Skip to main content

Error Characterization of the Factorization Approach to Shape and Motion Recovery

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1883))

Abstract

This paper is focused on error characterization of the factorization approach to shape and motion recovery from image sequence using results from matrix perturbation theory and covariance propagation for linear models. Given the 2-D projections of a set of points across multiple image frames and small perturbation on image coordinates, first order perturbation and covariance matrices for 3-D affine/Euclidean shape and motion are derived and validated with the ground truth. The propagation of the small perturbation and covariance matrix provides better understanding of the factorization approach and its results, provides error sensitivity information for 3-D affine/Euclidean shape and moton subject to small image error. Experimental results are demonstrated to support the analysis and show how the error analysis and error measures can be used.

This work is supported by Siemens Corporate Research, Princeton, NJ 08540

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Tomasi and T. Kanade. Shape and motion from image streams under orthography: A factorization method. International Journal on Computer Vision, 9(2):137–154, November 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Joseph L. Mundy and Andrew Zisserman. Geometric Invariance in Computer Vision. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Weinshall and C. Tomasi. Linear and incremental acquisition of invariant shape models from image sequences. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis Machine Intelligence, 17(5):512–517, May 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C.J. Poelman and T. Kanade. A paraperspective factorization method for shape and motion recovery. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis Machine Intelligence, 19(3):206–218, March1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Quan. Self-calibration of an affine camera from multiple views. International Journal on Computer Vision, 19(1):93–105, July 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Sturm and B. Triggs. A factorization based algorithm for multi-image projective structure and motion. In Computer Vision-ECCV’96, volume 1065, pages II:709–720. Springer Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Morita and T. Kanade. A sequential factorization method for recovering shape and motion from image streams. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis Machine Intellgence, 19(8):858–867, August1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Quan and T. Kanade. Affine structure from line correspondences with uncalibrated affine cameras. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis Machine Intelligence, 19(8):834–845, August 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Daniel D. Morris and Takeo Kanade. A unified factorization algorithm for points, line segments and planes with uncertainty. In International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 696–702, Bombay, India, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Weng, T. S. Huang, and N. Ahuja. Motion and structure from two perspective views: Algorithms, error analysis and error estimation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis Machine Intelligence, PAMI-11(5):451–476, May 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Weng, N. Ahuja, and T.S. Huang. Optimal motion and structure estimation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis Machine Intelligence, 15(9):864–884, September 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Tomasi and J. Zhang. Is structure-from-motion worth pursuing. In Seventh International Symposium on Robotics Research, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Daniilidis and M. Spetsakis. Understanding noise sensitivity in structure from motion. In Y. Aloimonos editor, Visual Navigation, pages 61–88. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. H. Wilkinson. The Algebraic Eigenvalue Problem. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, 1965.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Gene H. Golub and C. F. van Loan. Matrix computations. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 1996.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sun, Z., Ramesh, V., Tekalp, A.M. (2000). Error Characterization of the Factorization Approach to Shape and Motion Recovery. In: Triggs, B., Zisserman, A., Szeliski, R. (eds) Vision Algorithms: Theory and Practice. IWVA 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1883. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44480-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44480-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67973-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44480-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics