Skip to main content

Some Methodological Observations Resulting from Experience Using LSCs and the Play-In/Play-Out Approach

  • Conference paper
Scenarios: Models, Transformations and Tools

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 3466))

Abstract

The play-in/play-out approach is a method for specifying and developing complex reactive systems. It is built upon a scenario-based philosophy, and uses the language of live sequence charts (LSCs) and a support tool called the Play-Engine. We present some conclusions from the initial experience we have had using the approach on several projects, and discuss methodological aspects rising from this experience. The projects are from aviation, telecommunication and system manufacturing domains.

This research was supported in part by the John von Neumann Minerva Center for the Verification of Reactive Systems, by the European Commission projects OMEGA (IST-2001-33522) and AMETIST (IST-2001-35304) and by the Israel Science Foundation (grant No. 287/02-1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amyot, D., Eberlein, A.: An Evaluation of Scenario Notations and Construction Approaches for Telecommunication Systems Development. Telecommunications Systems Journal 24(1), 61–94 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alur, R., Holzmann, G.J., Peled, D.: An analyzer for message sequence charts. Software Concepts and Tools 17(2), 70–77 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Albert, S.: Cybernetix case-study: Informal description. Ametist web page (2002), http://ametist.cs.utwente.nl

  4. Alur, R., Yannakakis, M.: Model checking of message sequence charts. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Mauw, S. (eds.) CONCUR 1999. LNCS, vol. 1664, pp. 114–129. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Barak, D., Harel, D., Marelly, R.: InterPlay: Horizontal Scale-Up and Transition to Design in Scenario-Based Programming. In: Desel, J., Reisig, W., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) Lectures on Concurrency and Petri Nets. LNCS, vol. 3098, pp. 66–86. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Jha, S., Lu, Y., Veith, H.: Counterexample-guided abstraction refinement. In: Emerson, E.A., Sistla, A.P. (eds.) CAV 2000. LNCS, vol. 1855, pp. 154–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Long, D.E., Zhao, X.: Efficient generation of counterexamples and witnesses in symbolic model checking. In: Proc. Design Automation Conference 1995, DAC 1995 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Damm, W., Harel, D.: LSCs: Breathing life into message sequence charts. Formal Methods in System Design 19(1), 45–80 (2001); Preliminary version appeared in Proc. 3rd IFIP Int. Conf. on Formal Methods for Open Object-Based Distributed Systems (FMOODS 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Damm, W., Klose, J.: Verification of a radio-based signalling system using the statemate verification environment. Formal Methods in System Design 19(2), 121–141 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gilboa, A.: Finding All Super-Steps in LSC Specifications. Master’s thesis, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gunter, E.L., Muscholl, A., Peled, D.: Compositional message sequence charts. In: Margaria, T., Yi, W. (eds.) TACAS 2001. LNCS, vol. 2031, pp. 496–511. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Harel, D., Kugler, H., Marelly, R., Pnueli, A.: Smart play-out of behavioral requirements. In: Aagaard, M.D., O’Leary, J.W. (eds.) FMCAD 2002. LNCS, vol. 2517, pp. 378–398. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Harel, D., Marelly, R.: Come, Let’s Play: Scenario-Based Programming Using LSCs and the Play-Engine. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harel, D., Marelly, R.: Specifying and Executing Behavioral Requirements: The Play In/Play-Out Approach. Software and System Modeling (SoSyM) 2(2), 82–107 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Henriksen, J.G., Mukund, M., Kumar, K.N., Thiagarajan, P.S.: On message sequence graphs and finitely generated regular MSC languages. In: Welzl, E., Montanari, U., Rolim, J.D.P. (eds.) ICALP 2000. LNCS, vol. 1853, pp. 675–686. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Henriksen, J.G., Mukund, M., Kumar, K.N., Thiagarajan, P.S.: Regular collections of Message Sequence Charts. In: Nielsen, M., Rovan, B. (eds.) MFCS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1893, pp. 675–686. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Rhapsody. I-Logix, Inc., products web page, http://www.ilogix.com/products/

  18. Kam, N., Harel, D., Kugler, H., Marelly, R., Pnueli, A., Hubbard, E.J.A., Stern, M.J.: Formal Modeling of C. elegans Development: A Scenario-Based Approach. In: Priami, C. (ed.) CMSB 2003. LNCS, vol. 2602, pp. 4–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Krüger, I.: Distributed System Design with Message Sequence Charts. PhD thesis, Department of Informatics, The Technical University of Munich (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kurshan, R.P.: Computer Aided Verification of Coordinating Processes. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Klose, J., Wittke, H.: An automata based interpretation of live sequence chart. In: Margaria, T., Yi, W. (eds.) TACAS 2001. LNCS, vol. 2031, p. 512. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Lettrari, M., Klose, J.: Scenario-based monitoring and testing of real-time UML models. In: 4th Int. Conf. on the Unified Modeling Language, Toronto (October 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marelly, R., Harel, D., Kugler, H.: Multiple instances and symbolic variables in executable sequence charts. In: Proc. 17th Ann. ACM Conf. on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages and Applications (OOPSLA 2002), Seattle, WA, pp. 83–100 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Muscholl, A., Peled, D., Su, Z.: Deciding properties for message sequence charts. In: Nivat, M. (ed.) FOSSACS 1998. LNCS, vol. 1378, pp. 226–242. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Mauw, S., Reniers, M.A.: Refinement in interworkings. In: Sassone, V., Montanari, U. (eds.) CONCUR 1996. LNCS, vol. 1119, pp. 671–686. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  26. UML. Documentation of the unified modeling language (UML). Available from the Object Management Group (OMG), http://www.omg.org

  27. Z.120 ITU-TS Recommendation Z.120: Message Sequence Chart (MSC). ITU-TS Geneva (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Harel, D., Kugler, H., Weiss, G. (2005). Some Methodological Observations Resulting from Experience Using LSCs and the Play-In/Play-Out Approach. In: Leue, S., Systä, T.J. (eds) Scenarios: Models, Transformations and Tools. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3466. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11495628_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11495628_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26189-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32032-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics