Skip to main content

An Overview of Alternative Rule Evaluation Criteria and Their Use in Separate-and-Conquer Classifiers

  • Conference paper
Foundations of Intelligent Systems (ISMIS 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4203))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Separate-and-conquer classifiers strongly depend on the criteria used to choose which rules will be included in the classification model. When association rules are employed to build such classifiers (as in ART [3]), rule evaluation can be performed attending to different criteria (other than the traditional confidence measure used in association rule mining). In this paper, we analyze the desirable properties of such alternative criteria and their effect in building rule-based classifiers using a separate-and-conquer strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ali, K., Manganaris, S., Srikant, R.: Partial classification using association rules. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Databases and Data Mining, Newport Beach, California, USA, August 14–17, 1997, pp. 115–118 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berzal, F., Blanco, I., Sanchez, D., Vila, M.A.: Measuring the accuracy and interest of association rules: A new framework. Intelligent Data Analysis 6(3), 221–235 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Berzal, F., Cubero, J.C., Sánchez, D., Serrano, J.M.: Art: A hybrid classification model. Machine Learning 54(1), 67–92 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Brin, S., Motwani, R., Ullman, J.D., Tsur, S.: Dynamic itemset counting and implication rules for market basket data. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of Data, Tucson, Arizona, USA, May 11-15, pp. 255–264 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, C.-H., Shim, D.-G.: A multistrategy approach to classification learning in databases. Data & Knowledge Engineering 31, 67–93 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen, W.: Fast effective rule induction. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Machine Learning, Tahoe City, CA USA, July 1995, pp. 115–123 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dong, G., Li, J.: Efficient mining of emerging patterns: discovering trends and differences. In: Proceedings of the fifth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Diego, CA, USA, August 15–18, 1999, pp. 43–52 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dong, G., Zhang, X., Wong, L., Li, J.: Caep: Classification by aggregating emerging patterns. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Discovery Science, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 30–42 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kodratoff, Y.: Comparing machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases. In: Paliouras, G., Karkaletsis, V., Spyropoulos, C.D. (eds.) ACAI 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2049, pp. 1–21. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, W., Han, J., Pei, J.: Cmar: Accurate and efficient classification based on multiple class-association rules. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2001), San Jose, California, USA, November 29 - December 02, 2001, pp. 208–217 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, B., Hsu, W., Ma, Y.: Integrating classification and association rule mining. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 1998), New York City, USA, August 27–31, 1998, pp. 80–86 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, B., Hu, M., Hsu, W.: Intuitive representation of decision trees using general rules and exceptions. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2000), Austin, Texas, July 30 - August 3, 2000, pp. 30–42 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, B., Hu, M., Hsu, W.: Multi-level organization and summarization of the discovered rule. In: Proceedings of the sixth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Boston, MA, USA, August 20-23, 2000, pp. 208–217 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, B., Ma, Y., Wong, C.K.: Improving an association rule based classifier. In: Zighed, A.D.A., Komorowski, J., Żytkow, J.M. (eds.) PKDD 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1910, pp. 80–86. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Meretakis, D., Wuthrich, B.: Extending naive bayes classifiers using long itemsets. In: Proceedings of the fifth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Diego, CA, USA, August 15–18, 1999, pp. 165–174 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Silverstein, C., Brin, S., Motwani, R.: Beyond market baskets: Generalizing association rules to dependence rules. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 22(2), 39–68 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, K., Zhou, S., He, Y.: Growing decision trees on support-less association rules. In: Proceedings of the sixth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Boston, MA, USA, August 20–23, 2000, pp. 265–269 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, K., Zhou, S., Liew, S.C.: Building hierarchical classifiers using class proximity. In: Proceedings of 25th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB 1999), Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, September 7–10, 1999, pp. 363–374 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yin, X., Han, J.: Cpar: Classification based on predictive association rules. In: Proceedings of the Third SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA, May 1-3, 2003, pp. 208–217 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Berzal, F., Cubero, JC., Marín, N., Polo, JL. (2006). An Overview of Alternative Rule Evaluation Criteria and Their Use in Separate-and-Conquer Classifiers. In: Esposito, F., Raś, Z.W., Malerba, D., Semeraro, G. (eds) Foundations of Intelligent Systems. ISMIS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4203. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11875604_66

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11875604_66

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-45764-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45766-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics