Skip to main content

Abstract

While crops improved using biotechnology (recombinant DNA methods) have been widely adopted in soybeans, cotton, maize, and canola, only a few varieties of horticultural or specialty crops have been commercialized. Numerous traits developed through biotechnology would be valuable for specialty crops. However, commericalization of these traits is limited by the diversity of species involved, multiple niche markets, small production windows per cultivar, requirements of processors, distributors and retailers, and access to intellectual property required for developing transgenic varieties. Regulatory requirements for biotech crops, particularly the separate regulation of each transgenic event, are also uniquely burdensome for specialty crops. Targeted assistance with the regulatory process, analogous to the IR-4 program for the registration of agricultural chemicals for minor crops, is recommended as a way to encourage the commercialization of biotech specialty crops. Continuing development of biotech specialty crops in China, India, and other countries may eventually open international markets to these products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alston, J.M. 2004. “Horticultural Biotechnology Faces Significant Economic and Market Barriers.” California Agriculture 58(2): 80–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, J.M, K.J. Bradford, and N. Kalaitzanctonakes. 2006. “The Economics of Horticultural Biotechnology.” Journal of Crop Improvement 16 (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R.C., R.N. Beachy, G. Conway, F.A. Cordova, M.A. Fox, K.A. Holbrook, D.F. Klessig, R.L. McCormick, P.M. McPherson, H.R. Rawlings III, R. Rapson, L.N. Vander-hoef, J.D. Wiley, and C.E. Young. 2003. “Public Sector Collaboration for Agricultural IP Management.” Science 301(5630): 174–175.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, K.J., and J.M. Alston. 2004a. “Diversity of Horticultural Biotech Crops Contributes to Market Hurdles.” California Agriculture 58(2): 84–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2004b. “Horticultural Biotechnology: Challenges for Commercial Development.” Chronica Horliculturae 44(4): 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, K.J., A. Van Deynze, N. Gutterson, W. Parrott, and S.H. Strauss. 2005. “Regulating Transgenic Crops Sensibly: Lessons from Plant Breeding, Biotechnology and Genomics.” Nature Biotechnology 23(4): 439–444.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D., H. Klee, and A. Dandekar. 2004. “Despite Benefits, Commercialization of Transgenic Horticultural Crops Lags.” California Agriculture 58(2): 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.I. 2005. “Poorer Nations Turn to Publicly Developed GM Crops.” Nature Biotechnology 23(1): 27–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R.L. 2004. “Transgenic Produce Slow to Enter Evolving Global Marketplace.” California Agriculture 58(2): 82–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmer, D.P., C. Nottenburg, G.D. Graff, and A.B. Bennett. 2003. “Intellectual Property Resources for International Development in Agriculture.” Plant Physiology 133(4): 1666–1670.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, J., J. Castillón, and A. Dandekar. 2004. “Transgenic Trap Crops and Rootstocks Show Potential.” California Agriculture 58(2): 96–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianessi, L. 2004. “Biotechnology Expands Pest-Management Options for Horticulture.” California Agriculture 58(2): 94–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianessi, L., S. Sankula, and N. Reigner. 2003. Plant Biotechnology: Potential Impact for improving Pest Management in European Agriculture. A Summary of Nine Case Studies. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy. Available online at www.ncfap.org (accessed May 18, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianessi L.P., C.S. Silvers, S. Sankula S, and J.E. Carpenter. 2002. Plant Biotechnology: Current and Potential Impact for Improving Pest Management in U.S. Agriculture—An Analysis of 40 Case Studies. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy. Available online at www.ncfap.org (accessed May 18, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldner, W., A.M. Thro, and J.W. Radin (eds.). 2005. “Public Research and the Regulatory Review of Small-market (Specialty) Biotechnology-Derived Crops Workshop.” Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Riverdale, Maryland. Available online at www.csrees.usda.gov/nea/biotech/pdf/small_mkt.pdf (accessed May 18, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonsalves, D. 2004. “Virus-Resistant Transgenic Papaya Helps Save Hawaiian Industry.” California Agriculture 58(2): 92–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, G., B. Wright, A. Bennett, and D. Zilberman. 2004. “Access to Intellectual Property Is a Major Obstacle to Developing Transgenic Horticultural Crops.” California Agriculture 58(2): 120–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoa, T.T.C., S. Al-Babili, I. Potrykus, and P. Beyer. 2003. “Golden Indica and Japonica Rice Lines Amenable to Deregulation.” Plant Physiology 133(1): 161–169.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holm, R.E., and D. Kunkel. 2004. “IR-4 Project Targets Specialty Crops.” California Agriculture 58(2): 110–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., and S. Rozelle. 2004, “China Aggressively Pursuing Horticulture and Plant Biotechnology.” California Agriculture 58(2): 112–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Information Systems for Biotechnology. 2004. “Field Test Releases in the U.S.” Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA. Available online at www.isb.vt.edu/cfdocs/fieldtests1.cfm (accessed May 18, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • James, C. 2004. “Preview: Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2004.” ISAAA Briefs No. 32, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. Available online at www.isaaa.org (accessed May 18, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerardo, A. 2004. Economist, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzandonakes, N. (ed.). 2003. Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech: A Global Perspective. New York: Kluwer-Plenum Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsmann, J., C. van der Hoeven, and A. Dietz-Pfeilstter. 1996. “Variability of Organ-Specific Expression of Reporter Genes in Transgenic Plants.” In E.R. Schmidt and T. Hankeln, eds., Transgenic Organisms and Biosafety. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, H.I., and G. Conko. 2004. The Frankenfood Myth: How Protest and Politics Threaten the Biotech Revolution. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2004. “Statistical Information.” U.S. Department of Agriculture, NASS, Washington, D.C. Available online at www.usda.gov/nass/ (accessed May 18, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Biological Information Infrastructure. 2004, “U.S. Database of Completed Regulatory Agency Reviews.” United States Regulatory Agencies Unified Biotechnology Website, http://usbiotechreg.nbii.gov (accessed May 18, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. 2004. Safety of Genetically Engineered Foods: Approaches to Assessing Unintended Health Effects. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press. Available online at http://books.nap.edu/catalog/10977.html (accessed May 18, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology. 2004. Issues in the Regulation of Genetically Engineered Plants and Animals. Washington, D.C: The Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology. Available online at www.pcwagbiotech.org/research/regulation (accessed May 18, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • ____. 2005. Impacts of Biotech Regulation on Small Business and University Research: Possible Barriers and Potential Solutions. Washington, D.C: The Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology. Available online at http://pewagbiotech.org/events/0602/proceedings.pdf (accessed May 18, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Redenbaugh, K., and A. McHughen. 2004. “Regulatory Challenges Reduce Opportunities for Horticultural Biotechnology.” California Agriculture 58(2): 106–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runge, C.F., and B. Ryan. 2004. “The Global Diffusion of Plant Biotechnology: International Adoption and Research in 2004.” University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN. Available online at www.apec.urnn.edu/faculty/frunge/globalbiotech04.pdf (accessed May 18, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Syngenta. 2005. “Following Syngenta-initiated Investigation of Unintended Corn Release, EPA and USDA Conclude Existing Food Safety Clearance Applies, No Human Health or Environmental Concerns.” Syngenta International AG, Basel, Switzerland. Available online at www.syngenta.com/en/downloads/Final_Syngenta_March_21_Statemcnt_e.pdf (accessed May 18, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ursin, V.M. 2003. “Modification of Plant Lipids for Human Health: Development of Functional Land-Based Omega-3 Fatty Acids.” Journal of Nutrition 133(12): 4271–4274.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Harten, A.M. 1998. Mutation Breeding. Theory and Practical Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bradford, K.J., Alston, J.M., Kalaitzandonakes, N. (2006). Regulation of Biotechnology for Specialty Crops. In: Just, R.E., Alston, J.M., Zilberman, D. (eds) Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics and Policy. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 30. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36953-2_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics