Skip to main content

Mediating Academic Language Learning Through Classroom Discourse

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 15))

Abstract

For school-aged students who are learning ESL, the discourse of the classroom must simultaneously construct curriculum knowledge and be a site for second language development. This chapter focuses on academic language learning in the ESL school context, in particular on how language learning is mediated through classroom discourse. While linguistic, social, and sociocognitive traditions have interpreted the nature of interaction differently, it is seen in all of them as playing a major part in learning and language development. The chapter draws on research in sociocultural approaches to pedagogy, systemic functional linguistics (SFL), and second language acquisition (SLA) studies in examining the relationship between classroom discourse and the development of ESL students’ academic language learning. It argues that interactions should be examined both for their effectiveness in fostering language development and also for the impact these interactions have on how students view themselves. The chapter concludes with some implications for classroom practice, which suggest how teachers can orchestrate classroom discourse for academic language learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baker, K. (1992, Winter, Spring). Review of forked tongue. Bilingual Basics, 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D. (1976). From communication to curriculum. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellack, A., Kliebard, H., Hyman, R., & Smith, F. (1966). The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers’ College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D. (1986). Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language 62, 384–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, B., Christensen, L., Karp, S., Miner, B., & Peterson, B. (1994). Rethinking our classrooms: Teaching for justice and equity. Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, M. (2001). Navigating the discourse: On what is learned in the classroom. In C. Candlin & N. Mercer (Eds.), English language teaching in its social context, (pp. 306–322). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, J. (1970). Language and learning. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, F. (1992). Communicative competence and the conversation course: A social interaction perspective. Linguistics and Education, 4, 219–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1975). Language as an instrument of thought. In A. Davies (Ed.), Problems of language and learning, (pp. 61–68). London: Heimemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canale, M. (1983). On some dimensions of language proficiency. In J. Oiler (Ed.), Issues in language testing research, (pp. 333–342). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, F. (1994). On pedagogic discourse. Melbourne: Australian Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, V. (1989). How quickly can immigrants become proficient in school English? Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 5, 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (1986). Empowering minority students: A framework for intervention. Harvard Education Review, 15, 18–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (1996). Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society. Los Angeles: California Association for Bilingual Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy. Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darder, A. (1991). Culture and power in the classroom: A critical foundation for bicultural education. New York: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 280–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derewianka, B. (1990). Exploring how texts work. Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, J. (1983). Teaching and the art of questioning. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Cappa Educational Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, J. (1985). Using questions to foil discussion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1, 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, M. (1978). Children’s minds. Glasgow: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research, (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, (pp. 27–50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engstrom, Y., & Middleton, D. (Eds.). (1996). Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floriani, A. (1993). Negotiating what counts: Roles and relationships, texts and contexts, content and meaning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 241–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science: Hearing children’s questions and theories, responding with curricula. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, P. (2001). Learning a new register in a second language. In C. Candlin & N. Mercer (Eds.), English language teaching in its social context (pp. 258–270), London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly 37(2), 247–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K., & Goodman, Y. (1994). Vygotsky in a whole language perspective. In L. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 223–250). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J., & Dixon, C. (1994). Talking knowledge into being: Discursive and social practices in classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 5(3–4), 231–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, K. (1994). How talk, context and script shape contexts for learning: A cross-case comparison of journal sharing. Linguistics and Education 5, 335–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, K., Larson, J., & Kreuter, B. (1995). Cultural tensions in the scripted classroom: The value of the subjugated perspective. Urban Education, 29(4), 410–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, K., Rymes B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in classrooms: James Brown vs. Brown vs. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 445–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, K. & Stone, L. (2000). Synchronic and diachronic dimensions of social practice: An emerging methodology for cultural-historical perspectives on literacy learning. In C. Lee. & P. Smagorinsky, Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research. Constructing meaning through collaborative enquiry (pp. 150–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. (1995). (Re)creating our worlds with words: A sociohistorical perspective of face-to-face interaction. Applied Linguistics, 16, 206–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. (1998). Differential teacher attention to student utterances: The construction of different opportunities for learning in the IRF. Linguistics and Education 9(3), 287–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J. (1990). Is learning to read and write the same as learning to speak? In F. Christie (Ed.), Literacy for a Changing World (pp. 26–53). Victoria: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasermann, M. (1991). Obstruction and dominance: Uncooperative moves and their effect on the course of conversation. In I. Markova & K. Foppa (Eds.), Asymmetries in dialogue (pp. 101–123). Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., & Smagorinsky, P. (2000). Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research. Constructing meaning through collaborative enquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O., & Fradd, S. (1996). Interactional patterns of linguistically diverse students and teachers: Insights for promoting science learning. Linguistics and Education, 8, 269–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (1988). Genres, semantics and classroom education. Linguistics and Education, 1(1) 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L. (1994). Language of and in the classroom: Constructing patterns of social life. Linguistics and Education, 5, 367–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (1984). Language, register and genre. In F. Christie (Ed.), Children writing, study guide, 21–29. