Abstract
Initially the development of man’s position in road transport is described and analyzed. It is shown that the large changes have to do with the lack of feedback, new situations from physiological point of view and especially the higher speeds.
The part played by human and technical errors in road accidents is discussed. It is found that most investigations attribute a dominating part to human errors. Although this is believed to be more of an artifact than a true description the results can be used for further analysis. Such an analysis shows that the two most frequent human errors are inadequate human information acquisition and information processing.
A simple descriptive model of the driver in traffic is presented. It is suggested that man’s inherited limitations and lack of appropriate experience result in systematic errors in information acquisition and processing. Two inserted constructs
-
• a perceptual filter
-
• a cognitive filter
are used to describe road user errors and to generate hypotheses and suggestions of how to meet and overcome some inadequate road user behavior. Special high risk situations (night traffic, peripheral detection, speed) and special high risk groups (inexperienced young drivers), are used to illustrate the ideas in the descriptive model
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cole, B.L. & Jenkings, S.E. Conspicuity of traffic control devices. Austrialian Road Research Board. Internal report, 1978.
Durth, W. Die optischen Informationen als Kriterien fiir die Gestaltung der Uberholstrecke. Strassenbau, Verkehrstechnik und Verkehrssicherheit. 1971, 75, 31–32.
Englund, A. & Pettersson, H.E. The accident commision of the Insurance companies (in Swedish). Road Safety Committee (TRK) Rapport 1, Stockholm. 1978.
Evans, L. & Wasielewski, P. Do accident-involved drivers exhibit riskier everyday driving behavior. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 4, 57–64, 1982.
Gibson, J.J. The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin, Boston. 1966.
Goeller, B.F. Modeling the traffic safety system. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1, 167–204. 1969.
Haight, F.A. Road safety: A perspective and a new strategy. The Pennsylvania Transportation Institute, USA. Working paper 29, 1983.
Helmers, G. & Aberg, L. Driver behavior in intersections as related to priority rules and road design. National Swedish Road and Traffic Research Institute (VTI). VTI Rapport 167. 1978.
Johansson, R. The relation between subjective and objective accident risk. (In Swedish) Transport Research Delegation, Sweden. Report 1982: 9.
Johansson, G. & Rumar, K. Drivers and road signs. Ergonomics 9, 57–62. 1966.
Johansson, G. & Backlund, F. Drivers and road signs. Ergonomics 13, 6, 1970.
Klebelsberg, D. & Kallina, H., Wieviele Verkehrszeichen können gleichzeitig wahrgenommen werden? Kriminalistik, 14, 1960.
Nygaard, B. A pilot study of the effect of feedback at a pedestrian crossing. National Swedish Road and Traffic Research Institute (VTI). Memo. 1981.
Rumar, K. The visual environment in road traffic. Proceedings from CIE 19th Session, Kyoto, Japan, Publication 50. Paper 79–01. 1980.
Rumar, K. Daylight running lights in Sweden—Pre-studies and experiences. SAE Technical Paper 810191. Detroit. 1981.
Rumar, K. The human factor in road safety. Invited paper to the 11th Australian Road Research Board Annual Conference, 1981, Proceedings, 11, Part 1, 63–80, 1982.
Sabey, B.E. & Staughton, G.C. Interacting roles of road environment, vehicle and road user in accidents. 5th International Conference of the International Association for Accident and Traffic Medicine, London, 1975.
Spolander, K. Accident risks of drivers—a model tested on man and woman (in Swedish) Swedish Road and Traffic Research Institute (VTI). Rapport 260. 1983.
Sten T. Safety marginals by driving. (in Norwegian) Technical University of Norway. Internal report. 1979.
Summala, H. & Näätänen, R. Perception of highway traffic signs and motivation. Journal of Safety Research, 6, 4. 1974.
Summala, H. & Hietamäki, J. Drivers immediate response to traffic signs. Ergonomics, 27, 2, 205–216, 1984.
Treat, J.R. A study of precrash factors involved in traffic accidents. Highway Safety Research Institute (HSRI). USA. The HSRI Research Review 10, 6, 11, 1. 1980.
Turtola, K. Perception of simultaneously presented traffic signs. Universiy of Tampere, Finland, Report 42, 1969.
Undeutsch, U. Die Auffassungsfähigkeit für Verkehrszeichen. Zeitschrift fiXr Verkehrssicherheit, 9, 1963.
Wilde, G.J.S. Objective and subjective risk in drivers’ response to road condi- tons: The implications of the theory of risk homeostasis for accident aetiology and prevention. Seminar on the Implications of Risk Taking Theories for Traffic Safety, West-Berlin. 1981.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rumar, K. (1985). The Role of Perceptual and Cognitive Filters in Observed Behavior. In: Evans, L., Schwing, R.C. (eds) Human Behavior and Traffic Safety. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2173-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2173-6_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9280-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-2173-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive