A Moral Defense of Recreational Drug Use

  • Authors
  • Rob Lovering

Table of contents

  1. Front Matter
    Pages i-x
  2. Rob Lovering
    Pages 1-32
  3. Rob Lovering
    Pages 33-65
  4. Rob Lovering
    Pages 67-92
  5. Rob Lovering
    Pages 93-126
  6. Rob Lovering
    Pages 127-148
  7. Rob Lovering
    Pages 149-162
  8. Rob Lovering
    Pages 163-168
  9. Back Matter
    Pages 169-218

About this book


Why does American law allow the recreational use of some drugs, such as alcohol, tobacco, and caffeine, but not others, such as marijuana, cocaine, and heroin? The answer lies not simply in the harm the use of these drugs might cause, but in the perceived morality—or lack thereof—of their recreational use. Despite strong rhetoric from moral critics of recreational drug use, however, it is surprisingly difficult to discern the reasons they have for deeming the recreational use of (some) drugs morally wrong. In this book, Rob Lovering lays out and dissects various arguments for the immorality of using marijuana, cocaine, heroin, and other drugs recreationally. He contends that, by and large, these arguments do not succeed. Lovering’s book represents one of the first works to systematically present, analyze, and critique arguments for the moral wrongness of recreational drug use. Given this, as well as the popularity of the morality-based defense of the United States’ drug laws, this book is an important and timely contribution to the debate on the recreational use of drugs.


Drug(s) recreational drug use ethics morality moral status morally wrong harm-based non-harm-based brain damage drug-related deaths drug-related crimes legalism blocking basic goods instrumentalize instrumentalization drug addiction degradation undignified goal unearned pleasure unnatural drug Moral types

Bibliographic information