Abstract
Anybody who has some familiarity with the research literature in scientific psychology has probably thought, at one time or another, ‘Well, all these means and correlations are very interesting, but what do they have to do with me, as an individual person?’. The question, innocuous as it may seem, is a deep and complicated one. In contrast to the natural sciences, where researchers can safely assume that, say, all electrons are exchangeable save properties such as location and momentum, people differ from each other. Furthermore, it is not obvious that these differences can be treated as irrelevant to the structure of the organisms in question, i.e., it is not clear that they can be treated as ‘noise’ or ‘error’. The problem permeates virtually every subdiscipline of psychology, and in fact may be one of the reasons that progress in psychology has been limited. As Lykken (1991, pp. 3–4) hypothesizes:
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amidzic, O., Riehle, H. J., Fehr, T., Wienbruch, C., & Elbert, T. (2001). Pattern of focal γ-bursts in chess players. Nature 412, 603.
Anderson, M. (1992). Intelligence and development. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). The HEXACO model of personality structure and the importance of the H factor. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1952–1962.
Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244.
Boomsma, D. I., Busjahn, A., & Peltonen, L. (2002). Classical twin studies and beyond. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3, 872–882.
Borsboom, D. (2005). Measuring the mind: Conceptual issues in contemporary psychometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Borsboom, D. (2008). Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64, 1089–1108.
Borsboom, D., & Dolan, C. V. (2006). Why g is not an adaptation: A comment on Kanazawa. Psychological Review, 113, 433–437.
Borsboom, D., & Dolan, C. V. (2007). Theoretical equivalence, measurement, invariance, and the idiographic filter. Measurement, 5, 236–263.
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110, 203–219.
Cervone, D. (1991). The two disciplines of personality psychology. Psychological Science, 2, 371–377.
Cervone, D. (2004). The architecture of personality. Psychological Review , 111, 183–204.
Cervone, D. (2005). Personality architecture: Within-person structures and processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 423–452.
Cervone, D., Caldwell, T. L., Fiori, M., Orom, H., Shadel, W. G., & Kassel, J., et al. (2008). What underlies appraisals?: Experimentally testing a knowledge-and-appraisal model of personality architecture among smokers contemplating high-risk situations. Journal of Personality, 76, 929–967.
Cervone, D., & Mischel, W. (Eds.). (2002). Advances in personality science. New York: Guilford Press.
Churchland, P. (1981). Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy, 78, 67–90.
Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 612–684.
Danziger, K. (2000). Making social psychology experimental: A conceptual history, 1920–1970. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 36, 329–347.
Deary, I. J. (2000). Looking down on human intelligence: From psychometrics to the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Groot, A. D. (1978). Thought and choice in chess. Den Haag, Mouton.
Ellis, J. L., & Wollenberg, A. L. v. d. (1993). Local homogeneity in latent trait models: A characterization of the homogeneous monotone IRT model. Psychometrika, 58, 417–429.
Eysenck, H. J. (1970). The structure of personality. (3rd ed.). London: Methuen.
Fodor, J. (1974). The special sciences, or: The disunity of psychology as a working hypothesis. Synthese, 28, 97–115.
Fodor, J. (1997). Special sciences: Still autonomous after all these years. Nous, 31, 149–163.
Freud, S. (1900/1953). The interpretation of dreams. Standard Edition (Vol. 4, pp. 1–338; Vol. 5, pp.339–621). London: Hogarth Press.
Freud, S. (1923/1961). The ego and the id . Standard Edition (Vol. 18, pp. 12–66). London: Hogarth Press.
Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind. New York: Basic books.
Garlick, D. (2002). Understanding the nature of the general factor of intelligence: The role of inter-individual differences in neural plasticity as an explanatory mechanism. Psychological Review, 109, 116–136.
Greenberg, J., Koole, S. L., & Pyszczynski, T. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of experimental existential psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
Gödel, K. (1931). Über formal unentscheidbare Satze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I. In Feferman, S. (1986). Kurt Gödel: Collected Works, (Vol. 1, pp. 144–195). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34.
Hamaker, E. L., Dolan, C. V., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2005). Statistical modeling of the individual: Rationale and application of multivariate time series analysis. Multivariate Behavior Research, 40, 207–233.
Hamaker, E. L., Nesselroade, J. R., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2007). The integrated trait-state model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 295–315.
Harré, R. (1998). The singular self: An introduction to the psychology of personhood. London: Sage.
Hermans, H. J. M. (2001). The construction of a personal position repertoire: Method and practice. Culture and Psychology, 7, 323–365.
Jaenisch, R., & Bird, A. (2003). Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: How the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nature Genetics, 35, 245–254.
Jansen, B. R. J., & Van der Maas, H. L. J. (2002). The development of children’s rule use on the balance scale task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81, 383–416.
Jensen, A. (1998). The g factor. Westport: Praeger.
Jensen, A. (2002). Psychometric g: Definition and substantiation. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? (pp. 39–54). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big-five factor taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.
Kanazawa, S. (2004). General intelligence as a domain-specific adaptation. Psychological Review, 111, 512–523.
Krueger, R. F. (1999). The structure of common mental disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 921–926.
Kuhl, J., & Koole, S. L. (2004). Workings of the will: A functional approach. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 411–430). New York: Guilford.
Lamiell, J. T. (1987). The psychology of personality: An epistemological inquiry. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lykken, D. T. (1991). What’s wrong with psychology anyway? In D. Cicchetti & W. M. Grove (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology. Vol. 1: Matters of public interest (pp. 3–39). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51–87). New York: Guilford.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2008). Empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. In G. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. Saklofske (Eds.), Sage handbook of personality theory and assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 273–294). Los Angeles: Sage.
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.
Miele, F. (2002). Intelligence, race, and genetics: Conversations with Arthur Jensen. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–286.
Molenaar, P. C. M. (1999). Longitudinal analysis. In H. J. Ader & G. J. Mellenbergh (Eds.), Research methodology in the social, behavioural, and life sciences (pp. 143–167). London: Sage.
Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as ideographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2, 201–218.
Molenaar, P. C. M., Boomsma D. I., & Dolan, C. V. (1993). A third source of developmental differences. Behavior Genetics, 23, 519–524.
Molenaar, P. C. M., Huizenga, H. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2003). The relationship between the structure of interindividual and intraindividual variability: A theoretical and empirical vindication of developmental systems theory. In U. M. Staudinger & U. Lindenberger (Eds.), Understanding human development: Dialogues with lifespan psychology (pp. 339–360). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Muthén, B. O. (1989). Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrika, 54, 557–585.
Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Posthuma, D., de Geus, E. J. C., Baaré, W. F. C., Hulshoff Pol, H. E., Kahn, R. S., & Boomsma, D. I. (2002). The association between brain volume and intelligence is of genetic origin. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 83–84.
Simpson, E. H. (1951). The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 13, 238–241.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). Unified psychology. American Psychologist, 56, 1069–1079.
Timmerman, M. E., Ceulemans, E., Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., & Vansteeland, K. (2009). Multilevel simultaneous component analysis for studying intra-individual variability and inter-individual differences. In J. Valsiner & P. C. M. Molenaar (Eds.), Developmental process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 291–318). New York: Springer.
Van der Maas, H. L. J., Dolan, C. V., Grasman, R. P. P. P., Wicherts, J. M., Huizenga, H. M., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2006). A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychological Review, 113, 842–861.
Van Geert, P. (1991). A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth. Psychological Review, 98, 3–53.
Van Rijn, P. (2008). Categorical time series in psychological measurement. University of Amsterdam, Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
Verguts, T., & De Boeck, P. (2002). The induction of solution rules in Raven’s Progressive Matrices test. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 521–547.
Whitehead, A. N., & Russell, B. (1910). Principia mathematica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Acknowledgments
Denny Borsboom’s work was supported by NWO innovational research grant no. 452-07-005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Borsboom, D., Kievit, R., Cervone, D., Hood, S. (2009). The Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology, or: The Disunity of Psychology as a Working Hypothesis. In: Valsiner, J., Molenaar, P., Lyra, M., Chaudhary, N. (eds) Dynamic Process Methodology in the Social and Developmental Sciences. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-95922-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-95922-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-95921-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-95922-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)