Moral Theory and Moral Judgments in Medical Ethics

  • Baruch A. Brody

Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 32)

Table of contents

  1. Front Matter
    Pages i-vi
  2. Introduction — Moral Theory and Moral Judgments in Biomedical Ethics

  3. Deriving Utilitarian Consequences

  4. Natural Right Casuistry

    1. Front Matter
      Pages 55-55
    2. Eric Mack
      Pages 57-74
    3. Bart K. Gruzalski
      Pages 75-85
  5. Marx’s Theory: Deriving Moral Implications

    1. Front Matter
      Pages 99-99
    2. Allen Buchanan
      Pages 101-118
  6. Christian Casuistry

  7. From Theory to Praxis

    1. Front Matter
      Pages 169-169
    2. Carson Strong
      Pages 193-211
    3. Philip E. Devine
      Pages 213-223
  8. Back Matter
    Pages 225-232

About this book


principles. A second solution to this problem is to develop a scale for weighing the significance of the conflicting principles in a given case and for concluding which action should be adopted because it is supported by the weightier considerations in that case. Such a solution seems more realistic than the lexical ordering approach, but the development of such a scale is a problematic task. Still other, more complex solutions are possible. Which is the best solution to this problem of conflicting principles of bioethics? We need a moral theory to answer that question. This is the first reason for concluding that the principles of bioethics are not the true foundations of justified judgment in bioethics. What is the problem of the unclear scope and implications of the principles of bioethics and how can an appeal to moral theory help deal with that problem? The scope of a bioethical principle is the range of cases in which it applies. The implications of a bioethical principle are the conclusions to be derived from that principle in those cases in which it applies. It is clear from a review of the discussions in bioethics that there are major unclarities about the scope and implications of each of the principles. Consider, for example, the principle of autonomy.


Biomedical ethics Medical Ethics Utilitarianism ethics moral judgments morality

Editors and affiliations

  • Baruch A. Brody
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Ethics, Medicine, and Public IssuesHoustonUSA

Bibliographic information

  • DOI
  • Copyright Information Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1988
  • Publisher Name Springer, Dordrecht
  • eBook Packages Springer Book Archive
  • Print ISBN 978-94-010-7723-1
  • Online ISBN 978-94-009-2715-5
  • Series Print ISSN 0376-7418
  • Buy this book on publisher's site