Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
“...Wittgenstein’s new philosophy [after 1933] is...entirely outside any philosophical tradit and without literary sources of influence”, G.H. von Wright, “Biographical Sketch” in Norman Malcolm, Wittgenstein: A Memoir (London: Oxford University Press, 1958), 15.
See, for example, Jerzy Giedymin, “Polish Philosophy in the Inter-War Period and Ludwik Fleck’s Theory of Thought Styles and Thought Collectives”; Boguslaw Wolniewicz, “Ludwik Fleck and Polish Philosophy”; Wladislaw Markiewicz, “Lvów as a Cultural and Intellectual Background of the Genesis of Flack’s Ideas”, Cognition and Fact: Materials on Ludwik Fleck, eds. Robert S. Cohen and Thomas Schnelle (“Boston Studies in Philosophy of Science”, Vol. 87; Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1986), 179–230. I cite this book in parentheses in the text for convenience.
G. H. von Wright, “Wittgenstein in Relation to His Times”, Wittgenstein and His Times, ed. Brian McGuinness (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982), 116.
Rudolf Haller, “War Wittgenstein von Spengler beeinflusst?” Fragen zu Wittgenstein und Aufsätze zur österreichischen Philosophie, (“Studien zur österreichischen Philosophie”, Bd. 10, Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1986), 155–69.
Rafael Ferber, “Wittgenstein und Spengler”, Archiv für die Geschichte der Philosophie Bd. 73,2 (1991), 188–207.
I have presented this in a lecture entitled “How Did Spengler Influence Wittgenstein?” at Roma Tre University in December 2003. See also Allan Janik Assembling Reminders (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; forthcoming [in French]), Ch. 9, “The Morphological Turn”.
Oswald Spengler, Der Untergang des Abendlandes: Umrisse einer Morphologie der Weltgeschichte (Münuch: DTV, 1972), 401. I refer to Spengler hereafter in the text in parentheses.
I have discussed this matter in “Wie hat Schopenhauer Wittgenstein beeinflusst?” Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 73 (1992), 75–6.
See Thomas S. Kuhn, Foreword, Ludwik Fleck, Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, Trans. Fred Bradley and Thaddeus J. Trenn (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979), ix.
Ludwik Fleck, “Some Specific Features of the Medical Way of Thinking”, Cognition and Fact, 39 (see n. 2).
A certain similarity of usage between Fleck, Spengler and Martin Heidegger, in whose Sein und Zeit the notion of Stimmung is inextricably linked to our perceptions of the world, should be noted here. Whether the notion of Stimmung involved in Fleck’s concept of Denkstil owes anything to Heidegger’s usage in Sein und Zeit, (14 Aufl.;Tübingen: Max Niemayer, 1977) § 29; 134–40, is an interesting question; for there seems to be significant parallels in the ways that both Fleck and Heidegger, as well as Spengler, link the formation practical judgment to an ethos.
See Thomas Kuhn’s Foreword to Fleck, n. 9. By the time Prof. Kuhn wrote this he was not particularly clear himself about the “influences” upon his classic The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962) as it became clear to me in conversation with him in 1985. His graciousness in such matters precluded dissimulation.
See Stephen Pepper, World Hypotheses (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1942).
See Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964).
See Ronald H. Bray, “Form and Cause in Goethe’s Morphology”, in Frederick Amrine, Francis J. Zucker and Harvey Wheeler (eds.) Goethe and the Sciences: A Re-appraisal (“Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science” Vol. 97; Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987), 257–300.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Janik, A. (2006). Notes on the Origins of Fleck’s Concept of “Denkstil”. In: Galavotti, M.C. (eds) Cambridge and Vienna. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook [2004], vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4101-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4101-2_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4100-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4101-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)