Abstract
The creation and use of models is central to engineering design, to the extent that designing might be perceived as a propagation from model to model and modelling may be described as the language of the designer (the terms product model and artefact model are used synonymously throughout this chapter). Given this, how should design activities be coordinated and how should the design process be regulated? This chapter suggests that a cybernetic perspective may help to understand designing as a self-regulated modelling system and help to reach a better understanding of the effectiveness of models and modelling as used in design. This perspective emphasises the role of models in progressing the design and design process evolution. In particular, it suggests that most models in design fulfil a synthetic role. For instance, when designers sketch a mechanism, then formalise and analyse it, they are on one level analysing, but stepping back they are synthesising something that did not previously exist. What makes a model a good model thus lies not so much in goodness of fit, meaning how accurately it represents observations made, but rather the degree to which it informs decision-making that turns out to add value for a given purpose and context. Implications of a cybernetic perspective that could guide effective modelling in design are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albers A, Braun A (2011) A generalized framework to compass and to support complex product engineering processes. Int J of Prod Dev 15(1):6–25
Andreasen MM (1994) Modelling—the language of the designer. J Eng Des 5(2):103–115
Argyris C, Schön DA (1978) Organisational learning. a theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts
Ashby WR (1956) Principles of self organizing systems. Aldine, Chicago
Ashby WR (1965) An introduction to cybernetics. Chapman and Hall Ltd, London
Browning TR, Fricke E, Negele H (2006) Key concepts in modeling product development processes. Syst Eng 9(2):104–128
Browning TR (2009) The many views of a process: toward a process architecture framework for product development processes. Syst Eng 12(1):69–90
Buur J, Andreasen MM (1989) Design models in mechatronic product development. Des Stud 10(3):155–162
Buxton B (2007) Sketching user experiences: getting the design right and the right design (interactive technologies). Morgan Kaufmann, Massachusetts
Christensen ME, Howard TJ, Rasmussen JJ (2012) The foundation for robust design: enabling robustness through kinematic design and design clarity. In: Proceedings of the 12th international design conference DESIGN 2012, pp 817–826)
Crilly N, Maier AM, Clarkson PJ (2008) Representing artefacts as media: modelling the relationship between designer intent and consumer experience. Int J Des 2(3):15–27
Cuff D (1992) Architecture: the story of practice. MIT Press, Boston
Deutsch KW (1952) On communication models in the social sciences. Pub Opin Quart 16(3):356–380
Eckert CM, Stacey MK (2010) What is a Process Model? Reflections on the epistemology of process models. In: Heisig P, Clarkson PJ, Vajna S (eds) Modelling and management of engineering processes. Springer, New York, pp 3–14
Engwall M, Kling R, Werr A (2005) Models in action: how management models are interpreted in new product development. R&D Manag 35(4):427–439
Ferguson ES (2001) Engineering and the Mind’s Eye. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Frigg R, Hartmann S (2012) Models in Science. In: Edward NZ (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2012 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=models-science
Gericke K, Blessing L (2011) Comparisons of design methodologies and process models across disciplines: a literature review. In: ICED 11–18th international conference on engineering design—impacting society through engineering design vol 1, pp. 393–404
Goldschmidt G (1995) The designer as a team of one. Des Stud 16(2):189–209
Henderson K (1999) On line and on paper: visual representations, visual culture, and computer graphics in design engineering. MIT Press, Cambridge
Heylighen F (1992) Principles of Systems and Cybernetics: an evolutionary perspective. In: Trappl R (ed) Cybernetics and systems’92. World Science, Singapore, pp 3–10
Howard TJ, Culley SJ, Dekoninck E (2008) Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Des Stud 29(2):160–180
Hubka V, Eder EW (1987) A scientific approach to engineering design. Des Stud 8:123–137
Kavakli M, Gero JS (2001) Sketching as mental imagery processing. Des Stud 22(4):347–364
Lloyd EA (1998) Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy. Routledge, London
Luhmann N (1984) Soziale Systeme. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main
Luhmann N (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Maier AM, Eckert CM, Clarkson PJ (2005) A meta-model for communication in engineering design. CoDesign 1(4):243–254
Maier A, Störrle H (2011) What are the characteristics of engineering design processes? In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on engineering design, vol 1 Design P, pp 188–198)
Maier A, Wynn DC, Andreasen MM, Clarkson PJ (2012) A cybernetic perspective on methods and process models in collaborative designing. In: Marjanovic D, Storga M, Pavkovic N, Bojcetic N (eds) Proceedings of the 12th international design conference DESIGN 2012, pp 233–240
Maier MW, Rechtin E (2002) The art of systems architecting, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
McLuhan M (1964) Understanding media: the extensions of man. McGraw-Hill, New York
Morris M (2006) Models: architecture and the miniature. Wiley, Chichester
Ozgur E (2004) Effective inquiry for innovative engineering design. Kluwer Acadmic Publishers, Boston
Pask G (1975) The cybernetics of human learning and performance. Hutchinson, Paris
Roozenburg NFM, Eekels J (1995) Product design, fundamentals and methods. Wiley, Chichester
Roth K (1986) Modellbildung fuer das methodische Konstruieren ohne und mit Rechnerunterstuetzung. VDI Zeitschrift, 128
Sass L, Oxman R (2006) Materializing design: the implications of rapid prototyping in digital design. Des Stud 27(3):325–355
Schön DA (1992) Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Knowl-Based Syst 5(1):3–14
Simon HA (1969) The sciences of the artificial. Institue of Technology Press, Cambridge
Smith RP, Morrow JA (1999) Product development process modeling. Des Stud 20(3):237–261
Tjalve E, Andreasen MM, Schmidt FF (1979) Engineering graphic modelling: a practical guide to drawing and dseign. Newness Butterworths, London
Van Fraassen B (2008) Scientific representation: paradoxes of perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Von Foerster H (2002) Understanding understanding: essays on cybernetics and cognition. Springer, New York
Wartofsky MW (1979) Models: representation and scientific understanding. Macmillan, Basingstoke
Wiener N (1948) Cybernetics, or Communication and Control in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge: MIT Press
Wynn DC (2007) Model-based approaches to support process improvement in complex product development. University of Cambridge: Cambridge
Wynn DC, Clarkson PJ (2005) Models of designing. In: Clarkson PJ, Eckert C (eds) Design process improvement—a review of current practice. Springer, London, pp 34–59
Wynn DC, Eckert CM, Clarkson PJ (2007) Modelling iteration in engineering design. In: Bocquet J.-C (ed) Proceedings of 16th international conference on engineering design, Design Society, Paris (paper id: 561)
Wynn DC, Maier AM, Clarkson PJ (2010) How can PD process modelling be made more useful? In: Marjanovic D, Storga M, Pavkovic N, Bojcetic N (eds) Proceedings of the 11th international design conference DESIGN 2010, pp 511–522
Acknowledgments
The authors wish thank the two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and the following people for stimulating discussions on modelling and models in designing which influenced the thoughts and arguments proposed in this chapter: Tyson Browning, P. John Clarkson, Jaap Daalhuizen, Claudia Eckert, Boris Eisenbart, Kilian Gericke, Khadidja Grebici, Ralf Stetter, Harald Störrle and Ken Wallace.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maier, A.M., Wynn, D.C., Howard, T.J., Andreasen, M.M. (2014). Perceiving Design as Modelling: A Cybernetic Systems Perspective. In: Chakrabarti, A., Blessing, L. (eds) An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6338-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6338-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6337-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6338-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)