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (1990). Literacy in science: Learning to handle text as technology. In F. Christie (Ed.), Literacy for a changing world (pp. 79–117). Hawthorn, Victoria: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., Christie, F., & Rothery, J. (1987). Social processes in education: A reply to Sawyer and Watson (and others). In I. Reid (Ed.), The Place of genre in learning: Current debates (pp. 58–82). Geelong, Victoria: Centre for Studies in Literary Education, Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. & Veel, R. (1998). Reading science. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maybin, J., Mercer, N., & Stierer, B. (1992). Scaffolding learning in the classroom. In K. Norman (Ed.), Thinking voices: The work of the National Oracy Project (pp. 186–195). London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R. (1993). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 269–305). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, P., Davies, A., Devlin, B., Clayton, J., Oliver, R., & Zammit, S. (1997). The bilingual interface project report. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P. (1994). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, B. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (1994). Neo-Vygotskian theory and classroom education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, S. (1981). ’sharing time’: Children’s narrative styles and differential access to literacy. Language in Society, 10, 423–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, B. (1986). Language and content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, B. (2002). The second language as a medium of learning. In B. Mohan, C. Leung & C. Davison (Eds.), English as a second language in the mainstream (pp. 107–126). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, L. (1994). Vygotsky and education. Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieto, S. (1996). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (2nd Ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieto, S. (1999). The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How high schools structure inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, A. (1995). Applying sociocultural theory to an analysis of learner discourse: Learner-learner collaborative interaction in the zone of proximal development. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 93–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, A. (1997). The development of pragmatic competence in learner-learner classroom interaction. In L. Bouton (Ed.), Pragmatics and language learning, Monograph Series, Vol. 8 (pp. 223–242). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, A. (1999). Interactional routines and the socialisation of interactional style in adult learners of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1493–1512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, A. (2000). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R. (1977) From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, T. (1985). Beyond lip-service: Discourse development after the age of nine. In G. Wells & J. Nicholls (Eds.), Language and learning: An interactional perspective (pp. 59–82). East Sussex: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pica, T., Lincoln-Porter, F., Pattinois, D., & Linell, J. (1996). Language learners’ interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs of language learners? TESOL Quarterly, 30, 59–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putney, L., Green, J., Dixon, C., Duran R., & Yeager, B. (2000). Consequential progressions: Exploring collective-individual development in a bilingual classroom. In C. Lee & P. Smagorinsky, Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research. Constructing meaning through collaborative enquiry (pp. 86–126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M. (1986). Wait time: Slowing down may be a way of speeding up. Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, R. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smagorinsky, P. (1993). The social environment of the classroom: A Vygotskian perspective on small group process. Communication Education, 42(2) 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smagorinsky, P., & O’Donnell-Allen, C. (2000). Idiocultural diversity in small groups: The role of the relational framework in collaborative learning. In C. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research. Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 1–18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlehofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In Lantolf, J. (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1990). Aspects of the sociolinguistic performance of early and late French immersion students. In R. Scarcella, E. Andersen, & S. Krashen (Eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language (pp. 41–54). New Work: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tharp, R., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toohey, K. (2000). Learning English at school: Identity, social relations and classroom practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torr, J. (1993). Classroom discourse: Children from English speaking and non-English speaking backgrounds. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tough, J. (1977). Talking and learning: Schools council communication skills in early childhood project. London: Ward Lock Educational in association with Drake Educational Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, L. (Ed.). (2000). Researching language in schools and communities: Functional linguistics perspectives. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245–260). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works, Volume 1, including Thinking and speaking. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, C. (1991). Issues of language, power and schooling for Puerto Ricans. Toronto: OISE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, C. (Ed.). (1996). Education reform and social change: Multicultural voices, struggles and visions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, A., Beveridge, M., & Reed, M. (1996). Managing the literacy curriculum. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegerif, R. & Mercer, N. (1996). Computers and reasoning through talk in the classroom. Language and Education, 10(1), 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1986). The meaning makers: Children learning language and using language to learn. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1992). The centrality of talk in education. In K. Norman (Ed.), Thinking voice: The work of the National Oracy Project. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1996). Using the tool-kit of discourse in the activity of learning and teaching. Mind, Culture and Language, 3(2), 74–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry. Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education: Building on the legacy of Vygotsky. In C. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research. Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 51–85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G., & Chang-Wells, G. (1992). Constructing knowledge together: Classrooms as centers of inquiry and literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, A. M. (1965). Spoken English. Birmingham: University of Birmingham School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gibbons, P. (2007). Mediating Academic Language Learning Through Classroom Discourse. In: Cummins, J., Davison, C. (eds) International Handbook of English Language Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 15. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_46

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics