Advertisement

Brute Force

Cracking the Data Encryption Standard

  • Matt Curtin

Table of contents

  1. Front Matter
    Pages i-x
  2. Pages 1-2
  3. Pages 3-10
  4. Pages 23-35
  5. Pages 37-40
  6. Pages 41-47
  7. Pages 49-55
  8. Pages 57-62
  9. Pages 63-73
  10. Pages 75-76
  11. Pages 77-84
  12. Pages 85-90
  13. Pages 91-96
  14. Pages 97-112
  15. Pages 113-119
  16. Pages 121-125
  17. Pages 127-134
  18. Pages 135-138
  19. Pages 139-140
  20. Pages 141-150
  21. Pages 151-157
  22. Pages 159-162
  23. Pages 163-164
  24. Pages 165-167
  25. Pages 169-173
  26. Pages 175-187
  27. Pages 189-197
  28. Pages 199-206
  29. Pages 207-211
  30. Pages 213-214
  31. Pages 215-227
  32. Pages 235-238
  33. Pages 239-240
  34. Pages 241-247
  35. Pages 249-254
  36. Pages 255-257
  37. Pages 267-270
  38. Pages 271-273
  39. Pages 275-281
  40. Back Matter
    Pages 283-291

About this book

Introduction

In the 1960s, it became increasingly clear that more and more information was going to be stored on computers, not on pieces of paper. With these changes in technology and the ways it was used came a need to protect both the systems and the information. For the next ten years, encryption systems of varying strengths were developed, but none proved to be rigorous enough. In 1973, the NBS put out an open call for a new, stronger encryption system that would become the new federal standard. Several years later, IBM responded with a system called Lucifer that came to simply be known as DES (data encryption standard).

The strength of an encryption system is best measured by the attacks it is able to withstand, and because DES was the federal standard, many tried to test its limits. (It should also be noted that a number of cryptographers and computer scientists told the NSA that DES was not nearly strong enough and would be easily hacked.) Rogue hackers, usually out to steal as much information as possible, tried to break DES. A number of "white hat" hackers also tested the system and reported on their successes. Still others attacked DES because they believed it had outlived its effectiveness and was becoming increasingly vulnerable. The sum total of these efforts to use all of the possible keys to break DES over time made for a brute force attack.

In 1996, the supposedly uncrackable DES was broken. In this captivating and intriguing book, Matt Curtin charts DES’s rise and fall and chronicles the efforts of those who were determined to master it.

Keywords

code cryptography data encryption encryption hacking information technology

Authors and affiliations

  • Matt Curtin
    • 1
  1. 1.Interhack CorporationUSA

Bibliographic information