Skip to main content

Perceiving Design as Modelling: A Cybernetic Systems Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design

Abstract

The creation and use of models is central to engineering design, to the extent that designing might be perceived as a propagation from model to model and modelling may be described as the language of the designer (the terms product model and artefact model are used synonymously throughout this chapter). Given this, how should design activities be coordinated and how should the design process be regulated? This chapter suggests that a cybernetic perspective may help to understand designing as a self-regulated modelling system and help to reach a better understanding of the effectiveness of models and modelling as used in design. This perspective emphasises the role of models in progressing the design and design process evolution. In particular, it suggests that most models in design fulfil a synthetic role. For instance, when designers sketch a mechanism, then formalise and analyse it, they are on one level analysing, but stepping back they are synthesising something that did not previously exist. What makes a model a good model thus lies not so much in goodness of fit, meaning how accurately it represents observations made, but rather the degree to which it informs decision-making that turns out to add value for a given purpose and context. Implications of a cybernetic perspective that could guide effective modelling in design are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Albers A, Braun A (2011) A generalized framework to compass and to support complex product engineering processes. Int J of Prod Dev 15(1):6–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andreasen MM (1994) Modelling—the language of the designer. J Eng Des 5(2):103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Argyris C, Schön DA (1978) Organisational learning. a theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ashby WR (1956) Principles of self organizing systems. Aldine, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ashby WR (1965) An introduction to cybernetics. Chapman and Hall Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  6. Browning TR, Fricke E, Negele H (2006) Key concepts in modeling product development processes. Syst Eng 9(2):104–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Browning TR (2009) The many views of a process: toward a process architecture framework for product development processes. Syst Eng 12(1):69–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Buur J, Andreasen MM (1989) Design models in mechatronic product development. Des Stud 10(3):155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Buxton B (2007) Sketching user experiences: getting the design right and the right design (interactive technologies). Morgan Kaufmann, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  10. Christensen ME, Howard TJ, Rasmussen JJ (2012) The foundation for robust design: enabling robustness through kinematic design and design clarity. In: Proceedings of the 12th international design conference DESIGN 2012, pp 817–826)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Crilly N, Maier AM, Clarkson PJ (2008) Representing artefacts as media: modelling the relationship between designer intent and consumer experience. Int J Des 2(3):15–27

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cuff D (1992) Architecture: the story of practice. MIT Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deutsch KW (1952) On communication models in the social sciences. Pub Opin Quart 16(3):356–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eckert CM, Stacey MK (2010) What is a Process Model? Reflections on the epistemology of process models. In: Heisig P, Clarkson PJ, Vajna S (eds) Modelling and management of engineering processes. Springer, New York, pp 3–14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Engwall M, Kling R, Werr A (2005) Models in action: how management models are interpreted in new product development. R&D Manag 35(4):427–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferguson ES (2001) Engineering and the Mind’s Eye. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  17. Frigg R, Hartmann S (2012) Models in Science. In: Edward NZ (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2012 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=models-science

  18. Gericke K, Blessing L (2011) Comparisons of design methodologies and process models across disciplines: a literature review. In: ICED 11–18th international conference on engineering design—impacting society through engineering design vol 1, pp. 393–404

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goldschmidt G (1995) The designer as a team of one. Des Stud 16(2):189–209

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Henderson K (1999) On line and on paper: visual representations, visual culture, and computer graphics in design engineering. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  21. Heylighen F (1992) Principles of Systems and Cybernetics: an evolutionary perspective. In: Trappl R (ed) Cybernetics and systems’92. World Science, Singapore, pp 3–10

    Google Scholar 

  22. Howard TJ, Culley SJ, Dekoninck E (2008) Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Des Stud 29(2):160–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hubka V, Eder EW (1987) A scientific approach to engineering design. Des Stud 8:123–137

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kavakli M, Gero JS (2001) Sketching as mental imagery processing. Des Stud 22(4):347–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lloyd EA (1998) Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  26. Luhmann N (1984) Soziale Systeme. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  27. Luhmann N (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  28. Maier AM, Eckert CM, Clarkson PJ (2005) A meta-model for communication in engineering design. CoDesign 1(4):243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Maier A, Störrle H (2011) What are the characteristics of engineering design processes? In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on engineering design, vol 1 Design P, pp 188–198)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Maier A, Wynn DC, Andreasen MM, Clarkson PJ (2012) A cybernetic perspective on methods and process models in collaborative designing. In: Marjanovic D, Storga M, Pavkovic N, Bojcetic N (eds) Proceedings of the 12th international design conference DESIGN 2012, pp 233–240

    Google Scholar 

  31. Maier MW, Rechtin E (2002) The art of systems architecting, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  32. McLuhan M (1964) Understanding media: the extensions of man. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  33. Morris M (2006) Models: architecture and the miniature. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ozgur E (2004) Effective inquiry for innovative engineering design. Kluwer Acadmic Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pask G (1975) The cybernetics of human learning and performance. Hutchinson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  36. Roozenburg NFM, Eekels J (1995) Product design, fundamentals and methods. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  37. Roth K (1986) Modellbildung fuer das methodische Konstruieren ohne und mit Rechnerunterstuetzung. VDI Zeitschrift, 128

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sass L, Oxman R (2006) Materializing design: the implications of rapid prototyping in digital design. Des Stud 27(3):325–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Schön DA (1992) Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Knowl-Based Syst 5(1):3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Simon HA (1969) The sciences of the artificial. Institue of Technology Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  41. Smith RP, Morrow JA (1999) Product development process modeling. Des Stud 20(3):237–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tjalve E, Andreasen MM, Schmidt FF (1979) Engineering graphic modelling: a practical guide to drawing and dseign. Newness Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

  43. Van Fraassen B (2008) Scientific representation: paradoxes of perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  44. Von Foerster H (2002) Understanding understanding: essays on cybernetics and cognition. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wartofsky MW (1979) Models: representation and scientific understanding. Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wiener N (1948) Cybernetics, or Communication and Control in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wynn DC (2007) Model-based approaches to support process improvement in complex product development. University of Cambridge: Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wynn DC, Clarkson PJ (2005) Models of designing. In: Clarkson PJ, Eckert C (eds) Design process improvement—a review of current practice. Springer, London, pp 34–59

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  49. Wynn DC, Eckert CM, Clarkson PJ (2007) Modelling iteration in engineering design. In: Bocquet J.-C (ed) Proceedings of 16th international conference on engineering design, Design Society, Paris (paper id: 561)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wynn DC, Maier AM, Clarkson PJ (2010) How can PD process modelling be made more useful? In: Marjanovic D, Storga M, Pavkovic N, Bojcetic N (eds) Proceedings of the 11th international design conference DESIGN 2010, pp 511–522

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish thank the two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and the following people for stimulating discussions on modelling and models in designing which influenced the thoughts and arguments proposed in this chapter: Tyson Browning, P. John Clarkson, Jaap Daalhuizen, Claudia Eckert, Boris Eisenbart, Kilian Gericke, Khadidja Grebici, Ralf Stetter, Harald Störrle and Ken Wallace.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anja M. Maier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maier, A.M., Wynn, D.C., Howard, T.J., Andreasen, M.M. (2014). Perceiving Design as Modelling: A Cybernetic Systems Perspective. In: Chakrabarti, A., Blessing, L. (eds) An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6338-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6338-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6337-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6338-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics