Skip to main content

Creativity

What are We to Measure?

  • Chapter
Handbook of Creativity

Part of the book series: Perspectives on Individual Differences ((PIDF))

Abstract

Creativity consists of at least four components: (1) the creative process, (2) the creative product, (3) the creative person, and (4) the creative situation (MacKinnon, 1970; Mooney, 1963). It has been studied from so many frequently incompatible theoretical perspectives, each with its own assumptions, methodologies, biases, and even meta-theoretical view, that coverage of all in a single chapter is not possible. This chapter concentrates on the divergent thinking approach to the study of the creative process—an approach that has the most explicitly developed theoretical base, underlies most creativity tests, and has generated the most empirical research. Along the way, information on some other components and theoretical approaches will be presented. Most other approaches are covered in detail in other chapters in this handbook, and general presentations of creativity theories are in Albert (1983), Bloomberg (1973), Busse and Mansfield (1980), and Vernon (1970).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albert, R. S. (Ed.). (1983). Genius and eminence. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, K. (1980). Brain power. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983a). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983b). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. H. (1978). Chase, chance, and creativity. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1968). Creativity and personal freedom. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F., and Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg, M. (Ed.). (1973). Creativity: Theory and research. New Haven, CT: College and University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E. G. (1923). Intelligence as the tests test it. New Republic, 35, 35–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer’s dictionary of phrase and fable. (1962). ( 6th ed. ). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buros, O. K. (Ed.). (1972). The seventh mental measurement yearbook. Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buros, O. K. (Ed.). (1978). The eighth mental measurement yearbook. Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busse, T. V., and Mansfield, R. S. (1980). Theories of the creative process: A review and a perspective. Journal of Creative Behavior, 14, 91–103, 132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1968). [Review of The nature of human intelligence by J. P. Guilford]. American Educational Research Journal, 73, 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claridge, G. (1987). Psychotism and arousal. In J. Strelau, and H. J. Eysenck (Eds.), Personality dimensions and arousal. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant, J. B. (1947). On understanding science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1984). Essentials of psychological testing ( 4th ed. ). New York: Harper, and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crovitz, H. F. (1970). Gallon’s walk. New York: Harper, and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detterman, D. K. (1979). Detterman’s laws of individual difference research. In R. J. Sternberg, and D. K. Detterman (Eds.), Human intelligence (pp. 165–175 ). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: D. C. Heath. Ericsson, K. A., and Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1979). The structure and measurement of intelligence. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J., and Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. H. (1970). Faulty construct-ion. Contemporary Psychology, 15, 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. H. (1980). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. H. (1986). Nature’s gambit. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, H. H. (1963). A critique on creativity in science. In M. A. Coler (Ed.), Essays on creativity in the sciences (pp. 123152 ). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, F. N. (1924). Mental tests. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books. Getzels, J. W., and Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem solving in art. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, B. (Ed.). (1952). The creative process. New York: Mentor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, B. (1963). Ultimate criteria for two levels of creativity. In C. W. Taylor, and F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 30–43 ). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, B., Rompel, R., and Taylor, C. W. (1964). A creative process check list: Its development and validation. In C. W. Taylor (Ed.), Widening horizons in creativity (pp. 19–33 ). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E. (1981). Darwin on man ( 2nd ed. ). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of the intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267–293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1959). Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist, 14, 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1975). Creativity: A quarter century of progress. In I. A. Taylor, and J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 37–59 ). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1977). Way beyond the IQ. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1982). Cognitive psychology’s ambiguities: Some suggested remedies. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 4859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (Ed.). (1981). Scientific revolutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. G. (Ed.). (1976). Can theories be refuted? Boston: Riedel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henle, M. (1962). The birth and death of ideas. In H. E. Gruber, G. Terrell, and M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking (pp. 31–62 ). New York: Atherton.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Henle, M. (1974). The cognitive approach: The snail beneath the shell. In S. Rosner, and L. E. Abt (Eds.), Essays in creativity (pp. 23–44 ). Croton-on-Hudson, NY: North River Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocevar, D. (1979). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 191–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hocevar, D. (1980). Intelligence, divergent thinking, and creativity. Intelligence, 4, 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hocevar, D. (1981). Measurement of creativity: Review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 450–464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L., and Knapp, J. R. (1973). On the subjective character of the empirical base of Guilford’s structure of intellect model. Psychological Bulletin, 80,33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, L. (1966). Contrary imaginations. London: Methuen. Humphreys, L. G. (1962). The organization of human abilities. American Psychologist, 17, 475–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. W., and Messick, S. (1967). The person, the product, and the response: Conceptual problems in the assessment of

    Google Scholar 

  • creativity. In J. Kagan (Ed.), Creativity and learning (pp. 1–19). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E. (1979). The rocky road from acts to dispositions. American Psychologist, 34, 107–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khatena, J. (1984). Imagery and creative imagination. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York: Macmillan. Kogan, N. ( 1983 ). Stylistic variation in childhood and adolescence: Creativity, metaphor, and cognitive styles. In P. H.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussen, J. H. Flavell, and E. M. Markman (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (4th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 630–706). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1963). The essential tension: Tradition and innovation in scientific research. In C. W. Taylor, and F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 341–354 ). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of research programmes. In I. Lakatos, and A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 8–101 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1978). Philosophical papers. Vol I: The methodology of scientific research programmes (J. Worrall, and G. Currie, Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I., and Musgrave, A. (Eds.). (1970). Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, E. (1985). Creative questioning for the future. In J. Freeman (Ed.), The psychology of gifted children (pp. 379–392 ). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCorquodale, K., and Meehl, P. E. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55, 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. W. (1962). The personality correlates of creativity: A study of American architects. In S. Coopersmith (Ed.), Personality research, Vol. 2 of G. S. Nielsen (Ed.), Proceedings of the XIV International Congress of Applied Psychology (pp. 11–39 ). Copenhagen: Munksgaard.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. W. (1965). Personality and the realization of creative potential. American Psychologist, 20, 273–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. (1970). Creativity: A multi-faceted phenomenon. In J. D. Roslansky (Ed.), Creativity: A discussion at the Nobel conference (pp. 17–32 ). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltzman, I. (1960). On the training of originality. Psychological Review, 67, 229–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, R. J., and Busse, T. V. (1981). The psychology of creativity and discovery. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mednick, S. A., and Mednick, M. T. (1964). An associative interpretation of the creative process. In C. W. Taylor (Ed.), Widening horizons in creativity (pp. 54–68 ). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeker, M. (1969). The structure of intellect: Its interpretation and uses. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, W. B. (1977). Cognitive and affective components of creativity in mathematics and the physical sciences. In J. C. Stanley, W. C. George, and C. H. Solano (Eds.), The gifted and the creative: A fifty-year perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., and Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. E. (1959). Liberalization of basic S-R concepts: Extensions to conflict behavior, motivation and social learning. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 2, pp. 196–292 ). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, R. L. (1963). A conceptual model for integrating four approaches to the identification of creative talent. In C. W. Taylor, and F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 331–340 ). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., and Simon, H. A. (1962). The processes of creative thinking. In H. E. Gruber, G. Terrell, and M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking (pp. 63–119 ). New York: Atherton Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, J. G. (1972). Creativity in the person who will never produce anything original and useful: The concept of creativity as a normally distributed trait. American Psychologist, 27, 717–727.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pezzullo, T. R., Thorsen, E. E., and Madaus, G. F. (1972). The heritability of Jensen’s level I and II and divergent thinking. American Educational Research Journal, 9, 539–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. ( 1935, trans. 1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • PoincarĂ©, H. (1913). The foundations of science. Lancaster, PA: Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 174–220 ). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, J. (1931). The psychology of the inventor: A study of the patentee. Washington, DC: Inventors Publishing Co. Rothenberg, A. (1979). The emerging goddess: The creative process in art, science, and other fields. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, creativity, and leadership: Historiometric inquiries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1931). Creative mind. New York: Appleton. Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. Journal of Personality, 36, 311–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1979). Intelligence research at the interface between differential and cognitive psychology: Prospects and proposals. In R. J. Sternberg, and D. K. Detterman (Eds.), Human intelligence (pp. 33–60 ). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triarchic theory of intellectual giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg, and J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 223–243 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., and Davidson, J. E. (1986). Cobnitive development in the gifted and talented. In F. D. Horowitz, and M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 37–74 ). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., and Detterman, D. K. (Eds.). (1979). Human intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., and Detterman, D. K. (Eds.). (1986). What is intelligence? Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. W. (1947). A factorial study of fluency in writing. Psychometrika, 12, 239–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. W., and Barron, F. (Eds.). (1963). Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. W., and Ellison, R. L. (1975). Moving toward working models in creativity: Utah creativity experiences and insights.

    Google Scholar 

  • In I. A. Taylor, and J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 191–223). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. W., and Holland, J. (1964). Predictors of creative performance. In C. W. Taylor (Ed.), Creativity: Progress and potential (pp. 15–48 ). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomdike, R. L. (1963). Some methodological issues in the study of creativity. In Proceedings of the 1962 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems (pp. 40–54 ). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1961). Factors affecting creative thinking in children: An interim research report. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 7, 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1975). Creativity research in education: Still alive. In I. A. Taylor, and J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. B. (1968). Psychology and the philosophy of science. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, P. E. (Ed.). (1970). Creativity. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Pengu in Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, M. A. (1970). Creativity. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (3rd ed., pp. 12111272 ). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, M. A. (1971). The intelligence/creativity distinction. New York: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, M. A. (1986). Creativity testing and giftedness. In F. D. Horowitz, and M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 99–123 ). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, M. A., and Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Wallach, M. A., and Wing, C. W., Jr. (1969). The talented student. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. W. (1986). Creativity: Genius and other myths. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, G. S. (1975). Creativity and intelligence: A personality approach. Chapel Hill, NC: Institute for Research in Social Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, G. S. (1986). Positive exceptionality: The academically gifted and the creative. In R. T. Brown, and C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on childhood exceptionality: A handbook (pp. 311–343 ). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive thinking (enlarged ed.). New York: Harper, and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigler, E., and Butterfield, E. C. (1968). Motivational aspects of changes in IQ test performance of culturally deprived nursery group school children. Child Development, 39, 1–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brown, R.T. (1989). Creativity. In: Glover, J.A., Ronning, R.R., Reynolds, C.R. (eds) Handbook of Creativity. Perspectives on Individual Differences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5356-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5356-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3212-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5356-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics