro, F., Molina Masso, J., Vanderdonckt, J. (eds) Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces VI. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-206-1_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-206-1_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-205-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-206-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics