Skip to main content

Energy: The Master Resource

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
America’s Most Sustainable Cities and Regions

Abstract

Everyone has heard a lot about the topic of energy lately, and many people have an opinion on such issues as “U.S. energy independence,” “renewable energy,” “peak oil,” “fracking,” “nuclear energy,” “coal,” and so on. Often where one stands on these issues relates to where one sits politically, with politicians and a compliant media constituting the drivers of the public’s knowledge about energy. Regardless of political ideology, an often thin veneer of “knowledge” is used to support the various opinions. Beneath this veneer lies a wasteland of ignorance about what energy really is, how important it is to modern society, how much is produced, and how much we currently consume—or might be able to consume—in the future. The spectrum of opinions held range from “the end of cheap fossil fuels will cause a death blow to civilization” to “we can easily wean ourselves off of fossil fuels,” to “we have enough fossil fuels to last hundreds of years” to “wind and solar can provide all our energy needs.” Among the least informed, it seems, are the very politicians who often drive the national conversation about energy. Few of them have scientific backgrounds, and all of them feel compelled to address the needs of particular constituencies. The press tends also to be notoriously uninformed, even misinformed, about energy. With all due respect to them and to former Vice President Al Gore, the state of America’s energy security, as well as the enormous shortcomings of most visions of a sustainable future, are much greater “inconvenient truths” than even climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Thermodynamics is defined below.

  2. 2.

    Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2013. 2013 Average Monthly Bill-Residential. http://www.eia.gov/electricity/sales_revenue_price/pdf/table5_a.pdf.

  3. 3.

    Marvin Klein. 1967. Thermodynamics in Einstein’s thought. Science, 157, 509–516.

  4. 4.

    In contrast to laws, theories are less established principles that are believed to be true by most scientists, but are less easily demonstrated true than laws. Finally, hypotheses are in the realm of conjecture. They are falsifiable concepts that can be tested by observations or experimentation. Remember, scientific laws are not hypothesized. They are established truths, at least within the limits of what we know at a given time. No legislature, human desires, or other human institution can change them. This is hard for many humans to understand because they are used to believing that whatever they want will come to pass. Unfortunately, thermodynamics puts constraints on what we actually can do.

  5. 5.

    Zhu, X. G., Long, S., and Ort, D. R. 2008. What is the maximum efficiency with which photosynthesis can convert solar energy into biomass? Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 19(2), 153–159.

  6. 6.

    Chapman, L. 2007. Transport and climate change: a review. Journal of transport geography, 15(5), 354–367.; Friedemann, Alice. 2016. When trucks stop running. Springer Briefs, New York

  7. 7.

    Zhu et al. 2008, ibid.

  8. 8.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10th_millennium_BC.

  9. 9.

    For an overview of human development from an energy perspective see Chap. 2 of Hall, C.A.S., Klitgaard, K.A., 2012. Energy and the Wealth of Nations: Understanding the Biophysical Economy. Springer Publishing, New York, 407 p.

  10. 10.

    Guilford, M. C., Hall, C.A.S, O’Connor, P. and Cleveland, C.J. 2011. “A new long term assessment of energy return on investment (EROI) for US oil and gas discovery and production.” Sustainability, 3(10), 1866–1887.

  11. 11.

    Moerschbaecher, M., & Day, J.W. 2011. Ultra-deepwater Gulf of Mexico oil and gas: Energy return on financial investment and a preliminary assessment of energy return on energy investment. Sustainability. 3: 2009–2026. doi:10.3390/su3102009.

  12. 12.

    Where does one go for up-to-date energy statistics? The following sources provide up-to-date information about energy: For domestic information, U.S. Department of Energy (U.S.DOE) Energy Information Administration (EIA) produces reports available online (e.g., Annual Energy Outlook 2014; the Annual Energy Review 2011); For world information, BP publishes an annual review of world energy (2013 Statistical Review of World Energy); the International Energy Agency (IEA), and the annual World Energy Council survey (e.g., World Energy Resources: 2013) Survey provide information on global energy use.

  13. 13.

    The details of Hubbert’s predictions and methods and details on peak production are given a number of references. Campbell CJ, Laherrère JH. 1998. The end of cheap oil. Scientific American (March): 78–83. (29 January 2009; www.dieoff.org/page140.htm); Deffeyes KS. 2001. Hubbert’s Peak: The Impending World Oil Shortage. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.; Skrebowski C. 2004. Oil fields mega projects 2004. Petroleum Review (January): 18–20.; Hall and Klitgaard. 2012 ibid; Aleklett, K., 2012. Peeking at Peak Oil. Springer, New York, pp. 336.; Pascualli, R.C. and Hall, C.A.S. 2012. The First Half of the Age of Oil. Springer, NY.

  14. 14.

    Hallock, J. L., Tharakan, P. J., Hall, C. A., Jefferson, M., & Wu, W. 2004. Forecasting the limits to the availability and diversity of global conventional oil supply. Energy, 29(11), 1673–1696.

  15. 15.

    Association for the Study of Peak Oil (ASPO), 2008. Oil and Gas Liquids. 2004 Scenario, www.peakoil.net/uhdsg, 5 March, 2009.

  16. 16.

    Hall CAS, Tharakan PJ, Hallock J, Cleveland C, Jefferson M. 2003. Hydro- carbons and the evolution of human culture. Nature, 425, 18–322.

  17. 17.

    Skrebowski C. 2004. Oil fields mega projects 2004. Petroleum Review, (January), 18–20.

  18. 18.

    Campbell, C. J., & Wöstmann, A. 2013. Campbell’s Atlas of Oil and Gas Depletion. Springer.; Pascualli and Hall, 2012, Ibid.

  19. 19.

    Hall, Charles AS. 1972. Migration and metabolism in a temperate stream ecosystem. Ecology 585–604.

  20. 20.

    Hall, C.A.S, Balogh, S. and Murphy, D.J. 2009. What is the minimum EROI that a sustainable society must have? Energies 2(1), 25–47.

  21. 21.

    EIA. 2014. Annual Energy Outlook. Energy Information Agency, U.S. Department of Energy.

  22. 22.

    A new peak in conventional crude oil production, post and comments. http://euanmearns.com/a-new-peak-in-conventional-crude-oil-production/

  23. 23.

    Hughes, D. (2013). Drilling California: a reality check on the Monterey Shale. Post-Carbon Institute.

  24. 24.

    Art Berman. http://www.artberman.com/blog/; Hughes, D., 2013. Drill, Baby, Drill. Can Unconventional Fuels Usher in a New Era of Energy Abundance? Post Carbon Institute, Santa Rosa, CA, 166 p. Available online: www.postcarbon.org

  25. 25.

    Richard Heinberg. Snake Oil – How Fracking’s False Promise of Plenty Imperils Our Future. Post Carbon Institute, Santa Rosa, CA. 251 p. 2012. www.postcarbon.org

  26. 26.

    Bill Powers. Cold, Hungry and in the Dark. Exploding the Natural Gas Supply Myth. New Society Publishers. Gabriola, Canada. 312 p.

  27. 27.

    Hughes, D. 2014. Drilling Deeper: A Reality Check on the U.S. Government Forecasts for a Lasting Tight Oil and Gas Boom. Post Carbon Institute. October 2014.</Emphasis>

  28. 28.

    Canadian Energy Research Institute. 2014. Canadian Economic Impacts of New and Existing Oil Sands Development (2014–2038).; According to recent estimates the average tar sands producers using the “SADG” method, about half of total production, need oil prices at least $80 per barrel “to recover shipping and other costs plus a 10 % return on investment.” Chester Dawson. “Canadian Oil-Sands Producers Struggle” Wall Street Journal, August 2015. Online at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/oil-sands-producers-struggle-1440017716.

  29. 29.

    Brandt, Adam R., Jacob Englander, and Sharad Bharadwaj. 2013. “The energy efficiency of oil sands extraction: Energy return ratios from 1970 to 2010.” Energy, 55, 693–702.

  30. 30.

    Brandt, et al. 2013, ibid.

  31. 31.

    Marlo Raynolds, executive director of the Pembina Institute, a Canadian environmental group. http://money.cnn.com/2006/10/04/news/economy/oil_sands/?postversion=2006100700

  32. 32.

    Kevin Timoney. 2013. The Peace-Athabasca Delta – Portrait of a Dynamic Ecosystem. The University of Alberta Press, Edmonton. 596 p.

  33. 33.

    Moerschbaecher, M. and Day J.W. 2011. Ultra-deepwater Gulf of Mexico oil and gas: energy return on financial investment and a preliminary assessment of energy return on energy investment. Sustainability, 3(10), 2009–2026.

