“Erforth makes a notable contribution to our understanding of foreign policy decisionmaking. He convincingly demonstrates that pre-defined conceptions of national interest cannot explain French interventions in Mali and the Central African Republic. They were the result of competition among actors with different mental maps and belief systems who exploited as best they could the process by which decisions are reached. In the end the Hollande administration saved ‘strangers’ to uphold its self-image.” (Richard Ned Lebow, FBA, Professor of International Political Theory, King's College London, UK)
“Despite repeated assurances that France would not intervene, that the days of France acting as the 'gendarme of Africa' were over, President Hollande launched two major military interventions in Africa in 2013, the first in Mali and the second in the Central African Republic. Erforth's analysis of the institutional setting within which these operations were launched, combined with a detailed exploration of the mindsets of those politicians, civil servants, and military leaders who are the makers of France’s military actions in Africa, throws new light on the decision-making processes that led to their launch. He also shows how the dominant narrative of global terrorism, together with a discourse about the countries' proximity of Europe, became powerful drivers of interventionism. As such, Erforth's book makes an important and innovative contribution not only to the policy-making process that led to the launch of these two operations, but more broadly to our understanding of recent developments in French African policy.” (Tony Chafer, Professor of French and African Studies, University of Portsmouth, UK)
“Erforth spins a fascinating tale of Francois Hollande’s interventions in Mali and CAR, showing how a strategic narrative emerged through concern for such disparate principles as legitimacy, responsibility, guilt, compassion, security, prestige, honor, memory, analogies, and self-image. In doing so, he not only adds to our understandings of these particular interventions, but shows how simultaneous attention to both process and ideation can aid theoretical development in Foreign Policy Analysis.” (Valerie M. Hudson, Professor and George H. W. Bush Chair, Department of International Affairs, Texas A&M University, USA)