Deaf Rhetoric

1. Front Matter

   Pages i-xxv

   PDF

2. Deaf People and Healthcare Communication

   • Manako Yabe

   Pages 1-16

3. What Is an Ecology of Health Communication?

   • Manako Yabe

   Pages 17-28

4. Deaf and Hard of Hearing Patients’ Perspectives

   • Manako Yabe

   Pages 29-37

5. Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives

   • Manako Yabe

   Pages 39-47

6. Conclusion and Implications

   • Manako Yabe

   Pages 49-52

7. Back Matter

   Pages 53-55

   PDF

This book guides healthcare professionals, hospital administrators, and medical interpreters in the United States (and internationally) in ways to better communicate with Deaf and Hard of Hearing (D/HH) patients and sign language interpreters in healthcare settings. It also provides an overview of the healthcare communication issues with healthcare professionals and D/HH patients, and the advantages and disadvantages of using in-person interpreters vs. video remote interpreting (VRI). Due to technology development, hospital administrators have popularized the use of VRI and reduced the number of in-person interpreting services, which have negatively affected the quality of medical interpreting services and patient-provider communication. The COVID-19 pandemic also has accelerated the move toward more VRI, particularly in the US.

The book addresses an understudied aspect of access and is written by an international deaf researcher from Japan who uses American Sign Language(ASL) and English as non-native languages. In order to identify appropriate interpreting services for specific treatments, the author focuses on healthcare professionals' and D/HH patients' interpreting preferences for critical and non-critical care in the US, and offers a new theoretical framework, an Ecology of Health Communication, to contextualize and analyze these preferences. The ecological matrix and its five analytical dimensions (i.e., physical-material, psychological, social, spatial, and temporal) allow readers to understand how these dimensions influence healthcare professionals' and D/HH patients' interpreting preferences as well as the treatment outcomes. This book concludes by prioritizing the use of an appropriate interpreter for specific treatments and allocating funds for in-person interpreters for critical care treatments.

Deaf Rhetoric: An Ecology of Health Communication is primarily designed for healthcare professional students and professionals, hospital administrators, medical interpreters, VRI companies, and healthcare researchers. Scholars interested in the communication preferences of healthcare professionals and deaf people also will find this text useful. The book counters some of the power differences between healthcare providers and those who use medical services, and subtly reminds others that deaf people are not solely the receivers of medical care but actually are full people. The field of health care is growing and medical schools are increasingly called on to address cultural competencies; this resource provides a needed intervention.

• healthcare communications
• deaf studies
• patient-provider communication
• video remote interpreting
• deaf patients
• healthcare professionals
• medical interpreters
• in-person interpreting
• hospital administration
• ecology of health communication
• health services research
• disabilities and accommodation
• hearing loss
• storytelling
• mixed methods research
• sign language

• Faculty of Human Sciences, Division of Disability Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

  Manako Yabe

​Manako Yabe, PhD, MSW is the first Deaf faculty member in the Division of Disability Sciences at the University of Tsukuba, Japan. Dr. Yabe was born deaf in Japan and grew up in three countries: Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. She earned a Bachelor of Arts in Deaf Studies from California State University, Northridge, a Master’s in Social Work from the University of Southern California, and a Doctor of Philosophy in Disability Studies from the University of Illinois, Chicago. Her areas of specialization include: Technical Communication, Deaf Studies, Disability Studies, Disability Rhetoric, Writing Center Studies, and Mixed Methods Research.

Policies and ethics