  34. 34.

    Moerschbaecher and Day, 2011, ibid; Tainter and Patzek. 2012. Drilling Down – The Gulf Oil Debacle and Our Energy Dilemma. Springer, New York. 242 p. 2012.

  35. 35.

    Offshore-technology.com. Deepwater Horizon: A Timeline of Events. Available online: http://www.offshore-technology.com/features/feature84446/ (accessed on 1 February 2011).

  36. 36.

    Rigzone Inc. Offshore Rig Day Rates. http://www.rigzone.com/data/dayrates/(accessed on 31 May 2011).; Leimkuhler, J. Shell Oil: How Do We Drill For Oil? Presented at the 2nd Annual Louisiana Oil & Gas Symposium, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA, August 2010.

  37. 37.

    Moerschbaecher and Day, 2011, ibid; Tainter and Patzek, 2012, ibid.

  38. 38.

    Michael Klare. 2012. The Race for What’s Left. Holt and Company, New York. 306.

  39. 39.

    Tainter and Patzek, 2012, ibid.

  40. 40.

    Hall, C. A., Powers, R., & Schoenberg, W. (2008). Peak oil, EROI, investments and the economy in an uncertain future. In Biofuels, solar and wind as renewable energy systems (pp. 109–132). Springer Netherlands.

  41. 41.

    Carbon Tracker Initiative. http://www.carbontracker.org/

  42. 42.

    Michael Brune, Executive director of the Sierra Club. National Geographic Magazine. January 2015.

  43. 43.

    Perlin, J. 2005. A forest journey: The story of wood and civilization. The Countryman Press.

  44. 44.

    For detailed analysis of solar PV see: Palmer, G. 2014. Energy in Australia: Peak Oil, Solar Power, and Asia’s Economic Growth. New York, NY: Springer. And; Prieto, P. A., & Hall, C. 2013. Spain’s photovoltaic revolution: the energy return on investment. Springer Science & Business Media.

  45. 45.

    For a detailed discussion on the sustainability of wind energy see: Davidsson, S., Grandell, L., Wachtmeister, H., & Höök, M. 2014. Growth curves and sustained commissioning modelling of renewable energy: Investigating resource constraints for wind energy. Energy Policy.

  46. 46.

    M. Dale, S. Krumdieck, and P. Broder. 2012. Global energy modeling – A biophysical approach (GEMBA) Part 2: Methodology. Ecological Economics. 73: 158–167.

  47. 47.

    Dukes, J.S. 2003. Burning buried sunshine: human consumption of ancient solar energy. Climatic Change, 61(1–2): 31–44.

  48. 48.

    Weißbach et al., 2013. Energy intensities, EROIs, and energy payback times of electricity generating power plants. Energy, 52(210).; Dale, M., & Benson S.M. 2013. Household Solar Photovoltaics: Supplier of Marginal Abatement, or Primary Source of Low-Emission Power? Energy Environ. Sci. doi:10.1039/c3ee42125b; Palmer 2014, ibid.; Prieto and Hall 2013, ibid.

  49. 49.

    Palmer, 2014, ibid.; Dale et al., 2012, ibid.

  50. 50.

    Dale et al., 2012, Ibid.

  51. 51.

    Lambert, J.G., Hall, C.A.S., Balogh, S.B., Gupta, A., Arnold, M. 2014. Energy, EROI and quality of life. Energy Policy, 64, 53–167.

  52. 52.

    Hall, Murphy and Balogh, 2009 ibid.

  53. 53.

    Vaclav Smil. 2015 Revolution? More like a crawl. http://www.politico.com/agenda/story/2015/05/energy-visionary-vaclav-smil-quick-transformations-wrong-000017

  54. 54.

    G. Maggio and G. Cacciola. 2012. When will oil, natural gas, and coal peak? Fuel, 98, 111–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.03.021

  55. 55.

    William R. Farrell. 2002. Classical Place Names in New York State: Origins, Histories and Meanings. Pine Grove Press.

  56. 56.

    Howard T. Odum. 1971. Environment, Power, and Society. Wiley-Interscience, New York.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Day, J.W., Hall, C. (2016). Energy: The Master Resource. In: America’s Most Sustainable Cities and Regions. Copernicus, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3243-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics