Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Sexual Psychology and Behavior pp 173–196Cite as

Male Production of Humor Produced by Sexually Selected Psychological Adaptations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Evolutionary Psychology ((EVOLPSYCH))

Abstract

Humor is a universal social phenomena enjoyed daily by individuals in every culture in the world. There is little doubt that evolutionary forces played an important role in shaping humor, but the nature of humor adaptation is still debated. Sexual selection theory is presumed to play a central role in the evolution of humor, and growing evidence supports this view. Humor plays an important role in mate choice, and because of the asymmetry in reproduction costs for males and females, humor production and appreciation should be sexually dimorphic. Predictions based on sexual selection theory are largely met. Data show that humor production ability is more important for women when selecting a mate, while men want a woman that will appreciate and laugh at their humor. Studies on conversational humor and personal dating ads show that men try to advertise their humor creativity, while women evaluate men’s humor. Men also tend to initiate more humor, especially when other women are around, while women smile and laugh more overall and particularly when men are present. In addition, studies show that men are better, on average, than women at producing high-quality spontaneous humor and are generally more motivated to present their humor production ability. Producing a great sense of humor translates into mating success, and men are more likely to benefit from such high-quality humor ability. Humor production is also correlated with intelligence, especially verbal intelligence, and is partially heritable, lending support that humor serves as a mental fitness indicator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, R. M., & Kirkevold, B. (1978). Looking, smiling, laughing, and moving in restaurants: Sex and age differences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 3(2), 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apte, M. L. (1985). Humor and laughter: An anthropological approach. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arden, R., Gottfredson, L. S., Miller, G., & Pierce, A. (2008). Intelligence and semen quality are positively correlated. Intelligence, 37(3), 277–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic theories of humor. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, G. C., Batchelor, J. H., & McDaniel, M. A. (2010). Smarter people are (a bit) more symmetrical: A meta-analysis of the relationship between intelligence and fluctuating asymmetry. Intelligence, 38(4), 393–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, D. (2010). Supernormal stimuli: How primal urges overran their evolutionary purpose. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, J. (1778). On laughter and ludicrous composition. In J. Beattie (Ed.), Essays. London: E. & C. Dilly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergen, D. (1998). Development of the sense of humor. In W. Ruch (Ed.), The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic (pp. 329–358). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressler, E., & Balshine, S. (2006). The influence of humor on desirability. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(1), 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressler, E., Martin, R. A., & Balshine, S. (2006). Production and appreciation of humor as sexually selected traits. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(2), 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodzinsky, D. M., & Rubien, J. (1976). Humor production as a function of sex of subject, creativity, and cartoon content. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44(4), 597–600.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 616–628.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cann, A., & Calhoun, L. G. (2001). Perceived personality associations with differences in sense of humor: Stereotypes of hypothetical others with high or low senses of humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 14(2), 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carless, S. A. (2000). The validity of scores on the Multidimensional Aptitude Battery. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(4), 592–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafe, W. (1987). Humor as a disabling mechanism. American Behavioral Scientist, 30(1), 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapell, M., Batten, M., Brown, J., Gonzalez, E., Herquet, G., & Massar, C. (2002). Frequency of public laughter in relation to sex, age, ethnicity, and social context. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95(3), 746.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cherkas, L., Hockberg, F., MacGregor, A. J., Snieder, H., & Spector, T. D. (2000). Happy families: A twin study of humour. Twin Research, 3, 17–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M., O’Donnell, D., Caryl, P. G., Morrison, R., & Bale, C. (2007). Chat-up lines as male displays: Effects of content, sex, and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 1075–1085.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M., & Gressley, D. (1991). Creativity, caring, and context: Women’s and men’s accounts of humor preferences and practices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 217–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, H. J., O’Brien, K. F., McCabe, R. B., & Quinter, V. E. (1985). Values in mate selection: A 1984 campus survey. College Student Journal, 19(1), 44–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, C. (1998). The dog that didn’t bark in the night: A new sociological approach to the cross-cultural study of humor. In W. Ruch (Ed.), The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic (pp. 293–306). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deary, I. J. (2005). Intelligence, health and death. The Psychologist, 18(10), 610–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deckers, L. (1998). Influence of mood on humor. In W. Ruch (Ed.), The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic (pp. 309–328). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. (1998). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, K. R., & Martin, R. A. (2010). Humor creation ability and mental health: Are funny people more psychologically healthy? Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 6(3), 196–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1993). Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist, 48(4), 384.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1983). Measuring humor ability: Revision and construct validation of the Humor Perceptiveness Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56(1), 159–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 125–139.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A., & Mazzella, R. (1991). Psychometric intelligence and verbal humor ability. Personality & Individual Differences, 12(5), 427–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A., & Mazzella, R. (1993). Preliminary validation of a multidimensional model of wittiness. Journal of Personality, 61(3), 439–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flamson, T., & Barrett, H. C. (2008). The encryption theory of humor: A knowledge-based mechanism of honest signaling. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 6(4), 261–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D. G. (1964). Smiling in blind infants and the issue of innate vs. acquired. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 5(3–4), 171–184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, J. (2001). Humor in apes. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 14(2), 163–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gervais, M., & Wilson, D. S. (2005). The evolution and functions of laughter and humor: A synthetic approach. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 80(4), 395–430.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, R. (1990). Sex differences among partner preferences: Are the sexes really very similar? Sex Roles, 23(9), 501–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L. S., & Deary, I. J. (2004). Intelligence predicts health and longevity, but why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(1), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grammer, K. (1990). Strangers meet: Laughter and nonverbal signs of interest in opposite-sex encounters. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14(4), 209–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grammer, K., & Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1990). The ritualisation of laughter. In W. Koch (Ed.), Natürlichkeit der Sprache und der Kultur: Acta Colloquii (pp. 192–214). Bochum: Brockmeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, W. G., & Bryant, W. H. M. (1998). Self-monitoring and the self-attribution of positive emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 250–261.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greengross, G., & Mankoff, R. (2012). Inside “Inside Jokes”: The hidden side of humor. A review of Matthew M. Hurley, Daniel C. Dennett, and Reginald B. Adams Jr., Inside jokes: Using humor to reverse-engineer the mind. Evolutionary Psychology, 10(3), 443–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greengross, G., Martin, R. A., & Miller, G. F. (2012a). Childhood experiences of professional comedians: Peer and parent relationships and humor use. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 25(4), 491–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greengross, G., Martin, R. A., & Miller, G. F. (2012b). Personality traits, intelligence, humor styles, and humor production ability of professional stand-up comedians compared to college students. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 6(1), 74–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greengross, G., & Miller, G. F. (2008). Dissing oneself versus dissing rivals: Effects of status, personality, and sex on the short-term and long-term attractiveness of self-deprecating and other-deprecating humor. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(3), 393–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greengross, G., & Miller, G. F. (2009). The Big Five personality traits of professional comedians compared to amateur comedians, comedy writers, and college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(2), 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greengross, G., & Miller, G. F. (2011). Humor ability reveals intelligence, predicts mating success, and is higher in males. Intelligence, 39(4), 188–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guéguen, N. (2008). The effect of a woman’s smile on men’s courtship behavior. Social Behavior and Personality, 36(9), 1233–1236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guéguen, N. (2010). Men’s sense of humor and women’s responses to courtship solicitations: An experimental field study. Psychological Reports, 107(1), 145–156.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, S. L. (1977). Dating choices of high school students. Family Coordinator, 26(2), 133–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 81–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, J. (2000). Functions of humor in the conversations of men and women. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 709–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchens, C. (2007). Why women aren’t funny. Vanity Fair, 557, 54–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howrigan, D. P., & MacDonald, K. B. (2008). Humor as a mental fitness indicator. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(4), 652–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, M., Dennett, D., & Adams, R., Jr. (2011). Inside jokes: Using humor to reverse-engineer the mind (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janus, S. S. (1975). The great comedians: Personality and other factors. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 35(2), 169–174.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janus, S. S., Bess, B. E., & Janus, B. R. (1978). The great comediennes: Personality and other factors. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 38(4), 367–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, S. B., Kozbelt, A., Bromley, M. L., Geher, G., & Miller, G. (2008). The role of creativity and humor in human mate selection. In G. Geher & G. Miller (Eds.), Mating intelligence: Sex, relationships, and the mind’s reproductive system (pp. 227–262). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keaton, D. (2012). Then again. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D., & Ekman, P. (1994). Facial expressions of emotion. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 361–369). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation: A study of the conscious and unconscious processes of humor, scientific discovery and art. London: Hutchison Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFrance, M., Hecht, M. A., & Paluck, E. L. (2003). The contingent smile: A meta-analysis of sex differences in smiling. Psychological Bulletin, 129(2), 305–334.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M. D., & Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (1998). Exploring paradigms: The study of gender and sense of humor near the end of the 20th century. In W. Ruch (Ed.), The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic (pp. 231–270). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390–423.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li, N. P., Griskevicius, V., Durante, K. M., Jonason, P. K., Pasisz, D. J., & Aumer, K. (2009). An evolutionary perspective on humor: Sexual selection or interest indication? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 923–936.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. A. (2007). The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: An examination of biological and cultural influences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(2), 193–208.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lundy, D. E., Tan, J., & Cunningham, M. R. (1998). Heterosexual romantic preferences: The importance of humor and physical attractiveness for different types of relationships. Personal Relationships, 5(3), 311–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manke, B. (1998). Genetic and environmental contributions to children’s interpersonal humor. In W. Ruch (Ed.), The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic (pp. 361–384). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. A. (2003). Sense of humor. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp. 313–326). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. A. (2014). Humor and gender: An overview of psychological research. In D. Chiaro & R. Baccolini (Eds.), Gender and humor: Interdisciplinary and international perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. A. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. London: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. A. (2013). Humor and gender: An overview of psychological research. In D. Chiaro & R. Baccolini (Eds.), Humor and gender. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. A., & Kuiper, N. (1999). Daily occurrence of laughter: Relationships with age, gender, and type a personality. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 12(4), 355–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. A., & Lefcourt, H. (1983). Sense of humor as a moderator of the relation between stressors and moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1313–1324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 48–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGhee, P. E. (1979). Humor: Its origin and development. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehu, M., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2008). Naturalistic observations of smiling and laughter in human group interactions. Behaviour, 145(12), 1747–1780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehu, M., Little, A. C., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2008). Sex differences in the effect of smiling on social judgments: An evolutionary approach. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2(3), 103–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mickes, L., Walker, D., Parris, J., Mankoff, R., & Christenfeld, N. (2011). Who’s funny: Gender stereotypes, humor production, and memory bias. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 108–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (2000a). The mating mind: How sexual selection shaped the evolution of human nature. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (2000b). Mental traits as fitness indicators: Expanding evolutionary psychology’s adaptationism. In D. LeCroy & P. Moller (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human reproductive behavior (pp. 62–74). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (2007). Sexual selection for moral virtues. Quarterly Review of Biology, 82(2), 97–125.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mobbs, D., Hagan, C. C., Azim, E., Menon, V., & Reiss, A. L. (2005). Personality predicts activity in reward and emotional regions associated with humor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(45), 16502–16506.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morreall, J. (Ed.). (1987). The philosophy of laughter and humor. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. A., Ropog, B. L., & Rodgers, R. P. (1997). Sex differences in humor. Psychological Reports, 81, 221–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevo, O., Nevo, B., & Yin, J. L. (2001). Singaporean humor: A cross-cultural, cross-gender comparison. Journal of General Psychology, 128(2), 143–156.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, K., Kim, H.-J., Kim, B.-J., Park, K.-W., & Lee, D.-H. (2007). Pathological laughter as an unusual manifestation of acute stroke. European Neurology, 59(1–2), 83–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Quin, K., & Derks, P. (1997). Humor and creativity: A review of the empirical literature. In M. Runco (Ed.), Creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 223–252). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp, J. (2007). Neuroevolutionary sources of laughter and social joy: Modeling primal human laughter in laboratory rats. Behavioural Brain Research, 182(2), 231–244.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp, J., & Burgdorf, J. (2003). ‘Laughing’ rats and the evolutionary antecedents of human joy? Physiology & Behavior, 79(3), 533–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penton-Voak, I. S., & Chang, H. Y. (2008). Attractiveness judgements of individuals vary across emotional expression and movement conditions. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 6(2), 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R., & Spinath, F. M. (2004). Intelligence: Genetics, genes, and genomics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 112–129.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preuschoft, S., & Van-Hooff, J. A. (1997). The social function of ‘smile’ and ‘laughter’: Variations across primate species and societies. In U. Segerstrale & P. Molnar (Eds.), Nonverbal communication: Where nature meets culture (pp. 171–190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokosch, M. D., Yeo, R. A., & Miller, G. F. (2005). Intelligence tests with higher g-loadings show higher correlations with body symmetry: Evidence for a general fitness factor mediated by developmental stability. Intelligence, 33(2), 203–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provine, R. (1993). Laughter punctuates speech: Linguistic, social and gender contexts of laughter. Ethology, 95(4), 291–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provine, R. (2000). Laughter: A scientific investigation. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provine, R., & Fischer, K. (1989). Laughing, smiling, and talking: Relation to sleeping and social context in humans. Ethology, 83(4), 295–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. S. (1998). The neurology and evolution of humor, laughter, and smiling: The false alarm theory. Medical Hypotheses, 51(4), 351–354.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, V. (1984). Semantic mechanisms of humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. T., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2001). Getting a laugh: Gender, status, and humor in task discussions. Social Forces, 80(1), 123–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W. (Ed.). (1998). The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic (Vol. Humor research-3). Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W. (2004). Humor. In C. P. Peterson & M. E. P. Seligman (Eds.), Character strengths and virtues: A handbook of classification (pp. 583–598). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, J. P., Bons, T. A., Vernon, P. A., & Čvorović, J. (2007). Genetic and environmental contributions to population group differences on the Raven’s Progressive Matrices estimated from twins reared together and apart. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1619), 1773–1777.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Samson, A. C., & Huber, O. (2007). The interaction of cartoonist’s gender and formal features of cartoons. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 20(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, N. E., & Williams, D. I. (1971). The evolution of theories of humor. Journal of Behavioral Science, 1, 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 870–883.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. E., Waldorf, V. A., & Trembath, D. L. (1990). Single white male looking for thin, very attractive.... Sex Roles, 23(11/12), 675–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smoski, M. J., & Bachorowski, J.-A. (2003). Antiphonal laughter between friends and strangers. Cognition & Emotion, 17(2), 327–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, M. M., & Fuller, R. G. C. (1972). Effects of group laughter on responses to humorous laughter. Psychological Reports, 30, 132–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R. (2003). Why aren’t we all hutterites? Costly signaling theory and religious behavior. Human Nature, 14(2), 91–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: Partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19(4), 463–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. A., & Esses, V. M. (2004). Individual differences in reaction to sexist humor. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 7(1), 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (2008). The evolutionary biology of human female sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todosijević, B., Ljubinković, S., & Arančić, A. (2003). Mate selection criteria: A trait desirability assessment study of sex differences in Serbia. Evolutionary Psychology, 1, 116–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toro-Morn, M., & Sprecher, S. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of mate preferences among university students: The United States vs. the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 34(2), 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. G. (1980). Self-monitoring and humor production. Journal of Personality, 48(2), 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van-Hooff, J. A. R. A. M., & Preuschoft, S. (2003). Laughter and smiling: The intertwining of nature and culture. In F. B. M. D. Waal & P. L. Tyack (Eds.), Animal social complexity (pp. 260–287). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, P., Martin, R. A., Schermer, J. A., Cherkas, L., & Spector, T. (2008). Genetic and environmental contributions to humor styles: A replication study. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 11(1), 44–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, P., Martin, R. A., Schermer, J. A., & Mackie, A. (2008). A behavioral genetic investigation of humor styles and their correlations with the big-5 personality dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(5), 1116–1125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vettin, J., & Todt, D. (2005). Human laughter, social play, and play vocalizations of non-human primates: An evolutionary approach. Behaviour, 142(2), 217–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisfeld, G. E. (1993). The adaptive value of humor and laughter. Ethnology and Social Biology, 14(2), 141–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisfeld, G. E., Nowak, N. T., Lucas, T., Weisfeld, C. C., Imamoğlu, E. O., & Butovskaya, M. (2011). Do women seek humorousness in men because it signals intelligence? A cross-cultural test. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 24(4), 435–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur, C. J., & Campbell, L. (2011). Humor in romantic contexts: Do men participate and women evaluate? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(7), 918–929.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection—A selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205–214.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1997). The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA

    Gil Greengross

Authors
  1. Gil Greengross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gil Greengross .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan, USA

    Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

  2. Department of Psychology, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan, USA

    Todd K. Shackelford

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Greengross, G. (2014). Male Production of Humor Produced by Sexually Selected Psychological Adaptations. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Sexual Psychology and Behavior. Evolutionary Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0314-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation