Skip to main content

The Dismembered Body

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Essentials of Autopsy Practice

Abstract

This chapter presents a personal approach to the investigation of a dismembered body, exampled by the investigation of a dismembered limb from a homicide. It first presents an overview of the number of dismemberments encountered each year in England and Wales, the anatomical site at which the dismemberment is usually achieved, and common sites of disposal. It then presents an overview from a pathological viewpoint of an approach from scene to mortuary in considering the four standard questions of who the person was, where, when, and by what means they came by their death. By taking such an approach, it demonstrates how much information can be gained for the investigating police force by the examination of just a limb. The second part of the chapter then considers from an engineering viewpoint the instruments that may have been used to dismember the body and which methods can be used to identify the said instrument. Thus the chapter provides an overall approach to the investigation of a dismembered body.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.fosterfreeman.com/index.php last visited March 2013.

  2. 2.

    2http://www.interpol.int/INTERPOL-expertise/Forensics/DVI-Pages/Disaster-victim-recovery-form.

References

  1. Reichs KJ. Postmortem dismemberment: recovery, analysis and interpretation. In: Reichs KJ, editor. Forensic osteology – advances in the identification of human remains. Springfield: Charles C Thomas; 1998. p. 353–88.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Symes SA. Suitcase man: the investigation, forensic analysis and prosecution of a homicide with postmortem dismemberment. In: Proc 60th Ann Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, 14. Washington, DC/Colorado Springs: American Academy of Forensic Sciences; 2008. p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Randall B. Blood and tissue spatter associated with chainsaw dismemberment. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54:1310–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dogan KH, Demirci S, Deniz I, Erkol Z. Decapitation and dismemberment of the corpse: a matricide case. J Forensic Sci. 2010;55:542–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Racette R, Tho Vo T, Sauvageau A. Suicidal decapitation using a tractor loader: case report and review of the literature. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52:192–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Byard RW, Gilbert JD. Characteristic features of deaths due to decapitation. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2004;25:129–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsokos M, Turk EE, Uchigasaki S, Puschel K. Pathologic features of suicidal complete decapitations. Forensic Sci Int. 2004;139:95–102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Morild I, Lilleng PK. Different mechanisms of decapitation: three classic and one unique case history. J Forensic Sci. 2012;57(6):1659–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brough AL, Rutty GN, Black S, Morgan B. Post-mortem computed tomography and 3D imaging: anthropological applications for juvenile remains. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012;8(3):270–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rutty GN, Robinson C, Morgan B, Black S, Adams C, Webster P. Fimag: the United Kingdom disaster victim/forensic identification imaging system. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54(6):1438–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Robinson C, Eisma R, Morgan B, Jeffery A, Graham EA, Black S, Rutty GN. Anthropological measurement of lower limb and foot bones using multi-detector computed tomography. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53(6):1289–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fraser I, Meier-Augenstein W. Stable (2)H isotope analysis of modern-day human hair and nails can aid forensic human identification. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2007;21(20):3279–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Westen AA, Gerretsen RR, Maat GJ. Femur, rib, and tooth sample collection for DNA analysis in disaster victim identification (DVI): a method to minimize contamination risk. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2008;4(1):15–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zinka B, Kandlbinder R, Schupfner R, Haas G, Wolfbeis OS, Graw M. The activity ratio of 228Th to 228Ra in bone tissue of recently deceased humans: a new dating method in forensic examinations. Anthropol Anz. 2012;69(2):147–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schrag B, Uldin T, Mangin P, Froidevaux P. Dating human skeletal remains using a radiometric method: biogenic versus diagenetic 90Sr and 210Pb in vertebrae. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;220(1–3):271–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. van de Goot FRW. The chronological dating of injury. In: Rutty GN, editor. Essentials of autopsy practice new advances, trends and developments. London: Springer; 2008. p. 167–81.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Schäfer AT, Kaufmann JD. What happens in freezing bodies? Experimental study of histological tissue change caused by freezing injuries. Forensic Sci Int. 1999;102(2–3):149–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mairs S, Swift B, Rutty GN. Detergent: an alternative approach to traditional bone cleaning methods for forensic practice. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2004;25:276–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Symes SA. Morphology of saw marks in human bone: Introduction and examination of residual kerf contour. In: Reichs KJ, editor. Forensic osteology, advances in the identification of human remains. Springfield: Charles C Thomas; 1998. p. 389–409.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saville PA, Hainsworth SV, Rutty GN. Cutting crime: the analysis of the “uniqueness” of saw marks on bone. Int J Legal Med. 2007;121:349–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Burd DQ, Kirk PL. Tool marks, factors involved in their comparison and use as evidence. J Crim Law Criminol. 1942;32:679–86.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Petraco N. Color atlas of forensic toolmark identification. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jones LV. Locating and preserving evidence in criminal cases. Am Jur Trials. 1964;555:616.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Andahl RO. The examination of saw marks. J Forensic Sci Soc. 1978;18:31–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bonte W. Tool marks in bones and cartilage. J Forensic Sci. 1975;20:315–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bailey JA, Wang Y, van de Goot FR, Gerretsen RRR. Statistical analysis of kerf mark measurements in bone. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2011;7:53–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Walker PL, Long JC. An experimental study of the morphological characteristics of tool marks. Am Antiq. 1997;42:605–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lewis JE. Identifying sword marks on bone: criteria for distinguishing between cut marks made by different classes of bladed weapons. J Archaeol Sci. 2008;35:2001–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shaw KP, Chung J-H, Chung FC, Tseng BY, Pan CH, Yang KT, Yang C-H. A method for studying knife tool marks on bone. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56:967–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Humphrey JH, Hutchinson DL. Macroscopic characteristics of hacking trauma. J Forensic Sci. 2001;46:228–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lynn KS, Fairgrieve SI. Microscopic indicators of axe and hatchet trauma in fleshed and defleshed mammalian long bones. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54:793–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Katterwe H, Goebel R, Grooss KD. The comparison scanning electron microscope within the field of forensic science. Scan Electron Microsc. 1982;(Pt 2):499–504.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Katterwe H. Modern approaches for the examination of toolmarks and other surface marks. Forensic Sci Rev. 1996;8:46–72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guy N. Rutty MBE, MBBS, MD, FRCPath, DipRCPath (Forensic), FFFLM, FFSSoc .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rutty, G.N., Hainsworth, S.V. (2014). The Dismembered Body. In: Rutty, G. (eds) Essentials of Autopsy Practice. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5270-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5270-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5269-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5270-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics