Advertisement

British Upper Carboniferous Stratigraphy

  • C. J. Cleal
  • B. A. Thomas

Part of the The Geological Conservation Review Series book series (EPPS)

Table of contents

  1. Front Matter
    Pages i-xiii
  2. C. J. Cleal, B. A. Thomas
    Pages 1-13
  3. C. J. Cleal, B. A. Thomas
    Pages 15-36
  4. C. J. Cleal, B. A. Thomas
    Pages 37-55
  5. C. J. Cleal, B. A. Thomas
    Pages 57-107
  6. C. J. Cleal, B. A. Thomas
    Pages 109-120
  7. C. J. Cleal, B. A. Thomas
    Pages 121-130
  8. C. J. Cleal, B. A. Thomas
    Pages 131-157
  9. C. J. Cleal, B. A. Thomas
    Pages 159-164
  10. C. J. Cleal, B. A. Thomas
    Pages 165-201
  11. C. J. Cleal, B. A. Thomas
    Pages 203-240
  12. C. J. Cleal, B. A. Thomas
    Pages 241-262
  13. C. J. Cleal, B. A. Thomas
    Pages 263-286
  14. Back Matter
    Pages 287-339

About this book

Introduction

This volume summarizes the results of a survey of British Upper Carboniferous sites, undertaken between 1978 and 1990 as part of the Geological Conservation Review (GCR). The GCR was the first attempt to assess the scientific significance of all Britain's geological sites and has proved a landmark in the development of a coherent geological conservation strategy in this country. To ensure that the assessments were based on a firm logical and scientific foundation, the range of scientific interest was divided into ninety-seven discrete subject 'blocks', reflecting the natural divisions of stratigraphy, palaeogeography and geological process; Westphalian stratigraphy and Namurian stratigraphy were two of these blocks. The first stage in the survey was a review of the literature, to establish a compre­ hensive database of sites. From this, a provisional list of potentially significant sites was made and this was circulated to all relevant specialists in this country and abroad. At the same time, the sites were visited to assess their physical condition and whether the interest was still extant. In some cases, excavation (so-called 'site-cleaning') was carried out to see if the interest of a site could be resurrected or enhanced. The com­ ments made by the specialists and the field observations were then used to produce a second site list, which again was circulated for comment.

Keywords

Carboniferous stratigraphy

Authors and affiliations

  • C. J. Cleal
    • 1
  • B. A. Thomas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyNational Museum of WalesCardiffUK

Bibliographic information

  • DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0587-3
  • Copyright Information Joint Nature Conservation Committee 1996
  • Publisher Name Springer, Dordrecht
  • eBook Packages Springer Book Archive
  • Print ISBN 978-94-010-4260-4
  • Online ISBN 978-94-011-0587-3
  • Buy this book on publisher's site