Skip to main content

The Experimental Methodology of Constructive Microgenesis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dynamic Process Methodology in the Social and Developmental Sciences

Abstract

Psychologists congratulate themselves in telling their discipline’s history as a linear progression to its present state, as if psychology was purely rational and free from all historical contingency. In so doing we close ourselves to past ideas that were unjustly left behind and which can make a significant contribution to psychology today. The word ‘experiment’, for example, has taken on a very narrow meaning in contemporary psychology. We are told that for something to be an experiment there must be an independent and dependent variable, a large random sample of participants, and a statistical analysis of scores. These requirements were foreign to psychology in the first half of this last century and only became social norms through influences outside of psychology, such as the military and education (Danziger, 1990).

(T)he search for method becomes one of the most important problems of the entire enterprise of understanding the uniquely human forms of psychological activity. In this case, the method is simultaneously prerequisite and product, the tool and the result of the study.

Vygotsky (1987, p. 27)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    One could also call this approach an “Einsteinian” experimental methodology (see Holton, 1988).

  2. 2.

    A general history of the microgenetic method is not our focus here. It can be found in Catán (1986) and Valsiner and van der Veer (2000, Chapter 7).

  3. 3.

    I chose these three because they are classic studies in the microgenetic tradition which are different enough to allow for broad comparisons. Additionally, Vygotsky and Bartlett’s experiments are milestones in the socio-cultural study of remembering, while Werner’s helps us to conceptualize the process by which we struggle to articulate a memory that we are feeling but cannot yet precisely describe (i.e. the ‘tip-of-the-tongue’ phenomenon).

  4. 4.

    Vygotsky also refers to his method as the “experimental genetic method,” “instrumental method” and “historical-genetic method” (Engeström, 2007).

  5. 5.

    Not everything on the inter-mental plan is internalized, only that for which there is dramatic conflict, i.e. a problem that creates inner tension. Similarly, when the child later encounters a problem intra-mentally he or she will utilize means borrowed from an inter-mental drama to overcome it (see Veresov, 2008).

  6. 6.

    Bartlett, as well as Werner and Vygotsky, clearly believed in “the unity of mentality” (Edwards & Middleton, 1987): Any demarcation between the mind’s processes will be arbitrary because the mind is a systemically functioning totality.

  7. 7.

    See van der Veer and Valsiner (1991).

  8. 8.

    This influence is particularly evident in Bartlett’s St. Johns fellowship dissertation (1916). Later in his life he is more dismissive of the Würzburg School’s accomplishments (see Bartlett, 1951).

  9. 9.

    See Diriwätcher (this volume) for the Würzburger’s influence on the second Leipzig school.

  10. 10.

    It should be noted that Bartlett’s own concept of ‘attitude’ is extremely close to the Würzburger’s early concept of Bewusstseinslage, literally “position of consciousness”. It was first mistranslated by Titchener (1909) as “attitude” and later by Boring (1950) as ‘conscious attitude’ (see Danziger, 1997, Chapter 8). Kusch’s (1999) recent translation as ‘situation of consciousness’ comes closer to the original though perhaps misses its directed character. The concept encompassed a whole range of phenomena from feelings of surprise, excitement and familiarity to expectation, coercion, contrast and agreement (see Larsen & Bernsten, 2000, for comparison with Bartlett).

  11. 11.

    Edwards and Middleton (1987) point out that Bartlett conversed with his participants during his experiments and used this data to interpret their reproductions. This, however, is not “systematic” access to their moment-to-moment remembering.

  12. 12.

    The role of interpretation was not even eliminated in Wundt’s strict experimental setup. For example, concerning the two-point threshold, Binet (1903) showed participant’s interpretation of “two-points” differed depending on their interpretation of the task. Some participants interpreted “two-points” from a broader heavier single point or a bell shaped point. In short, describing in more detail the qualitative character of the sensation changed the results of Wundt’s experiment (Danziger, 1990).

  13. 13.

    For another example of this ‘think-aloud’ research strategy see Diriwächter, this volume.

  14. 14.

    For a general outline of this contrast see Toomela (2007 and in this book).

  15. 15.

    Recently, Molenaar (2004a,b) has forcefully made the same argument.

  16. 16.

    These results have been recently reproduced with minor modifications (Meshcheryakov, 2008).

  17. 17.

    Bartlett’s third major concept is attitude which has already been mentioned in connection with the Würzburgers in Section 3.1.

  18. 18.

    Single case analysis allows one to explore functioning on particular tasks in light of more general functioning. A participant’s history can be used in the analysis.

  19. 19.

    For a recent empirical example of the proposed methodological synthesis (see Wagoner, in press).

References

  • Bakhurst, D. (1990). Social memory in soviet thought. In D. Middleton & D. Edwards (Eds.), Collective remembering (pp. 203–226). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1916). Transformations arising from repeated representation: A contribution towards an experimental study of the process of conventionalisation, Fellowship Dissertation, St. John’s College, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1951). Review of thinking: An introduction to its experimental psychology by George Humphrey (1951). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4(1), 87–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binet, A. (1903). L'etude expérimentale de l'intelligence. Paris: Schleicher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E. G. (1950). A history of experimental psychology. New York. Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catán, L. (1986). The dynamic display of process: Historical development and contemporary uses of the microgenetic method. Human Development, 29, 252–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catán, L. (1989). Musical literacy and the development of rhythm representation: Cognitive change and material media. In A. Gellaty, D. Rogers, & J. Sloboda (Eds.), Cognition and social worlds (pp. 144–167). Oxford, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1987). Statistical method and the historical development of research practice in American psychology. In G. Gigerenzer, M. Morgan, L. Kruger (Eds.), The probabilistic revolution: Ideas in modern science, Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K., & Ballantyne, P. F. (1997). Psychological experiments. In W. Bringmann, et al. (Eds.), Pictorial history of psychology (pp. 233–239). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diriwächter, R. (2009). Idiographic microgenesis: Re-visiting the experimental tradition of Aktualgenese. In J. Valsiner, P. C. M. Molenaar, M. C. D. P. Lyra, & N. Chaudhary (Eds.), Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 319–352 ). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diriwächter, R., & Valsiner, J. (2005, December). Qualitative developmental research methods in their historical and epistemological contexts [53 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 7(1), Art 8. Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/1-06/06-1-8-e.htm. Accessed 25 Feb, 2008.

  • Duveen, G. (2000). Piaget as ethnographer. Social S cience Information, 39, 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, H. (1885/1913). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. & Middleton, D. (1987). Conversation and remembering: Bartlett revisited. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2007). Putting Vygotsky to work: The change laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauld, A., & Stephenson, G. M. (1967). Some experiments related to Bartlett’s theory of remembering. British Journal of Psychology, 58, 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, E. N. (1903). A study of remembering and connected trains of thought. Psychological Review Monograph Supplements, 5 (Whole No. 23), 1–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G. (1988). Thematic origins of scientific thought: Kepler to Einstein . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphery, G. (1951). Thinking: An introduction to its experimental psychology . London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusch, M. (1999). Psychological knowledge: A social history and philosophy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, S., & Berntsen, D. (2000). Bartlett’s trilogy of memory: Reconstructing the concept of attitude. In A. Saito (Ed.), Bartlett, culture and cognition (pp. 115–134). UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1933). Environmental forces in child behavior and development. In C. Murchinson (Ed.), A handbook of child psychology (pp. 590–625). Worcester: Clark University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1970). Traumatic aphasia: Its syndromes, psychology and treatment. Paris: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1987). The mind of a mnemonist: A little book about a vast memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meshcheryakov, B. (2008). The parallelogram of memory development: Not a myth, but requires specification. Paper presented at the International Society for Culture and Activity Research, San Diego, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, P. (2004a). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology,this time forever. Measurement, 2(4), 201–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, P. (2004b). Forum discussion of the manifesto’s aggregation act. Measurement, 2(4), 248–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, P., & Valsiner, J. (2005). How generalization works through the single case: A simple idiographic process analysis of an individual psychotherapy. International Journal of Idiographic Science, 1(1) [92 paragraphs]. (Reprinted in S. Salvatore et al. (2009). Yearbook of idiographic science 2008 (Vol. 1). Rome: G Fireira Group)

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippe, J. (1897). Sur les transformations de nos images mentales. Revue de Philosoque, 43, 481–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., Bergman, E. T., & Meade, M. L. (2000). Repeated reproduction from memory. In A. Saito (Ed.), Bartlett, culture and cognition (pp. 115–134). London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, V. (2004). Microgenesis, immediate experience and visual processes in reading. In A. Carsetti (Ed.), Seeing, thinking and knowing: Meaning and self-organization in visual cognition and thought. Rome: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titchener, E. B. (1909). Lectures on the experimental psychology of the thought-processes. New York: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Toomela, A. (2007). Culture of science: Strange history of the methodological thinking in psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 41, 6–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (1998). The guided mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2000). Culture and human development. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2003). Culture and its transfer: Ways of creating general knowledge through the study of cultural particulars. In W. J. Lonner, D. L. Dinnel, S. A. Hayes, & D. N. Sattler (Eds.), Online readings in psychology and culture http:/www.wwu.edu/~culture. Accessed 15 June, 2006.

  • Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies: Foundations of cultural psychology. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J., & van der Veer, R. (2000). The social mind: Construction of the idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veresov, N. (2008). CHAT in retrospective: Bridging the gap or fixing the hole? Paper presented at the International Society for Culture and Activity Research, San Diego, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1987). The c ollected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Vol. 4: The history of the development of higher mental functions. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L., & Luria, A. (1994). Tool and symbol in child development. In J. Valsiner & R. van der Veer (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 99–172). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagoner, B. (2007). Overcoming psychology’s methodology: Finding synthesis beyond the American and German-Austrian division. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 41(1), 6–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagoner, B. (2008a). Developing “development” in theory and method: Commentary on Kleine-Horst. In E. Abbey & R. Diriwätcher (Eds.), Innovating genesis (pp. 39–61). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagoner, B. (2008b). The microgenetic method: A history of transformations. BPS: History and philosophy of psychology section conference. March 25–27, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagoner, B. (in press). Narrative in the recall of apparent behavior. In S. Salvatore & T. Zittoun (Eds.), Cultural psychology and psychoanalysis in dialogue. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H. (1956). Microgenesis and aphasia. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 52, 347–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H. (1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic view. In D. B. Harris (Ed.), The concept of development. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H., & Kaplan, B. (1957). Symbolic mediation and organization of thought: An experimental approach by means of the line schematization technique. The Journal of Psychology, 43, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H., & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation. Hillsdale: Lawerance Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H., & Kaplan, E. (1954). Change of meaning: A study of semantic processes through the experimental method. Journal of General Psychology, 50, 181–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, F. (1966). The art of memory. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I want to thank the Gates Cambridge Trust for generously funding me through my PhD at the University of Cambridge. I would also like to recognize Nicole Kronberger, Hala Mahmoud, Jaan Valsiner, and Tania Zittoun for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brady Wagoner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wagoner, B. (2009). The Experimental Methodology of Constructive Microgenesis. In: Valsiner, J., Molenaar, P., Lyra, M., Chaudhary, N. (eds) Dynamic Process Methodology in the Social and Developmental Sciences. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-95922-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics