Skip to main content

Belief Revision by Lamarckian Evolution

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Applications of Evolutionary Computing (EvoWorkshops 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2037))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We propose a multi-agent genetic algorithm to accomplish belief revision. The algorithm implements a new evolutionary strategy resulting from a combination of Darwinian and Lamarckian approaches. Besides encompassing the Darwinian operators of selection, mutation and crossover, it comprises a Lamarckian operator that mutates the genes in a chromosome that code for the believed assumptions. These self mutations are performed as a consequence of the chromosome phenotype’s experience obtained while solving a belief revision problem. They are directed by a belief revision procedure which relies on tracing the logical derivations leading to inconsistency of belief, so as to remove the latter’s support on the gene coded assumptions, by mutating the genes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T.M. Mitchell. Machine Learning. McGraw Hill, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Erick Cantú-Paz. A survey of parallel genetic algorithms.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C.V. Damásio, L.M. Pereira, and M. Schroeder. REVISE: Logic programming and diagnosis. In Proceedings of Logic-Programming and Non-Monotonic Reasoning, LPNMR’97, volume 1265 of LNAI, Germany, 1997. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.J. Alferes, L.M. Pereira, and T.C. Przymusinski. “Classical” negation in non-monotonic reasoning and logic programming. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 20:107–142, 1998.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Van Gelder, K.A. Ross, and J.S. Schlipf. The well-founded semantics for general logic programs. Journal of the ACM, 38(3):620–650, 1991.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. L.M. Pereira, C.V. Damásio, and J.J. Alferes. Diagnosis and debugging as contradiction removal. In L.M. Pereira and A. Nerode, editors, Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Logic Programming and Non-monotonic Reasoning, pages 316–330. MIT Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Lamma, L.M. Pereira, and F. Riguzzi. Multi-agent logic aided lamarckian learning. Technical Report DEIS-LIA-00-004, Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informatica e Sistemistica, University of Bologna (Italy), 2000. LIA Series no. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Brglez, P. Pownall, and R. Hum. Accelerated ATPG and fault grading via testability analysis. In Proceedings of IEEE Int. Symposium on Circuits and Systems, pages 695–698, 1985. The ISCAS85 benchmark netlist are available via ftp://www.mcnc.mcnc.org..

  9. W.E. Hart and R.K. Belew. Optimization with genetic algorithms hybrids that use local search. In R.K. Belew and M. Mitchell, editors, Adaptive Individuals in Evolving Populations. Addison Wesley, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D.H. Ackely and M.L. Littman. A case for lamarckian evolution. In C.G. Langton, editor, Artificial Life III. Addison Wesley, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Li, K.C. Tan, and M. Gong. Model reduction in control systems by means of global structure evolution and local parameter learning. In D. Dasgupta and Z. Michalewicz, editors, Evolutionary Algorithms in Engineering Applications. Springer Verlag, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.J. Grefenstette. Lamarckian learning in multi-agent environments. In Proc. 4th Intl. Conference on Genetic Algorithms. Morgan Kauffman, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Potter and K. de Jong. A cooperative coevolutionary approach to function optimization, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mitchell A. Potter, Kenneth A. De Jong, and John J. Grefenstette. A coevolutionary approach to learning sequential decision rules. In Larry Eshelman, editor, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pages 366–372, San Francisco, CA, 1995. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lamma, E., MonizPereira, L., Riguzzi, F. (2001). Belief Revision by Lamarckian Evolution. In: Boers, E.J.W. (eds) Applications of Evolutionary Computing. EvoWorkshops 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2037. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45365-2_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45365-2_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41920-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45365-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics