Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Subject Knowledge, Source of Terms, and Term Selection in Query Expansion: An Analytical Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2291))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The role of subject and search knowledge in query expansion (QE) is an unmapped terrain in research on information retrieval. It is likely that both have an impact on the process and outcome of QE. In this paper our aim is an analytical study of the connections between subject and search knowledge and term selection in QE based both on thesaurus and relevance feedback. We will also argue analytically how thesaurus, term suggestion in interactive QE and term extraction in automatic QE support users with differing levels of subject knowledge in their pursuit of search concepts and terms. It is suggested that in QE the initial query concepts representing the information need should not be treated as separate entities, but as conceptually interrelated. These interrelations contribute to the meaning of the conceptual construct, which the query represents, and this should be reflected in the terms identified for QE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anick, P. & Tiperneni, S. The paraphrase search assistant: terminological feedback for iterative information seeking. In Proceedings of the SIGIR’99. ACM, New York (1999) 153–159

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bates, M. Subject access to online catologs: A design model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 37 (6) (1986) 357–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bates, M. Indexing and access for digital libraries and the internet: Human, database, and domain factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49 (13) (1998) 1185–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Belkin, N. & Cool, C. & Head, J. & Jeng, J. Kelly, D. & al., Relevance Feedback versus Local Context Analysis as term suggestion devices: Rutgers’ TREC-8 interactive track experience. In: Proceedings of TREC-8. Available from: (20001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blair, D. & Maron, M. An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document retrieval system. Communications of the ACM. 28 (3) (1985) 289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Borgman, C. Why are online catologs still hard to use? Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47 (1996) 493–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brajnik, G., Mizzarro, S. & Tasso, C. Evaluating user interfaces to information retrieval systems. A case study. In Proceedings of the SIGIR’96. ACM, New York (1996) 128–136

    Google Scholar 

  8. Croft, B. & Das, R. Experiment with query acquisition and use in document retrieval systems. In: Proceedings of the SIGIR’90. Springer, Berlin (1990) 368–376

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eftimiadis, E. Query expansion. In: M.E. Williams (ed), Annual review of information science and technology, vol 31. N.J.: Information Today, Medford (1996) 121–187

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eftimiadis, E. Interactive query expansion: A user-based evaluation in relevance feedback environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51 (11) (2000) 989–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fenichel, C. The process of searching online bibliographic databases. Library Research 2 (1981) 107–127

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fidel, R. Searchers’ selection of search keys: III searching styles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42 (1991) 515–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fowkes, H., & Beaulieu, M. Interactive searching behavior: Okapi experiment for TREC-8. In Proceedings of the BCS-IRSG: 22nd Annual Colloquium on Information Retrieval Research. Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greenberg, J. Automatic query expansion via lexical-semantic relationships. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 52(2) (2001a) 402–415

    Google Scholar 

  15. Greenberg, J. Optimal query expansion processing methods with semantically encoded structured thesauri terminology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 52(6) (2001b) 487–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hahn, U., & Chater, N. Concepts and similarity. In K. Lamberts, & D. Shanks (Eds.), Knowledge, concepts and categories. Psychology Press, Hove (1997) 43–92

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hancock-Beaulieu, M. & Fieldhouse, M. & Do, T. An evaluation of interactive query expansion in an online library catalogue with graphical user interface. Journal of Documentation. 51(3) (1995) 225–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Harter, S. Online information retrieval. Academic Press, Orlando (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hawking, D. & Thistlewaite, P. & Bailey, B. ANU/ACSys TREC-5 experiments. In: E. Voorhees & D. Harman (eds), Information technology: The fifth text retrieval conference (TREC-5). MD, Gaithersburg (1997) 359–375

    Google Scholar 

  20. Heit, E. Knowledge and concept learning. In K. Lamberts, & D. Shanks (Eds.), Knowledge, Concepts and Categories. Psychology Press, Hove (1997) 7–41

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hsieh-Yee, I. Effects of search experience and subject knowledge on the search tactics of novice and experienced searchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 44 (1993) 161–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ingwersen, P. Information retrieval interaction. Taylor Graham, London (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Isenberg, D. Thinking and managing: a verbal protocol analysis of managerial problem solving. Academy of Management Journal. 20 (1986) 775–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jones, S & Gatford, M. & Robertson, S. & Hancock-Beaulieu, M. & Secker, J. Interactive thesaurus navigation: Intelligence rules OK? Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46 (1) (1995) 52–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Järvelin, K. & Kekäläinen, J., IR evaluayion methods for highly relevant documents. Proceedings of the SIGIR’00. ACM, New York (2000) 41–48

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kekäläinen, J. The effects of query complexity, expansion and structure on retrieval performance in probabilistic text retrieval. Doctoral Dissertation. Tampere University Press, Tampere (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kekäläinen, J. & Järvelin, K. The impact of query structure and query extension on retrieval performance. In: Proceedings of the SIGIR’98. ACM, New York (1998) 130–137

    Google Scholar 

  28. Koenemann, J. & Belkin, N. A case for interaction: A study of interactive information retrieval behavior and effectiveness. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference (CHI’96). ACM Press, New York (1996) 205–212

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kuhlthau, C. Seeking Meaning. Norwood, N.J. Ablex (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lancaster, W & Warner, A. Information retrieval today. VA: Information Resources Press, Arlington (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lormand, E. How to be a meaning holist. The Journal of Philosophy. 93 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Marchionini, G. Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge University Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mitra, M.. & Singhal, A. & Buckley, C. Improving automatic query expansion. In Proceedings of the SIGIR’98. ACM, New York (1998) 206–214

    Google Scholar 

  34. Partridge, D., & Hussain K. Knowledge based information-systems. McGraw-Hill, London (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Patel, V. & Ramoni, M. Cognitive models of directional inference in expert medical reasoning. In P. Feltovich, & K. Ford, & R. Hoffman (Eds.), Expertise in context: human and machine. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (Calif.) (1997) 67–99

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sormunen, E. A method of measuring wide range performance of Boolean queries in fulltext databases. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 748. Doctoral Dissertation. Tampere University Press, Tampere (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sormunen, E. & Kekäläinen, J. & Koivisto, J. Järvelin, K. Document text characteristics affect the ranking of the most relevant documents by expanded structured queries. Journal of Documentation. 57 (3) (2001) 358–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Spink, A., Greisdorf, R., & Bateman, J. From highly relevant to non-relevant: examining different regions of relevance. Information Processing & Management. 34 (1998) 599–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Stinchcombe, A. Constructing Social Theories. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sutcliffe, A., & Ennis, M. Towards a cognitive theory of IR. Interacting with Computers. 10 (1998) 321–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sutcliffe, A., Ennis, M., & Watkinson, S. Empirical studies of end-user information searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51 (2000) 1211–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Swanson, D. Historical note: Information retrieval and the future of an illusion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 39 (4) (1988) 92–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Turtle, H. & Croft, W. Evaluation of inference network-based retrieval model. ACM transactions on information systems. 9 (3) (1991) 187–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Vakkari, P. Cognition and changes of search terms and tactics during task performance. Proceedings of the RIAO’2000 Conference Paris: C.I.D. (2000) 894–907. Also: http://www.info.uta.fi/informaatio/vakkari/Vakkari_Tactics_RIAO2000.html

  45. Vakkari, P. A Theory of the Task-based Information Retrieval. Journal of Documentation. 57 (1) (2001) 44–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Vakkari, P., & Hakala, N. Changes in relevance criteria and problem stages in task performance. Journal of Documentation. 56 (2000) 540–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Vakkari, P. & Pennanen, M. & Serola, S. Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal: A longitudinal case study. Submitted for publication (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wang, P. User’s information needs at different stages of a research project: a cognitive view. In P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen, & B., Dervin (Eds.), Information Seeking in Context. Taylor, London & Los Angeles (1997) 307–318

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Studies, University of Tampere, FIN-33014, Finland

    Pertti Vakkari

Authors
  1. Pertti Vakkari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, 26 Richmond Street, G1 1XH, Glasgow, UK

    Fabio Crestani

  2. School of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Paisley, High Street, PA1 2BE, Paisley, UK

    Mark Girolami

  3. Computing Science Department, University of Glasgow, 17 Lilybank Gardens, G12 8RZ, Glasgow, UK

    Cornelis Joost van Rijsbergen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vakkari, P. (2002). Subject Knowledge, Source of Terms, and Term Selection in Query Expansion: An Analytical Study. In: Crestani, F., Girolami, M., van Rijsbergen, C.J. (eds) Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2291. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45886-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45886-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43343-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45886-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation