Advertisement

A Philosophy of Human Hope

  • Joseph J. Godfrey
Book

Part of the Studies in Philosophy and Religion book series (STPAR, volume 9)

Table of contents

  1. Front Matter
    Pages I-XIII
  2. Introduction

    1. Joseph J. Godfrey
      Pages 1-4
  3. Analysis of Hope

    1. Front Matter
      Pages 5-5
    2. Joseph J. Godfrey
      Pages 7-9
    3. Joseph J. Godfrey
      Pages 11-14
    4. Joseph J. Godfrey
      Pages 15-24
    5. Joseph J. Godfrey
      Pages 25-27
    6. Joseph J. Godfrey
      Pages 29-32
    7. Joseph J. Godfrey
      Pages 33-35
    8. Joseph J. Godfrey
      Pages 37-46
    9. Joseph J. Godfrey
      Pages 47-49
  4. Ultimate Hope and Fundamental Hope

    1. Front Matter
      Pages 51-53
    2. Joseph J. Godfrey
      Pages 83-101
    3. Joseph J. Godfrey
      Pages 103-131
  5. Ontologies, Implications, and Theism

    1. Front Matter
      Pages n1-n1
    2. Joseph J. Godfrey
      Pages 155-168
    3. Joseph J. Godfrey
      Pages 169-190
    4. Joseph J. Godfrey
      Pages 191-196
    5. Joseph J. Godfrey
      Pages 197-206
    6. Joseph J. Godfrey
      Pages 207-213
    7. Joseph J. Godfrey
      Pages 215-221
    8. Joseph J. Godfrey
      Pages 223-248
  6. Back Matter
    Pages 249-272

About this book

Introduction

Few reference works in philosophy have articles on hope. Few also are systematic or large-scale philosophical studies of hope. Hope is admitted to be important in people's lives, but as a topic for study, hope has largely been left to psychologists and theologians. For the most part philosophers treat hope en passant. My aim is to outline a general theory of hope, to explore its structure, forms, goals, reasonableness, and implications, and to trace the implications of such a theory for atheism or theism. What has been written is quite disparate. Some see hope in an individualistic, often existential, way, and some in a social and political way. Hope is proposed by some as essentially atheistic, and by others as incomprehensible outside of one or another kind of theism. Is it possible to think consistently and at the same time comprehensively about the phenomenon of human hoping? Or is it several phenomena? How could there be such diverse understandings of so central a human experience? On what rational basis could people differ over whether hope is linked to God? What I offer here is a systematic analysis, but one worked out in dialogue with Ernst Bloch, Immanuel Kant, and Gabriel Marcel. Ernst Bloch of course was a Marxist and officially an atheist, Gabriel Marcel a Christian theist, and Immanuel Kant was a theist, but not in a conventional way.

Keywords

15th century Immanuel Kant bibliography body causality dialogue experience history model philosophy sound structure subject theology trust

Editors and affiliations

  • Joseph J. Godfrey
    • 1
  1. 1.Saint Joseph’s UniversityUSA

Bibliographic information

  • DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3499-3
  • Copyright Information Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1987
  • Publisher Name Springer, Dordrecht
  • eBook Packages Springer Book Archive
  • Print ISBN 978-90-247-3354-5
  • Online ISBN 978-94-009-3499-3
  • Buy this book on publisher's site