Abstract
A long-term naturalistic study reveals how artists designed, visitors experienced, and curators and technicians maintained a public interactive artwork over a four year period. The work consisted of a collaborative augmented reality game that ran across eleven networked displays (screens and footpads) that were deployed along a winding ramp in a purpose-built gallery. Reflections on design meetings and documentation show how the artists responded to this architectural setting and addressed issues of personalisation, visitor flow, attracting spectators, linking real and virtual, and accessibility. Observations of visitors reveal that while their interactions broadly followed the artists’ design, there was far more flexible engagement than originally anticipated, especially within visiting groups, while interviews with curators and technicians reveal how the work was subsequently maintained and ultimately reconfigured. Our findings extend discussions of ‘interactional trajectories’ within CSCW, affirming the relevance of this concept to describing collaboration in cultural settings, but also suggesting how it needs to be extended to better reflect group interactions at multiple levels of scale.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aoki, P., Grinter, R., Hurst, A., Szymanski, M., Thornton, J. & Woodruff, A (2002); ‘Sotto voce: exploring the interplay of conversation and mobile audio spaces’, Proc. CHI, pp. 431–438, ACM.
Bell, G. (2002): Making Sense of Museums, Intel Labs.
Benford, S., Giannachi, G., Koleva, B. & Rodden, T. (2009): ‘From Interaction to Trajectories: Designing Coherent Journeys Through User Experiences’, Proc. CHI, pp. 709–718, ACM.
Brignull, H. & Rogers, Y. (2003): ‘Enticing people to Interact with Large Public Displays in Public Spaces’, Proc. Interact, pp. 17–24, IOS Press, IFIP.
Brown, B., MacColl, I., Chalmers, M., Galani, A., Randell, C. & Steed, A., (2003): ‘Lessons From the Lighthouse: Collaboration in a Shared Mixed Reality System’, Proc. CHI, pp. 577–584, ACM.
Costello, B., Muller, L., Amitani, S. & Edmonds, E. (2005): ‘Understanding the Experience of Interactive Art: Iamascope in Beta_space’, Proc. 2nd Australasian Conference on Interactive entertainment, Sydney.
Crabtree, A & Rodden, T. (2008): ‘Hybrid Ecologies: Understanding Cooperative Interaction in Emerging Physical Digital Environments’, Personal & Ubiquitous Computing, 12:481–493, Springer.
Dix, A., (1997): ‘Challenges for cooperative work on the web: An analytical approach’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 6(2–3):135–156.
Fraser, M., Stanton, D, Ng, K., Benford, S., O’Malley, C., Bowers,J., Taxen, G., Ferris, K., Hindmarsh, J., (2003): ‘Assembling history: achieving coherent experiences with diverse technologies’, Proc ECSCW, Kluwer.
Gaver, W., Sellen, A., Heath, C., & Luff, P., (1993): ‘One is not enough: multiple views in a media space’, Proc. CHI, pp. 335–341, ACM.
Heath, C. & vom Lehn, D. (2002): ‘Misconstruing interactivity’, Proc. Interactive Learning in Museums of Art and Design, Victoria and Albert Museum, 2002.
Hindmarsh, J., Heath, C., vom Lehn, D., & Cleverly, J., (2005): ‘Creating assemblies in public environments’, Journal of CSCW, 14(1):1–41, Kluwer.
Hornecker, E. & Buur, J. (2006): ‘Getting a grip on tangible interaction, Proc. CHI, pp. 437–446, ACM.
Koleva, B., Egglestone, S., Schnädelbach, H., Glover, K., Greenhalgh, C. & Rodden, T. (2009): ‘Supporting the creation of hybrid museum experiences’, Proc. CHI, pp. 1973–1982, ACM.
Mazalek, A., Winegarden, C., Al-Haddad, T., Robinson, S., & We, C., (2009): ‘Architales: physical/digital co-design of an interactive story table’, Proc. TEI, pp. 241–248, ACM.
Nardi, B. & O’Day, V. (1999): ‘Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart’, pp. 49–58, MIT Press.
Not, E., Peterelli D., Stock O., Strapparava C., & Zancanaro M., (1997): ‘Person-oriented guided visits in a physical museum.’, Proc. ICHIM’97, Archives and Museum Informatics.
Reeves, S., Benford, S., O’Malley, C. & Fraser, M., (2005): ‘Designing the spectator interface’, Proc. CHI, pp. 741–750, ACM.
Smith, J., (2006): ‘Digital Dance Hall: The Fan Culture of Dance Simulation Arcade Games.’, Consuming Music Together pp. 193–210, Springer.
Snibbe, S. & Raffle, H., (2009): ‘Social Immersive Media Pursuing Best Practices for Multi-user Interactive Camera/projector Exhibits’, Proc. CHI, pp. 1447–1456, ACM.
Terrenghi, L., Quigley, A. & Dix, A. (2009|): ‘A Taxonomy for and Analysis of Multi-Person-Display Ecosystems’, Personal & Ubiquitous Computing, 13:853–598, Springer.
vom Lehn, D., Heath, C. & Knoblauch, H., (2001): ‘Configuring exhibits’, Verbal Art Across Cultures, pp. 281–297, Gunter Narr Verlag Tubingen.
vom Lehn, D., Hindmarsh, J., Luff, P. & Heath, C. (2007): ‘Engaging constable: revealing art with new technology’, Proc. CHI, pp. 1485–1494, ACM.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Flintham, M. et al. (2011). Flypad: Designing Trajectories in a Large-Scale Permanent Augmented Reality Installation. In: Bødker, S., Bouvin, N., Wulf, V., Ciolfi, L., Lutters, W. (eds) ECSCW 2011: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 24-28 September 2011, Aarhus Denmark. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-913-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-913-0_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-912-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-913-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)