About this book
This volume presents a variety of both normative and descriptive perspectives on the use of precedent by the United States Supreme Court. It brings together a diverse group of American legal scholars, some of whom have been influenced by the Segal/Spaeth "attitudinal" model and some of whom have not. The group of contributors includes legal theorists and empiricists, constitutional lawyers and legal generalists, leading authorities and up-and-coming scholars. The book addresses questions such as how the Court establishes durable precedent, how the Court decides to overrule precedent, the effects of precedent on case selection, the scope of constitutional precedent, the influence of concurrences and dissents, and the normative foundations of constitutional precedent. Most of these questions have been addressed by the Court itself only obliquely, if at all. The volume will be valuable to readers both in the United States and abroad, particularly in light of ongoing debates over the role of precedent in civil-law nations and emerging legal systems.
Barriers to Group Formation on the Supreme Court Constitutional Interpretation Constitutional Stare Decisis as Dispute Resolution Decisis and the Selection Effect Dialectic of Stare Decisis Doctrine Due Process Clause in the US Constitution Due Process Clause of the Constitution Epistemic Defense of Precedent Group Formation and Precedent Judicial Precedent in the USA Methodological Stare Decisis Normative Foundations Of Constitutional Precedent Normative Foundations of Constitutional Precedent Normative Foundations of Constitutional Precedent Overruling Constitutional Precedents Overruling Constitutional Precedents Precedent on the United States Supreme Court Private Rights Litigation Scope of Constitutional Precedent United States Supreme Court onstitutional Precedent and The Adjudicative Process
Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013
Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
Series Print ISSN
Series Online ISSN
Buy this book on publisher's site