Skip to main content

Two-Stage Network Processes: DEA Frontier Identification

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Data Envelopment Analysis

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 208))

  • 2551 Accesses

Abstract

The current chapter focuses on how to identify DEA frontier when decision making units (DMUs) are in forms of two-stage network processes. In these two stage network processes, all the outputs from the first stage are intermediate measures that make up the inputs to the second stage. Due to the existence of intermediate measures, the usual procedure of adjusting the inputs or outputs by the efficiency scores, as in the standard DEA approach, does not necessarily yield a frontier projection. The current chapter presents an approach for determining the frontier points for inefficient DMUs within the framework of two-stage network processes.

Part of this chapter is based upon Chen, Y., Cook, W. D. and Zhu, Joe, Deriving the DEA Frontier for Two-Stage Processes, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 202 (2010), 138–142, with permissions from Elsevier Science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Castelli, L., Pesenti, R., & Ukovich, W. (2010). A classification of DEA models when the internal structure of the Decision Making Units is considered. Annals of Operations Research, 173(1), 207–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., Li, N., & Zhu, J. (2009). Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(2009), 1170–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2010). Deriving the DEA frontier for two-stage processes. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(2010), 138–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., & Hwang, S.-N. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1), 418–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H. F., Sexton, T. R. (2004). Network DEA: Efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structures. Computers and Operations Research, 31(9), 1365–1410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, L., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2008). DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition. Naval Research Logistics, 55, 643–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yao Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen, Y., Cook, W.D., Zhu, J. (2014). Two-Stage Network Processes: DEA Frontier Identification. In: Cook, W., Zhu, J. (eds) Data Envelopment Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 208. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8068-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics