Advertisement

Mathematical Astronomy in Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus

Part 2

  • N. M. Swerdlow
  • O. Neugebauer

Part of the Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences book series (HISTORY, volume 10)

Table of contents

  1. Front Matter
    Pages i-xvi
  2. Part 1

    1. Front Matter
      Pages xvii-xvii
    2. N. M. Swerdlow, O. Neugebauer
      Pages 1-95
    3. N. M. Swerdlow, O. Neugebauer
      Pages 97-123
    4. N. M. Swerdlow, O. Neugebauer
      Pages 125-190
    5. N. M. Swerdlow, O. Neugebauer
      Pages 191-286
    6. N. M. Swerdlow, O. Neugebauer
      Pages 287-479
    7. N. M. Swerdlow, O. Neugebauer
      Pages 481-537
  3. Part 2

    1. Front Matter
      Pages 538-538
    2. N. M. Swerdlow, O. Neugebauer
      Pages 539-541
    3. N. M. Swerdlow, O. Neugebauer
      Pages 543-547
    4. N. M. Swerdlow, O. Neugebauer
      Pages 549-559
    5. N. M. Swerdlow, O. Neugebauer
      Pages 561-691
  4. Back Matter
    Pages 693-711

About this book

Introduction

When I first laid out the framework for A History of Ancient Mathe­ matical Astronomy, I intended to carry the discussion down to the last applications of Greek astronomical methodology, i. e. Copernicus, Brahe, and Kepler. But as the work proceeded, it became evident that this plan was much too ambitious, and so I decided to terminate my History with late antiquity, well before Islam. Nevertheless, I did not discard the running commentary that I had prepared when studying De revolutionibus in its relation to the methodology of the Almagest. Only recently, E. S. Kennedy and his collaborators had opened access to the" Maragha School" (mainly Ibn ash-Shalir), revealing close parallels to Copernicus's procedures. Accordingly, it seemed useful to make available a modern analysis of De revolutionibus, and thus in 1975 I prepared for publication "Notes on Copernicus. " In the meantime, however, Noel Swerdlow, also starting from Greek astronomy, not only extended his work into a deep analysis of De revolu­ tionibus, but also systematically investigated its sources and predecessors (Peurbach, Regiomontanus, etc. ). I was aware of these studies through his publications as well as from numerous conversations on the subject at The Institute for Advanced Study and at Brown University. It became clear to me that my own investigations lay at too superficial a level, and I therefore withdrew my manuscript and suggested to Swerdlow that he undertake a thoroughgoing revision and amplification of my "Notes. " His acceptance of my proposal initiated the present publication.

Keywords

Astronomy Calculation Copernicus Derivation equation theorem

Authors and affiliations

  • N. M. Swerdlow
    • 1
  • O. Neugebauer
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Astronomy and AstrophysicsUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of the History of MathematicsBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Bibliographic information

  • DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8262-1
  • Copyright Information Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1984
  • Publisher Name Springer, New York, NY
  • eBook Packages Springer Book Archive
  • Print ISBN 978-1-4613-8264-5
  • Online ISBN 978-1-4613-8262-1
  • Series Print ISSN 0172-570X
  • Buy this book on publisher's site