Skip to main content

A Model for the Structural, Functional, and Deontic Specification of Organizations in Multiagent Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2507))

Abstract

A Multiagent System (MAS) that explicitly represents its organization normally focuses either on the functioning or the structure of this organization. However, addressing both aspects is a prolific approach when one wants to design or describe a MAS organization. The problem is to define these aspects in such a way that they can be both assembled in a single coherent specification. The ℳOISE+ model — described here through a soccer team example — intends to be a step in this direction since the organization is seen under three points of view: structural, functional, and deontic.

Supported by FURB, Brazil; and CNPq, Brazil, grant 200695/01-0.

Partially supported by CNPq, Brazil, grant 301041/95-4; and by CNPq/NSF PROTEM-CC MAPPEL project, grant 680033/99-8.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Thibault Carron and Olivier Boissier. Towards a temporal organizational structure language for dynamic multi-agent systems. In Pre-Proceeding of the 10th European Workshop on Modeling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World (MAAMAW’2001), Annecy, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cristiano Castelfranchi. Commitments: From individual intentions to groups and organizations. In Toru Ishida, editor, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS’96), pages 41–48. AAAI Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cristiano Castelfranchi. Modeling social action for AI agents. Artificial Intelligence (103):157–182, 1998.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Keith Decker and Victor Lesser. Task environment centered design of organizations. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Computational Organization Design, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jaques Ferber and Olivier Gutknecht. A meta-model for the analysis and design of organizations in multi-agents systems. In Yves Demazeau, editor, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS’98), pages 128–135. IEEE Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mark S. Fox, Mihai Barbuceanu, Michael Gruninger, and Jinxin Lon. An organizational ontology for enterprise modeling. In Michael J. Prietula, Kathleen M. Carley, and Les Gasser, editors, Simulating Organizations: Computational Models of Institutions and Groups, chapter 7, pages 131–152. AAAI Press / MIT Press, Menlo Park, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Francisco Garijo, Jorge J. Gómes-Sanz, Juan Pavón, and Philippe Massonet. Multi-agent system organization: An engineering prespective. In Pre-Proceeding of the 10th European Workshop on Modeling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World (MAAMAW’2001), Annecy, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Les Gasser. Organizations in multi-agent systems. In Pre-Proceeding of the 10th European Worshop on Modeling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World (MAAMAW’2001), Annecy, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mahdi Hannoun, Olivier Boissier, Jaime Simão Sichman, and Claudette Sayettat. Moise: An organizational model for multi-agent systems. In Maria Carolina Monard and Jaime Simão Sichman, editors, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference, 7th Ibero-American Conference on AI, 15th Brazilian Symposium on AI (IBERAMIA/SBIA’ 2000), Atibaia, SP, Brazil, November 2000, LNAI 1952, pages 152–161, Berlin, 2000. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Christian Lemaître and Cora B. Excelente. Multi-agent organization approach. In Francisco J. Garijo and Christian Lemaître, editors, Proceedings of II Iberoamerican Workshop on DAI and MAS, Toledo, Spain, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. V. Nagendra Prasad, Keith Decker, Alan Garvey, and Victor Lesser. Exploring organizational design with TAEMS: A case study of distributed data processing. In Toru Ishida, editor, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS’96), pages 283–290. AAAI Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Young-pa So and Edmund H. Durfee. An organizational self-design model for organizational change. In AAAI93 Workshop on AI and Theories of Groups and Oranizations, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gerhard Weiß. Some studies in distributed machine learning and organizational design. Technical Report FKI-189-94, Institut für Informatik, Technische Universität München, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hübner, J.F., Sichman, J.S., Boissier, O. (2002). A Model for the Structural, Functional, and Deontic Specification of Organizations in Multiagent Systems. In: Bittencourt, G., Ramalho, G.L. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. SBIA 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2507. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36127-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36127-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00124-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36127-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics