Skip to main content

In Search of Correlation in Multiplicative Congruential Generators with Modulus 231 -1

  • Conference paper
Computer Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the 13th Symposium on the Interface

Abstract

This paper describes an empirical search for correlation in sample sequences produced by 16 multiplicative congruential random number generators with modulus 231 - 1. Each generator has a distinct multiplier. One multiplier is in common use in the LLRANDOM and IMSL random generation packages as well as in APL and SIMPL/1. A second is used in SIMSCRIPT II. Six multipliers were taken from a recent study that showed them to have the best spectral and lattice test properties among 50 multipliers considered. The last eight multipliers had the poorest spectral and lattice test properties for 2-tupes among the 50. A well known poor generator, RANDU, with modulus 231, was also tested to provide a benchmark for evaluating the empirical testing procedure.

A comprehensive analysis based on test statistics derived from cumulative periodograms computed for each multiplier for each of 512 independent replications of 16384 observations each showed evidence of excess high frequency variation in two multipliers and excess midrange frequency variation in three others, including RANDU. Also evidence exists for a bimodal spectral density function for yet another multiplier. An examination of the test results showed that the empirical evidence of a departure from independence did not significantly favor the eight poorest multipliers. This observation is in agreement with a similar observation made by the authors in an earlier study of these multipliers that principally concentrated on their distributional properties in one, two and three dimensions. This consistency raises some doubt as to how one should interpret the results of the spectral and lattice tests for a multiplier. Also, the three multipliers considered superior in the earlier study maintain that position in the current study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson, T. W. and D. A. Darling (1952). “Asymptotic Theory of Certain Goodness of Fit Criteria Based on Stochastic Processes”, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23, 193–212.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, T. W. and D. A. Darling (1954). “A Test of Goodness of Fit”, journal of the Annals of Mathematicals Association, 49, 765–9.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartlett, Maurice S. (1955). An Introduction to Stochastic processes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beyer, W. A., R. B. Roof and Dorothy Williamson (1971). “The Lattice Structure of Multiplicative Congruential Pseudo-Random Vectors”, Mathematic of Computation, 25, 345–63.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Birnbaum, Z. W. and R. Pyke (1958). “On Some Distributions Related to the Statistic D+ n Statistic”, The Annals of Mathematical Statistic, 1 79–87

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Coveyou, R. R. and R. D. MacPherson (1967). “Fourier Analysis of Uniform Random Number Generators”, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 14, 100–19.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Cox, David R. and Peter A. W. Lewis (1966). The Analysis of Series of Events. New York City: Methuen Publishing Co

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Durbin, James (1961). “Some Methods of Constructing Exact Tests”, Biometrika, 48, 41–55.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Durbin, James (1969). “Tests of Serial Independence Based on the Cumulated Periodogram”, Bulletin of the International Satistical Institute, 42, 1039–48.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Durbin, James (1973). Distribution Theory for Tests Based on the Sample Distribution Function. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dwass, Meyer (1958). “On Several Statistics Related to Empirical Distribution Functions”, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29, 188–91.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Fishman, George S. (1978). Principles of Discrete Event Simulation. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Fishman, George S. and Louis R. Moore, III (1978). “A Statistical Evaluation of Multiplicative Congruential Generators with Modulus 231 -1”, Technical Report 78–11, Curriculum in Operations Research and Systems Analysis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gnedenko, B. V. and V. S. Mialevic (1952). “Two Theorems on the Behavior of Empirical Distribution Functions”, Doklady Nauk. SSSR (N.S.), 85, 25–7.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoaglin, David (1976). “Theoretical Properties of Congruential Random-Number Generators: An Empirical View”, Memorandum NS-340, Department of Statistics, Harvard Universtiy.

    Google Scholar 

  16. IBM (1972). SIMPL/1 Program Reference Manual. SH19–5060-0.

    Google Scholar 

  17. International Mathematical and Statistical Libraries, Inc. (1977). IMSL Library, Houston, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Katzan, H., Jr. (1971). APL user’s Guide. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Learmonth, G. and P. A. W. Lewis (1973). “Naval Postgraduate School Random Number Generator Package LLRANDOM, “Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lewis, Peter A. W. (1960). “Distribution of the Anderson-Darling Statistic”, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1118–24.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lewis, Peter A. W., A. S. Goodman and J. M. Miller (1969). “A Pseudo-Random Number Generator for the System 350”, IBM Systems Journal, 8(2), 136–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Marsaglia, George (1972). “The Structure of Linear Congruentia1 Sequences”, in Apptications of Number Theory to Numerical Analysis, ed. S. K. Zaremba, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pyke, R. (1959). “The Supremum and Infimum of the Poisson Process”, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 5 68–76.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Smirnov, N. V. (1939). “Sur les ecarts de la courbe de distribution empirique”, (French summary), Rec.Math., 6, 3–26.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fishman, G.S., Moore, L.R. (1981). In Search of Correlation in Multiplicative Congruential Generators with Modulus 231 -1. In: Eddy, W.F. (eds) Computer Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the 13th Symposium on the Interface. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9464-8_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9464-8_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-90633-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-9464-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics