Skip to main content

Estimation of Consumers’ Willingness-to-pay for Quality of Service in Post

  • Chapter
Progress toward Liberalization of the Postal and Delivery Sector

Part of the book series: Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy ((TREP,volume 49))

  • 533 Accesses

Abstract

While Postal liberalisation is underway in the EU, much of the postal market remains regulated. Regulation takes the form of both price and entry protection. Entry protection is believed to be necessary for incumbent universal service providers (USPs) who face significant burdens from un-sustainable cross subsidies1. With both price and entry set exogenously by the regulator, quality of service naturally becomes an issue. Regulators are thus properly concerned about quality of service. At the same time, facing increasing competition from various forms of communication, Posts are also looking at quality of service from a commercial perspective. In fact, at recent international conferences on postal economics and universal service, speakers2,3 have given quality of service a prominent position in discussions about the future of the postal service. Many posts are under pressure from falling volumes and enhanced potential for electronic substitution. Quality of service improvement is seen as one way of stemming this tide.

The authors are Divisional Directors with LE. The authors wish to thank colleagues at LE, the editors of this volume, and many thanks to An Post. Any opinions, errors, or omissions are purely our own.

While opinions on this differ, we give no opinion on the burden of the USO. However, we point out that the existence of entry protection indicates some policy agreement on significance of the burden.

This includes the dinner address by Donal Curtin, CEO An Post, at the recent 2004 Conference on Postal and Delivery Economics in Cork, Ireland.

For example, see the comments of Mr. Mazou, the Secretary General of the UPU at the 2004 23rd World Postal Congress, Bucharest. He stressed that quality of service went hand-in-hand with network efficiency, and that increasing quality of service was the most likely way universal postal service providers should be seeking to combat substitution towards electronic communications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Court, A.T. 1939. “Hedonic Price Indexes with Automotive Examples.” In The Dynamics of Automobile Demand. New York, NY: General Motors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremer, H., M. De Rycke, A. Grimaud. 1997. “Service Quality, Competition, and Regulatory Policies in the Postal Service.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 11(5): 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. 1967. “Hedonic Price Indexes Revisited: Some Notes on the State of the Art.” Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section, American Statistical Association. 324–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A., and J. Muellbaur. 1980. “An Almost Ideal Demand System.” The American Economic Review 70(3): 312–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2003. http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal market/post/doc/studies/200308-ups-report en.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, RS, Doane, MJ, and Woo, C. (1991). “Consumer rationality and the status quo.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(1): 141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazou. 2004. Plennary address, 23rd World Postal Congress in Bucharest. www.upu.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postwatch. 2004. “Royal Mail Quality of Service” http://www.postwatch.co.uk/pdf/Research/June Julv04QoS studvfor RM PW postcomm.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reay, I. 2002. “The Welfare Economics of Universal Service Standards and Service Quality.” In Postal and Delivery Services: Pricing, Productivity, Regulation and Strategy, edited by M.A. Crew and P.R. Kleindorfer. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinand, G. 2004. “A Production Model of Service Quality at An Post.” In Competitive Transformation of the Postal and Delivery Sector, edited by M.A. Crew and P.R. Kleindorfer, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, G. and J.R. Hauser. 1993. Design and Marketing of New Products. 2nd Edition, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Swinand, G., Jones, S. (2006). Estimation of Consumers’ Willingness-to-pay for Quality of Service in Post. In: Crew, M.A., Kleindorfer, P.R. (eds) Progress toward Liberalization of the Postal and Delivery Sector. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy, vol 49. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-29744-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics