Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On Building Meaning: A Biologically-Inspired Experiment on Symbol-Based Communication

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Brain Inspired Cognitive Systems 2008

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 657))

Abstract

The use of an appropriate set of empirical and theoretical constraints to guide the construction of synthetic experiments leads to a better understanding of the natural phenomena under study, and allows for a greater understanding of the experimental results. We begin this chapter with a description of a general approach for conducting experiments with artificial creatures within a synthetic ethological context. Next, we describe how this approach was used to build a computational experiment regarding the emergence of self-organized symbols. Our experiment simulated a community of artificial creatures undergoing complex intra and inter-specific interactions in which meaning evolved over time, from a tabula rasa repertoire of random alarm-calls to a specific set of optimal referential alarm-calls. To design different kinds of creatures as well as innanimate elements of the environment, we applied theoretical constraints from the Peircean philosophy of sign and empirical constraints from neuroethology. Our results suggest that the constraints chosen were both necessary and sufficient to produce symbolic communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The idea of communication/language as a self-organizing process have been presented also by other authors, e.g. (Steels 2003, Keller 1994).

References

  • Andersen RA, Buneo CA (2002) Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 25:189–220.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braitenberg V (1984) Vehicles: Experiments in Synthetic Psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachussets.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert GA (2001) Crossmodal processing in the human brain: insights from functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex 11(12):1110–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cangelosi A, Greco A, Harnad S (2002) Symbol grounding and the symbolic theft hypothesis. In: Cangelosi A, Parisi D (ed) Simulating the Evolution of Language. Sprinter. London. chap. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1998) Why monkeys don’t have language. In: Petersen G (ed) The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol. 19.University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City. pp.173–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colapietro V (1989) Peirce’s Approach to the Self: A Semiotic Perspective on Human Subjectivity. State University of New York Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon TW (1997) The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and brain. W.W. Norton Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer JH (1990) Artificial Intelligence: Its Scope and Limits. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freadman A (2004) The Machinery of Talk — Charles Peirce and the Sign Hypothesis. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman E (1983) The Relevance of Charles Peirce. Monist Library of Philosophy, La Salle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb DO (1949) The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer J (1996) Signs of Meaning in the Universe. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hookway C (1985) Peirce. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung D, Zelinsky A (2000) Grounded symbolic communication between heterogeneous cooperating robots. Autonomous Robots journal 8(3):269–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DM, Shore DI, Spence C, Calvert GA (2003) Multisensory representation of limb position in human premotor cortex. Nature Neuroscience 6(1):17–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keller R (1994) On language change: The invisible hand in language. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loula A, Gudwin R, El-Hani CN, Queiroz J (in press) Emergence of Self-Organized Symbol-Based Communication in Artificial Creatures. Cognitive Systems Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loula A, Gudwin R, Queiroz J (2004) Symbolic Communication in Artificial Creatures: an experiment in Artificial Life. In: Bazzan A, Labidi S (ed) 17th Brazilian Symposium on Artificial Intelligence – SBIA (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3171:336–345). see also, www2.uefs.br/graco/symbcreatures/

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLennan BJ (2002) Synthetic ethology: a new tool for investigating animal cognition. In: Bekoff M, Allen C, Burghardt GM (ed) The Cognitive Animal: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Animal Cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. chap. 20, pp. 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mataric M (1998) Behavior-Based Robotics as a Tool for Synthesis of Artificial Behavior and Analysis of Natural Behavior. Trends in Cognitive Science 2(3):82–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGaugh JL (2004) The amygdala modulates the consolidation of memories of emotionally arousing experiences. Annual Review of Neuroscience 27:1–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morgavi G, Morando M, Biorci G, Caviglia D (2005) Growing up: emerging complexity in living being. Cybernetics and Systems 36(4):379–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble J (1998) The Evolution of Animal Communication Systems: Questions of Function Examined through Simulation. D. Phil. thesis, University of Sussex, November, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce CS (1967) Annotated catalogue the papers of Charles S. Peirce. Robin RS (ed). University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst. §11, 318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce CS (1958) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poeppel D (1997) Mind over chatter. Nature 388:734.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Queiroz J (2003) Comunicação simbólica em primatas não-humanos: uma análise baseada na semiótica de C.S.Peirce. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 25 (Supl II): 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queiroz J, El-Hani CN (2006) Semiosis as an Emergent Process. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 42(1):78–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queiroz J, Merrell F (2009) On Peirce’s pragmatic notion of semiosis – a contribution for the design of meaning machines. Minds & Machines 19: 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queiroz J, Ribeiro S (2002) The biological substrate of icons, indexes and symbols in animal communication. In: Shapiro M (ed) The Peirce Seminar Papers 5.Berghahn Books, Oxford, UK. pp. 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransdell J (1977) Some leading ideas of Peirce’s semiotic. Semiotica 19(3):157–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro S, Loula A, Araújo I, Gudwin R, Queiroz J (2007) Symbols are not uniquely human. Biosystems 90:263–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues SM, Schafe GE, Ledoux JE (2004) Molecular mechanisms underlying emotional learning and memory in the lateral amygdale. Neuron 44(1):75–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rolls ET (2000) Memory systems in the brain. Annual Review of Physiology 51:599–630.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy D (2005a) Semiotic Schemas: A Framework for Grounding Language in Action and Perception. Artificial Intelligence 167(1–2):170–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (1986) Vocal development in vervet monkeys. Animal Behaviour 34:1640–1658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL, Marler P (1980) Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: Evidence for predator classification and semantic communication. Science 210:801–803.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steels L (2003) Evolving grounded communication for robots. Trends in Cognitive Science 7(7):308–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struhsaker TT (1967) Behavior of vervet monkeys and other cercopithecines. New data show structural uniformities in the gestures of semiarboreal and terrestrial cercopithecines. Science 156(779):1197–203.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun R (2000) Symbol grounding: A new look at an old idea. Philosofical Psychology 13(2): 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki WA (1999) The long and the short of it: memory signals in the medial temporal lobe. Neuron 24(2):295–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tiercelin C (1995) The relevance of Peirce’s semiotic for contemporary issues in cognitive science. In: Haaparanta L, Heinämaa S (ed), Mind and Cognition: Philosophical Perspectives on Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence. Acta Philosophica Fennica 58. pp. 37–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt P (2002) The physical symbol grounding problem. Cognitive Systems Research 3(3): 429–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner K, Reggia JA, Uriagereka J, Wilkinson GS (2003) Progress in the simulation of emergent communication and language. Adaptive Behavior 11(1):37–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss P, Burks A (1945) Peirce’s sixty-six signs. Journal of Philosophy XLII: 383–388.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by FAPESB, CNPq and AASDAP.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Exact Sciences, State University of Feira de Santana, Brazil, Feira de Santana

    Angelo Loula

  2. Department of Computer Engineering and Industrial Automation, FEEC, State University of Campinas, Brazil, Campinas

    Angelo Loula & Ricardo Gudwin

  3. Edmond and Lily Safra International Institute of Neuroscience of Natal (ELS-IINN), Brazil, Natal

    Sidarta Ribeiro

  4. Department of Neuroscience, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil, Natal

    Sidarta Ribeiro

  5. Research Group on Cognitive Science and Semiotics, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, UFJF, Brazil, Juiz de Fora

    João Queiroz

Authors
  1. Angelo Loula
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ricardo Gudwin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sidarta Ribeiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. João Queiroz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Queiroz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. Computing Science, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, United Kingdom

    Amir Hussain

  2. Technology & Medicine, Imperial College of Science,, Exhibition Rd., London, SW7 2BT, United Kingdom

    Igor Aleksander

  3. Dept. Computing Science, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, United Kingdom

    Leslie S. Smith

  4. Centro Tecnológico, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Av. dos Portugueses s/n, São Luís, 65080-040, Brazil

    Allan Kardec Barros

  5. Dept. Informatics, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QJ, United Kingdom

    Ron Chrisley

  6. Dept. Computing Science and Mathematics, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, United Kingdom

    Vassilis Cutsuridis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Loula, A., Gudwin, R., Ribeiro, S., Queiroz, J. (2010). On Building Meaning: A Biologically-Inspired Experiment on Symbol-Based Communication. In: Hussain, A., Aleksander, I., Smith, L., Barros, A., Chrisley, R., Cutsuridis, V. (eds) Brain Inspired Cognitive Systems 2008. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 657. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79100-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation