Skip to main content
Book cover

Gender in Philosophy and Law

  • Book
  • © 2013

Overview

  • Reconstructs the origin of the sex/gender debate and the phases of theorization through a systematic, interdisciplinary approach
  • Provides a conceptual clarification of a complex debate, enabling the reader to understand and acquire a critical awareness of delicate and relevant issues
  • Critically analyses of the evolution of sex/gender law within an international framework?
  • Includes supplementary material: sn.pub/extras

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Law (BRIEFSLAW)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (4 chapters)

Keywords

About this book

This book is an introductory systematic framework in the complex and interdisciplinary sex/gender debate, focusing on philosophy of law.The volume analyses the different theories that have dealt with the gender category, highlighting the conceptual premises and the arguments of the most influential theories in the debate, which have had repercussions on the field of the ethical and juridical debate (with reference to intersexuality, transsexualism, transgender, homosexuality). The aim is to offer a sort of conceptual orientation in the complexity of the debate, in an effort to identify the various aspects and development processes of  the theories, so as to highlight the conceptual elements of the theorisations to grasp the problem areas within them. It is therefore an overall synthetic and also explicative analysis, but not only explicative: the aim is to outline the arguments supporting the different theories and the counter-arguments too, for the purpose of proposing categories to weigh up the elements and to take one’s own critical stance, with a methodological style that is neither descriptive nor prescriptive, but critical. ​      

Authors and Affiliations

  • , Faculty of Law, Lumsa University, Rome, Rome, Italy

    Laura Palazzani

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us