Skip to main content

Visual Presentation as a Welcome Alternative to Textual Presentation of Gene Annotation Information

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Computational Biology

Abstract

The functions of a gene are traditionally annotated textually using either free text (Gene Reference Into Function or GeneRIF) or controlled vocabularies (e.g., Gene Ontology or Disease Ontology). Inspired by the latest word cloud tools developed by the Information Visualization Group at IBM Research, we have prototyped a visual system for capturing gene annotations, which we named Gene Graph Into Function or GeneGIF. Fully developing the GeneGIF system would be a significant effort. To justify the necessity and to specify the design requirements of GeneGIF, we first surveyed the end-user preferences. From 53 responses, we found that a majority (64%, p < 0.05) of the users were either positive or neutral toward using GeneGIF in their daily work (acceptance); in terms of preference, a slight majority (51%, p > 0.05) of the users favored visual presentation of information (GeneGIF) compared to textual (GeneRIF) information. The results of this study indicate that a visual presentation tool, such as GeneGIF, can complement standard textual presentation of gene annotations. Moreover, the survey participants provided many constructive comments that will specify the development of a phase-two project (http://128.248.174.241/) to visually annotate each gene in the human genome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ashburner, M., C. A. Ball, et al. (2000). “Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.” Nature Genetics 25(1): 25–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Childers, T. L., M. J. Houston, et al. (1985). “Measurement of individual-differences in visual versus verbal information-processing.” Journal of Consumer Research 12(2): 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Harris, M. A., J. Clark, et al. (2004). “The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource.” Nucleic Acids Research 32(Database issue): D258–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Maglott, D., J. Ostell, et al. (2007). “Entrez Gene: gene-centered information at NCBI.” Nucleic Acids Research 35(Database issue): D26–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Osborne, J. D., J. Flatow, et al. (2009). “Annotating the human genome with disease ontology.” BMC Genomics 10(Suppl 1):S6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Osborne, J. D., S. Lin, et al. (2007). “Other riffs on cooperation are already showing how well a wiki could work.” Nature 446(7138): 856.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Plass, J. L., D. M. Chun, et al. (1998). “Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment.” Journal of Educational Psychology 90(1): 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Weiss, S. M. (2005). Text mining : predictive methods for analyzing unstructured information. New York, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Willett, P. (2006). “The Porter stemming algorithm: then and now.” Program-Electronic Library and Information Systems 40(3): 219–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wyer, R. S., Y. W. Jiang, et al. (2008). “Visual and verbal information processing in a consumer context: Further considerations.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 18(4): 276–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Martin Wattenberg, Matthew M Mckeon, and Jonathan Feinberg at IBM Research for helpful discussion of Wordle and comments on this manuscript. The authors would also like to thank Rhett Sutphin at NUCATS for exploring the application programing interface to Wordle.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Warren A. Kibbe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Desai, J. et al. (2010). Visual Presentation as a Welcome Alternative to Textual Presentation of Gene Annotation Information. In: Arabnia, H. (eds) Advances in Computational Biology. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 680. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5913-3_79

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics