Abstract
Amblyopia is defined primarily as a loss of acuity. In anisometropia, grating acuity, Snellen (optotype) acuity, and vernier acuity are degraded in proportion to each other. In strabismus, Snellen and vernier acuity are degraded more than grating acuity. The main problem in both cases is loss of binocular function, producing loss of stereoscopic vision. A number of other properties are also affected. There is uncertainty about the location of an object in space, a reduction in the ability to detect shapes, deficits in motion and direction perception, less ability to track several objects at once, reduced counting ability, and suppression of the image in one eye by the image in the other, to avoid the diplopia and confusion arising when the two eyes are looking in different directions. Some of these deficits are seen in the fellow as well as the amblyopic eye and in binocular viewing. There are also deficits in eye movements: poor fixation, a longer latency for saccades, inability to follow an object moving away from the nose smoothly, and slow inaccurate movements in visually guided reaches. These particularly affect reading so that an amblyope’s reading speed in both eyes is one-half to three-quarters of that of a normal person.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aaen-Stockdale C, Ledgeway T, Hess RF (2007) Second-order optic flow deficits in amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:5532–5538
Barrett BT, Pacey IE, Bradley A, Thibos LN, Morrill P (2003) Nonveridical visual perception in human amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:1555–1567
Birch E (2013) Amblyopia and binocular vision. Prog Retin Eye Res 33:67–84
Bouma H (1970) Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature 226:177–178
Bradley A, Freeman RD (1981) Contrast sensitivity in anisometropic amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol 21:467–476
Daw NW (1962) Why after-images are not seen in normal circumstances. Nature 196:1143–1145
Demanins R, Wang YZ, Hess RF (1999) The neural deficit in strabismic amblyopia: sampling considerations. Vis Res 39:3575–3585
Ellemberg D, Lewis TL, Maurer D, Brar S, Brent HP (2002) Better perception of global motion after monocular than after binocular deprivation. Vis Res 42:169–179
Enoch JM, Berger R, Birns R (1970) A static perimetric technique believed to test receptive field properties: extension and verification of the analysis. Doc Ophthalmol 29:127–153
Fischer J, Whitney D (2011) Object-level visual information gets through the bottleneck of crowding. J Neurophysiol 106:1389–1398
Flom MC, Bedell HE (1985) Identifying amblyopia using associated conditions, acuity, and nonacuity features. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 62:153–160
Flom MC, Weymouth FW, Kahneman D (1963) Visual resolution and contour interaction. J Opt Soc Am 53:1026–1032
Freeman AW, Nguyen VA, Jolly N (1996) Components of visual acuity loss in strabismus. Vis Res 36:765–774
Gstalder RJ, Green DG (1971) Laser interferometric acuity in amblyopia. Journal Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 8:251–256
Harrad R (1996) Psychophysics of suppression. Eye 10:270–273
Hayward J, Truong G, Partanen M, Giaschi D (2011) Effects of speed, age, and amblyopia on the perception of motion-defined form. Vis Res 51:2216–2223
Hess RF (1977) On the relationship between strabismic amblyopia and eccentric fixation. Br J Ophthalmol 61:767–773
Hess RF, Daw NW (2009) Amblyopia. In: Levin LA, Albert DM (eds) Ocular Disease: Mechanisms and Management. Saunders Ltd., New York
Hess RF, Holliday IE (1992) The spatial localization deficit in amblyopia. Vis Res 32:1319–1339
Hess RF, Jacobs RJ (1979) A preliminary report of acuity and contour interaction across the amblyope's visual field. Vis Res 19:1403–1408
Hess RF, Pointer JS (1985) Differences in the neural basis of human amblyopia: the distribution of the anomaly across the visual field. Vis Res 25:1577–1594
Hess RF, Campbell FW, Greenhalgh T (1978) On the nature of the neural abnormality in human amblyopia; neural aberrations and neural sensitivity loss. Pflugers Arch 377:201–207
Hess RF, Field DJ, Watt RJ (1990) The puzzle of amblyopia. In: Blakemore C (ed) Vision: coding and efficiency. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Hess RF, Wang YZ, Demanins R, Wilkinson F, Wilson HR (1999) A deficit in strabismic amblyopia for global shape detection. Vis Res 39:901–914
Hess RF, Dakin SC, Tewfik M, Brown B (2001) Contour interaction in amblyopia: scale selection. Vis Res 41:2285–2296
Hess RF, Barnes G, Dumoulin SO, Dakin SC (2003a) How many positions can we perceptually encode, one or many? Vis Res 43:1575–1587
Hess RF, Pointer JS, Simmers A, Bex PJ (2003b) Border distinctness in amblyopia. Vis Res 43:2255–2264
Ho CS, Giaschi DE (2007) Stereopsis-dependent deficits in maximum motion displacement in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. Vision Res 47 (21):2778–2785
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1960) Receptive fields of optic nerve fibres in the spider monkey. J Physiol 154:572–580
Husk JS, Farivar R, Hess RF (2012) Amblyopic deficits in processing structure-from-motion. J Vis 12:4
Irvine SR (1948) Amblyopia ex anopsia. Observations on retinal inhibition, scotoma, projection, light difference discrimination and visual acuity. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 66:527–575
Jeffrey BG, Wang YZ, Birch EE (2004) Altered global shape discrimination in deprivation amblyopia. Vis Res 44:167–177
Kanonidou E, Proudlock FA, Gottlob I (2010) Reading strategies in mild to moderate strabismic amblyopia: an eye movement investigation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:3502–3508
Katz B, Sireteanu R (1990) The Teller acuity card test: a useful method for the clinical routine? Clin Vis Sci 5:307–323
Lai XJ, Alexander J, He M, Yang Z, Suttle C (2011) Visual functions and interocular interactions in anisometropic children with and without amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:6849–6859
Le Grand R, Mondloch CJ, Maurer D, Brent HP (2001) Neuroperception. Early visual experience and face processing. Nature 410:890
Levi DM (2007) Image segregation in strabismic amblyopia. Vis Res 47:1833–1838
Levi DM, Klein S (1982) Hyperacuity and amblyopia. Nature 298:268–270
Levi DM, Klein SA (1983) Spatial localization in normal and amblyopic vision. Vis Res 23:1005–1017
Levi DM, Klein SA (1985) Vernier acuity, crowding and amblyopia. Vis Res 25:979–991
Levi DM, Klein SA (1986) Sampling in spatial vision. Nature 320:360–362
Levi DM, Klein SA (1990a) Visual acuity in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia: a tale of two syndromes. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 3:289–301
Levi DM, Klein SA (1990b) Equivalent intrinsic blur in spatial vision. Vis Res 30:1971–1993
Levi DM, Polat U (1996) Neural plasticity in adults with amblyopia. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 93:6830–6834
Levi DM, McKee SP, Movshon JA (2011) Visual deficits in anisometropia. Vis Res 51:48–57
Levi DM, Song S, Pelli DG (2007) Amblyopic reading is crowded. J Vis 7(2):21–17
Lewis TL, Ellemberg D, Maurer D, Wilkinson F, Wilson HR, Dirks M, Brent HP (2002) Sensitivity to global form in glass patterns after early visual deprivation in humans. Vis Res 42:939–948
Lions C, Bui-Quoc E, Seassau M, Bucci MP (2013) Binocular coordination of saccades during reading in strabismic children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:620–628
Maurer D, Lewis TL (1993) Visual outcomes after infantile cataract. In: Simons K (ed) Early visual development, normal and abnormal. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 454–484
Maxwell GF, Lemij HG, Collewijn H (1995) Conjugacy of saccades in deep amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36:2514–2522
McKee SP, Westheimer G (1978) Improvement in vernier acuity with practice. Percept Psychophys 24:258–262
McKee SP, Levi DM, Movshon JA (2003) The pattern of visual deficits in amblyopia. J Vis 3:380–405
Niechwiej-Szwedo E, Goltz HC, Chandrakumar M, Hirji ZA, Wong AMF (2010) Effect of anisometropic amblyopia in visuomotor behavior, I: saccadic eye movements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:6348–6354
Niechwiej-Szwedo E, Kennedy SA, Colpa L, Chandrakumar M, Goltz HC, Wong AM (2012) Effects of induced monocular blur versus anisometropic amblyopia on saccades, reaching, and eye-hand coordination. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:4354–4362
Ono S, Das VE, Mustari MJ (2012) Conjugate adaptation of smooth pursuit during monocular viewing in strabismic monkeys with exotropia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:2038–2045
Pelli DG, Tillman KA (2008) The uncrowded window of object recognition. Nat Neurosci 11:1129–1135
Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ (1988) The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vis Sci 2:187–199
Pelli DG, Levi DM, Chung STL (2004) Using visual noise to characterize amblyopic letter identification. J Vis 4:904–920
Pugh M (1962) Amblyopia and the retina. Br J Ophthalmol 46:193–211
Rouse MW, Tittle JS, Braunstein ML (1989) Stereoscopic depth perception by static stereo-deficient observers in dynamic displays with constant and changing disparity. Optom Vis Sci 66:355–362
Schor CM (1977) Visual stimuli for strabismic suppression. Perception 6:583–588
Secen J, Culham J, Ho C, Giaschi D (2011) Neural correlates of the multiple-object tracking deficit in amblyopia. Vis Res 51:2517–2527
Sengpiel F, Jirmann KU, Vorobyov V, Eysel UT (2006) Strabismic suppression is mediated by inhibitory interactions in the primary visual cortex. Cereb Cortex 16:1750–1758
Sharma V, Levi DM, Klein SA (2000) Undercounting features and missing features: evidence for a high-level deficit in strabismic amblyopia. Nat Neurosci 3:496–501
Simmers AJ, Ledgeway T, Hess RF, McGraw PV (2003) Deficits to global motion processing in human amblyopia. Vis Res 43:729–738
Simmers AJ, Ledgeway T, Hutchinson CV, Knox PJ (2011) Visual deficits in amblyopia constrain normal models of second-order motion processing. Vis Res 51:2008–2020
Sireteanu R, Fronius M (1981) Naso-temporal asymmetries in human amblyopia: consequence of long-term interocular suppression. Vis Res 21:1055–1063
Sireteanu R, Fronius M (1989) Different patterns of retinal correspondence in the central and peripheral visual field of strabismics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30:2023–2033
Sireteanu R, Fronius M, Singer W (1981) Binocular interaction in the peripheral visual field of humans with strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. Vis Res 21:1065–1074
Stuart JA, Burian HM (1962) A study of separation difficulty. Am J Ophthalmol 53:471–477
Suttle CM, Melmoth DR, Finlay AL, Sloper JJ, Grant S (2011) Eye-hand coordination skills in children with and without amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:1851–1864
Thompson B, Troje NF, Hansen BC, Hess RF (2008) Amblyopic perception of biological motion. J Vis 8:22, 21–14
Tripathy SP, Cavanagh P (2002) The extent of crowding in peripheral vision does not scale with target size. Vis Res 42:2357–2369
Tychsen L, Richards M, Wong A, Foeller P, Bradley D, Burkhalter A (2010) The neural mechanism for Latent (fusion maldevelopment) nystagmus. J neuroophthalmol 30:276–283
Wang C, Waleszczyk WJ, Burke W, Dreher B (2007) Feedback signals from cat's area 21a enhance orientation selectivity of area 17 neurons. Exp Brain Res 182:479–490
Wilson HR (1991) Model of peripheral and amblyopic hyperacuity. Vis Res 31:967–982
Zhou J, Huang PC, Hess RF (2013) Interocular suppression in amblyopia for global orientation processing. J Vis 13(5):19, 1–14
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Daw, N.W. (2014). What Is Amblyopia?. In: Visual Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9059-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9059-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-9058-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-9059-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)