Skip to main content

Frameworks for Reasoning about Agent Based System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Infrastructure for Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Scalable Multi-Agent Systems (AGENTS 2000)

Abstract

This paper suggests formal frameworks that can be used as the basis for defining, reasoning about, and verifying properties of agent systems. The language, Little-JIL is graphical, yet has precise mathematically defined semantics. It incorporates a wide range of semantics needed to define the subtleties of agent system behaviors. We demonstrate that the semantics of Little-JIL are sufficiently well defined to support the application of static dataflow analysis, enabling the verification of critical properties of the agent systems. This approach is inherently a top-down approach that complements bottom-up approaches to reasoning about system behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. N. S. Barghouti and G. E. Kaiser. Multi-agent rule-based development environments. In 5th Annual Knowledge-Based Software Assistant Conference, pages 375–387, Syracuse NY, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. R. Burch, E. M. Clarke, K. L. McMillan, D. L. Dill, and L. J. Hwang. Symbolic model checking: 1020 states and beyond. In Fifth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pages 428–439, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. M. Cobleigh, L. A. Clarke, and L. J. Osterweil. Verifying properties of process definitions. In ACM SIGSOFT 2000 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, Portland, OR, 2000. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. S. Decker and V. R. Lesser. Designing a family of coordination algorithms. In First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pages 73–80, San Francisco, CA, 1995. AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Dwyer and L. A. Clarke. Data flow analysis for verifying properties of concurrent programs. In Second ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, pages 62–75, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. B. Dwyer and L. A. Clarke. Flow analysis for verifying specifications of concurrent and distributed software. Technical Report 99-52, University of Massachusetts, Computer Science Dept., 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. J. Holzmann. The model checker SPIN. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 23(5):279–294, 1997.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. B. S. Lerner, L. J. Osterweil, S. M. Sutton, Jr., and A. Wise. Programming process coordination in Little-JIL. In 6th European Workshop on Software Process Technology (EWSPT’ 98), pages 127–131, Weybridge, UK, 1998. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. R. Lesser. Multiagent systems: An emerging subdiscipline of AI. ACM Computing Surveys, 27(3):340–342, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K. L. McMillan. Symbolic Model Checking: An Approach to the State Explosion Problem. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Sandholm and V. Lesser. Issues in automated negotiation and electronic commerce: Extending the contract net framework. In First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS-95), San Francisco, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. Wagner and V. Lesser. Toward ubiquitous satisficing agent control. In AAAI Symposium on Satisficing Models, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Wise. Little-JIL 1.0 language report. Technical Report 98-24, Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Wise, B. S. Lerner, E. K. McCall, L. J. Osterweil, and S. M. Sutton, Jr. Specifying coordination in processes using Little-JIL. Technical Report 99-71, Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. R. Wurman, M. P. Wellman, and W. E. Walsh. The Michigan internet AuctionBot: A configurable auction server for human and software agents. In Second International Conference of Autonomous Agents, Minneapolis, MN, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Osterweil, L.J., Clarke, L.A. (2001). Frameworks for Reasoning about Agent Based System. In: Wagner, T., Rana, O.F. (eds) Infrastructure for Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Scalable Multi-Agent Systems. AGENTS 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1887. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47772-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47772-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42315-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47772-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics