Skip to main content

On Solving Presburger and Linear Arithmetic with SAT

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2517))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We show a reduction to propositional logic from quantifier-free Presburger arithmetic, and disjunctive linear arithmetic, based on Fourier-Motzkin elimination. While the complexity of this procedure is not better than competing techniques, it has practical advantages in solving verification problems. It also promotes the option of deciding a combination of theories by reducing them to this logic.

This research was supported in part by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) and the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) under contract no. N00014-01-1-0796

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Barrett, D. Dill, and J. Levitt. Validity checking for combinations of theories with equality. In M. Srivas and A. Camilleri, editors, Proc. FMCAD 1996, volume 1166 of LNCS. Springer-Verlag, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.J.C. Bik and H.A.G. Wijshoff. Implementation of Fourier-Motzkin elimination. Technical Report 94-42, Dept. of Computer Science, Leiden University, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R.E. Bryant, S. German, and M. Velev. Exploiting positive equality in a logic of equality with uninterpreted functions. In Proc. 11 th Intl. Conference on Computer Aided Verification (CAV’99), 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.E. Bryant, S. German, and M. Velev. Processor verification using efficient reductions of the logic of uninterpreted functions to propositional logic. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 2(1):1–41, 2001.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. R.E. Bryant and M. Velev. Boolean satisfiability with transitivity constraints. In E.A. Emerson and A.P. Sistla, editors, Proc. 12 th Intl. Conference on Computer Aided Verification (CAV’00), volume 1855 of Lect. Notes in Comp. Sci. Springer-Verlag, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Dantzig. Linear Programming and Extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey., 1963.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. W. M. Farmer, J. D. Guttman, and F. J. Thayer. IMPS: System description. In D. Kapur, editor, Automated Deduction-CADE-11, volume 607 of Lect. Notes in Comp. Sci., pages 701–705. Springer-Verlag, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.C. Filliatre, S. Owre, H. Rueb, and N. Shankar. ICS: Integrated canonizer and solver. In G. Berry, H. Comon, and A. Finkel, editors, Proc. 13th Intl. Conference on Computer Aided Verification (CAV’01), LNCS. Springer-Verlag, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Goel, K. Sajid, H. Zhou, A. Aziz, and V. Singhal. BDD based procedures for a theory of equality with uninterpreted functions. In A.J. Hu and M.Y. Vardi, editors, CAV98, volume 1427 of LNCS. Springer-Verlag, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Johannsen. Reducing bitvector satisfiability problems to scale down design sizes for rtl property checking. In IEEE Proc. HLDVT’01, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. G. Khachiyan. A polynomial algorithm in linear programming. Soviet Mathematics Doklady, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Moskewicz, C. Madigan, Y. Zhao, L. Zhang, and S. Malik. Chaff: Engineering an efficient SAT solver. In Proc. Design Automation Conference 2001 (DAC’01), 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Nelson and D. C. Oppen. Simplification by cooperating decision procedures. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Owre, N. Shankar, and J.M. Rushby. User guide for the PVS specification and verification system. Technical report, SRI International, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Pnueli, Y. Rodeh, O. Shtrichman, and M. Siegel. Deciding equality formulas by small-domains instantiations. In Proc. 11 th Intl. Conference on Computer Aided Verification (CAV’99), Lect. Notes in Comp. Sci. Springer-Verlag, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. PORTA. http://elib.zib.de/pub/packages/mathprog/polyth/porta/.

  17. W. Pugh. The omega test: a fast and practical integer programming algorithm for dependence analysis. Communications of the ACM, pages 102–114, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. Pugh and D. Wonnacott. Experiences with constraint-based array dependence analysis. In Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming, pages 312–325, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. O. Strichman. Optimizations in decision procedures for propositional linear inequalities. Technical Report CMU-CS-02-133, Carnegie Mellon University, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  20. O. Strichman, S.A. Seshia, and R.E. Bryant. Deciding separation formulas with SAT. In Proc. 14th Intl. Conference on Computer Aided Verification (CAV’02), LNCS, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 2002. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Strichman, O. (2002). On Solving Presburger and Linear Arithmetic with SAT. In: Aagaard, M.D., O’Leary, J.W. (eds) Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design. FMCAD 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2517. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36126-X_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36126-X_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00116-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36126-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics