Skip to main content

System Description: Waldmeister — Improvements in Performance and Ease of Use

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1632))

Abstract

Waldmeister is an automated theorem prover for unconditional equational logic. It is based on unfailing Knuth-Bendix completion [1]. During the rst stage of development the focus was on efficient rewriting by means of indexing and space saving techniques [2, 4]. In this paper we present two aspects of our recent work which aim at improving the system with respect to performance and ease of use. Section 2 describes a more powerful hypothesis handling. In Sect. 3 we investigate the control of the proof search and outline our current component of self-adaptation to the given proof problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. Bachmair, N. Dershowitz, and D.A. Plaisted. Completion without failure. In Resolution of Equations in Algebraic Structures, volume 2, pages 1–30. Academic Press, 1989.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Buch and Th. Hillenbrand. Waldmeister: development of a high performance completion-based theorem prover. SEKI-Report 96-01, Universität Kaiserslautern, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Denzinger and S. Schulz. Learning domain knowledge to improve theorem proving. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Automated Deduction, volume 1104of LNAI, pages 76–62. Springer Verlag, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Th. Hillenbrand, A. Buch, R. Vogt, and B. Löchner. Waldmeister: High performance equational deduction. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 18(2):265–270, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Jaeger. Anwendungen von Nachfolgermengen in Termersetzungssystemen. Projektarbeit, Universität Kaiserslautern, 1997. In German.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C.B. Suttner and G. Sutcliffe. The TPTP problem library (TPTP v2.2.0). Technical Report 99/02, Department of Computer Science, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K.A. Zhevlakov, A.M. Slin’ko, I. P. Shestakov, and A.I. Shirshov. Rings that are nearly associative. Academic Press, New York, 1982. Translated from the Russian by H.F. Smith.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hillenbrand, T., Jaeger, A., Löchner, B. (1999). System Description: Waldmeister — Improvements in Performance and Ease of Use. In: Automated Deduction — CADE-16. CADE 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1632. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48660-7_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48660-7_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66222-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48660-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics