Skip to main content

Addressing Multiobjective Control: Safety and Performance through Constrained Optimization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control (HSCC 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2034))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We address systems which have multiple objectives: broadly speaking, these objectives can be thought of as safety and performance goals. Guaranteeing safety is our first priority, satisfying performance criteria our second. In this paper, we compute the system’s safe operating space and represent it in closed form, and then, within this space, we compute solutions which optimize a given performance criterion. We describe the methodology and illustrate it with two examples of systems in which safety is paramount: a two-aircraft collision avoidance scenario and the flight management system of a VSTOL aircraft. In these examples, performance criteria are met using mixed-integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) and nonlinear programming (NLP), respectively. Optimized trajectories for both systems demonstrate the effectiveness of this methodology on systems whose safety is critical.

Research supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellows- hip, by DARPA under the Software Enabled Control Program (administered by AFRL under contract F33615-99-C-3014), and by a Stanford University Terman Faculty Award.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Lygeros, C. Tomlin, and S. Sastry, “Multiobjective hybrid controller synthesis,” in Hybrid and Real-Time Systems (O. Maler, ed.), LNCS 1201, pp. 109–123, Grenoble: Springer Verlag, 1997. UCB/ERL Memo M97/59.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Oishi and C. Tomlin, “Switched nonlinear control of a VSTOL aircraft,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, (Phoenix, AZ), 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Tomlin, Hybrid Control of Air Traffic Management Systems. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, CA, September 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Biegler, “Efficient solution of dynamic optimization and MPC problems,” in Progress in Systems and Control Theory, vol. 26, pp. 219–243, Birkhauser Springer Verlag, 2000.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. V. Gopal and L. Biegler, “Large scale inequality constrained optimization and control,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 18, pp. 59–68, December 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Bemporad and M. Morari, “Control of systems integrating logic, dynamics, and constraints,” Automatica, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 407–427, 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Kerrigan, A. Bemporad, D. Mignone, M. Morari, and J. Maciejowski, “Multiobjective prioritisation and reconfiguration for the control of constrained hybrid systems,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 1694–1698, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Schulz, D. Shaner, and Y. Zhao, “Free-flight concept,” in Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Yang and J. Kuchar, “Prototype conflict alerting logic for free flight,” in Proceedings of the AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Paielli and H. Erzberger, “Free flight conflict detection and resolution analysis,” in Proceedings of the AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Schulz and Y. Zhao, “Deterministic resolution of two aircraft conflict in freeflight,” in AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. Gopal and R. Schulz, “Interior point methods for aircraft conflict resolution problems,” Proceedings of the SIAM Conference on Optimization, December 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Menon, G. Sweriduk, and B. Sridhar, “Optimal strategies for free-flight air traffic conflict resolutions,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 202–211, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. C. Tomlin, G. J. Pappas, and S. Sastry, “Conflict resolution for air traffic management: A case study in multi-agent hybrid systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 43, pp. 509–521, April 1998.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Oishi and C. Tomlin, “Switching in nonminimum phase systems: Applications to a VSTOL aircraft,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  16. “YAV-8B Simulation and Modeling,” Tech. Rep. CR-170397, NASA, March 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  17. I. Mitchell and C. Tomlin, “Level set methods for computation in hybrid systems,” in Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control (B. Krogh and N. Lynch, eds.), LNCS, Springer Verlag, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Oishi, “Safe collision avoidance maneuvers using constrained optimization,” Tech. Rep. SUDAAR 730, Stanford University, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Brooke, D. Kendrick, A. Meeraus, and R. Raman, GAMS: A User’s Guide. GAMS Development Corporation, Washington, DC, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Viswanathan, I. Grossman, and E. Kalvelagen, GAMS/DICOPT Solver Manual. Engineering Design Research Center, Carnegie Mellon University, and GAMS Development Corp. <http://www.gams.com>.

  21. A. Drud, “CONOPT-A large scale GRG code,” Operations Research Society of America Journal on Computing, no. 6, pp. 207–216, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  22. L. Biegler, C. Schmid, and D. Ternet, “A multiplier-free, reduced Hessian method for process optimization,” in Large-Scale Optimization with Applications, Part II: Optimal Design and Control, in IMA Volumes in Mathematics and Applications, Springer Verlag, 1997. 23. CPLEX Optimization Inc. http://www.cplex.com.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Oishi, M., Tomlin, C.J., Gopal, V., Godbole, D. (2001). Addressing Multiobjective Control: Safety and Performance through Constrained Optimization. In: Di Benedetto, M.D., Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A. (eds) Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control. HSCC 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2034. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45351-2_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45351-2_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41866-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45351-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics