Abstract
The integrity of complex software systems built from existing components is becoming more dependent on the integrity of the mechanisms used to interconnect these components and, in particular, on the ability of these mechanisms to cope with architectural mismatches that might exist between components. There is a need to detect and handle (i.e. to tolerate) architectural mismatches during runtime because in the majority of practical situations it is impossible to localize and correct all such mismatches during development time. When developing complex software systems, the problem is not only to identify the appropriate components, but also to make sure that these components are interconnected in a way that allows mismatches to be tolerated. The resulting architectural solution should be a system based on the existing components, which are independent in their nature, but are able to interact in well-understood ways. To find such a solution we apply general principles of fault tolerance to dealing with arch itectural mismatches
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
T. Anderson and P. Lee. Fault-Tolerance: Principles and Practice. Prentice-Hall Int. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 1981.
A. Avizienis, J.-C. Laprie, and B. Randell. Fundamental Concepts of Dependability. Technical Report 739. Department of Computing Science. University of Newcastle upon Tyne. 2001.
L. Bass, P. Clements, and R. Kazman. Software Architecture in Practice. Addison-Wesley. 1998.
D. Compare, P. Inverardi, and A.L. Wolf. “Uncovering Architectural Mismatch in Component Behavior”. Science of Computer Programming (33) 2. 1999. pp. 101–131.
F. Cristian. “Exception Handling”. Dependability of Resilient Computers. T. Anderson (Ed.). Blackwell Scientific Publications. 1989. pp. 68–97.
R. de Lemos and A. Romanovsky. “Exception Handling in the Software Lifecycle”. International Journal of Computer Systems Science & Engineering 16(2). March 2001. pp. 167–181.
R. DeLine. “A Catalog of Techniques for Resolving Packaging Mismatch”. Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Software Reusability (SSRV9). Los Angeles, CA. May 1999. pp. 44–53.
A. Egyed, N. Medvidovic, and C. Gacek. “Component-Based Perspective on Software Mismatch Detection and Resolution”. IEE Proceedings on Software 147(6). December 2000. pp. 225–236.
C. Gacek, A. Abd-Allah, B. Clark, and B. Boehm, “On the Definition of Software Architecture”. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Architectures for Software Systems-In Cooperation with the 17th International Conference on Software Engineering. D. Garlan (Ed.). Seattle, WA, USA. April 1995. pp. 85–95.
C. Gacek. Detecting Architectural Mismatches during System Composition. PhD Dissertation. Center for Software Engineering. University of Southern California. Los Angeles, CA, USA. 1998.
D. Garlan, R. Allen, and J. Ockerbloom, “Architectural Mismatch: Why Reuse is so Hard”. IEEE Software 12(6). November 1995. pp. 17–26.
P. Inverardi, A.L. Wolf, and D. Yankelevich. “Checking Assumptions in Component Dynamics at the Architectural Level”. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Coordination Models and Languages. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1282. Springer, Berlin. September 1997. pp. 46–63.
C. Jones, A. Romanovsky, and I. Welch. A Structured Approach to Handling On-Line Interface Upgrades. Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC 2002). Oxford, UK. August 2002. IEEE CS Press, pp. 1000–1005.
J.-C. Laprie. “Dependable Computing: Concepts, Limits, Challenges”. Special Issue of the 25th International Symposium On Fault-Tolerant Computing. IEEE Computer Society Press. Pasadena, CA. June 1995. pp. 42–54
N. Medvidovic, D.S. Rosenblum, and R.N. Taylor. “A Language and Environment for Architecture-Based Software Development and Evolution”. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSEV9). Los Angeles, CA. May 1999. pp. 44–53.
N. Medvidovic and R.N. Taylor. “A Classification and Comparison Framework for Software Architecture Description Languages”. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 26(1). 2000. pp. 70–93.
P. Oberndorf, K. Wallnau, and A.M. Zaremski. “Product Lines: Reusing Architectural Assets within an Organization”. Software Architecture in Practice. Eds. L. Bass, P. Clements, R. Kazman. Addison-Wesley. 1998. pp. 331–344.
D.E. Perry and A.L. Wolf. “Foundations for the Study of Software Architecture”. SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 17(4). 1992. pp. 40–52.
D.S. Roseblum and R. Natarajan. “Supporting Architectural Concerns in Component Interoperability Standards”. IEE Proceedings on Software 147(6). December 2000. pp. 215–223.
M. Shaw and D. Garlan. Software Architecture: Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline. Prentice-Hall. 1996.
R.N. Taylor, N. Medvidovic, K.M. Anderson, E.J. Whitehead, J.E. Robbins, K.A. Nies, P. Oreizy, and D.L. Dubrow “A Component-and Message-Based Architectural Style for GUI Software”. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 22(6). June 1996. pp. 390–406.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
de Lemos, R., Gacek, C., Romanovsky, A. (2003). Architectural Mismatch Tolerance. In: de Lemos, R., Gacek, C., Romanovsky, A. (eds) Architecting Dependable Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2677. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45177-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45177-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40727-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45177-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive