Skip to main content

Data Envelopment Analysis

History, Models and Interpretations

  • Chapter
Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis

Abstract

In a relatively short period of time Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has grown into a powerful quantitative, analytical tool for measuring and evaluating performance. DEA has been successfully applied to a host of different types of entities engaged in a wide variety of activities in many contexts worldwide. This chapter discusses the fundamental DEA models and some of their extensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Afriat, S., 1972, Efficiency estimation of production functions, International Economic Review 13, 568–598.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahn, T., A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper, 1988, “Efficiency Characterizations in Different DEA Models,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 22, 253–257.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold, V., I. Bardhan, W.W. Cooper and A. Gallegos, 1998, “Primal and Dual Optimality in Computer Codes Using Two-Stage Solution Procedures in DEA” in J. Aronson and S. Zionts, eds., Operations Research Methods, Models and Applications (Westpost, Conn: Quorum Books).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Banker, R., A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper, 1984, Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Management Science 30, 1078–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Banker, R.D. and R.C. Morey, 1986a, Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs, Operations Research 34,No. 4, 513–521.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Banker, R.D. and R.C. Morey, 1986b, The use of categorical variables in data envelopment analysis, Management Science 32,No. 12, 1613–1627.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bardhan, I., W.F. Bowlin, W.W. Cooper and T. Sueyoshi, 1996, “Models and Measures for Efficiency Dominance in DEA, Part I: Additive Models and MED Measures,” Journal of the Operational Research Society of Japan 39, 322–332.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Brockett, P.L., A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, Z.M. Huang, and D.B. Sun, 1997, Data transformations in DEA cone ratio envelopment approaches for monitoring bank performances, European Journal of Operational Research 98,No. 2, 250–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brockett, P.L., W.W. Cooper, H.C. Shin and Y. Wang, 1998, Inefficiency and congestion in Chinese production before and after the 1978 economic reforms. Socio-Econ Plann Sci 32, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Charnes, A. and W.W. Cooper, 1962, Programming with linear fractional functionals, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 9, 181–185.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, 1978, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429–444.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Charnes A, C.T. Clark, W.W. Cooper, B. Golany, 1985, A developmental study of data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in the US air forces. In R.G. Thompson and R.M. Thrall, Eds., Annals Of Operation Research 2:95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, DB. Sun, and Z.M. Huang, 1990, Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks, Journal of econometrics 46, 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, Q.L. Wei, and Z.M. Huang, 1989, Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming, International Journal of Systems Science 20, 1099–1118.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Charnes, A. and W.W. Cooper, 1961, Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming, 2 vols., with A. Charnes (New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, B. Golany, L. Seiford and J. Stutz, (1985) “Foundations of Data Envelopment Analysis for Pareto-Koopmans Efficient Empirical Production Functions,” Journal of Econometrics (1985), 30, pp. 91–107.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Cook, W.D., M. Kress, and L.M. Seiford, 1992, Prioritization models for frontier decision making units in DEA, European Journal of Operational Research 59,No. 2, 319–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cooper, W.W., R.G. Thompson, and R.M. Thrall, 1996, Extensions and new developments in data envelopment analysis, Annals of Operations Research 66, 3–45.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M. and Tone, K., 2000, Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M. and Zhu, Joe, A unified additive model approach for evaluating inefficiency and congestion with associated measures in DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 34,No. 1 (2000), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cooper, W.W., H. Deng, Z. M. Huang and S. X. Li, 2002, A one-model approach to congestion in data envelopment analysis, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 36, 231–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cooper, W.W., K.S. Park and J.T. Pastor, 2000, “Marginal Rates and Elasticities of Substitution in DEA.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 13, 2000, pp. 105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cooper, W.W., K.S. Park and J.T. Pastor, 1999, “RAM: A Range Adjusted Measure of Inefficiency for Use with Additive Models and Relations to Other Models and Measures in DEA”, Journal of Productivity Analysis 11, 5–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Debreu, G., 1951, The coefficient of resource utilization, Econometrica 19, 273–292.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Dyson, R.G. and E. Thanassoulis, 1988, Reducing weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis, Journal of the Operational Research Society 39,No. 6, 563–576.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Färe, R., S. Grosskopf and C.A.K. Lovell, 1985, The Measurement of Efficiency of Production. Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Färe, R., S. Grosskopf and CAK Lovell, 1994, Production Frontiers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Farrell, M.J., 1957, The measurement of productive efficiency, Journal of Royal Statistical Society A 120, 253–281.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Koopmans, T.C., 1951, Analysis of Production as an efficient combination of Activities, in T.C. Koopmans, ed. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Roll, Y., W.D. Cook, and B. Golany, 1991, Controlling factor weights in data envelopment analysis, IIE Transactions, 23, 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shephard, R.W., 1970, Theory of Cost and Production Functions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Takamura, T. and K. Tone, 2003, “A Comparative Site Evaluation Study for Relocating Japanese Government Agencies Out of Tokyo,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 37, 85–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tavares, G., 2003, “A Bibliography of Data Envelopment Analysis (1978–2001),” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Thompson, R.G., F.D. Jr. Singleton, R.M. Thrall, and B.A. Smith, 1986, Comparative site evaluation for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas, Interfaces 16, 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Thompson, R.G., L. Langemeier, C. Lee, E. Lee, and R. Thrall, 1990, The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming, Journal of Econometrics 46, 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tone, K. and B.K. Sahoo, 2003, “A Reexamination of Cost Efficiency and Cost Elasticity in DEA,” Management Science (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wong, Y.-H.B. and J.E. Beasley, 1990, Restricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis, Journal of the Operational Research Society 41, 829–835.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhu, J., 1996a, DEA/AR analysis of the 1988–1989 performance of the Nanjing Textiles Corporation, Annals of Operations Research 66, 311–335.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhu, J., 1996b, Data envelopment analysis with preference structure, Journal of the Operational Research Society 47,No. 1, 136–150.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhu, J., 2000, Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies. European Journal of Operational Research 123,No. 1, 105–124.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhu, J. 2002, Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., Zhu, J. (2004). Data Envelopment Analysis. In: Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., Zhu, J. (eds) Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 71. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7798-X_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7798-X_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7797-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-7798-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics