Assessment of the Nuclear Programs of Iran and North Korea

  • Jungmin Kang

Table of contents

  1. Front Matter
    Pages i-xii
  2. North Korea

  3. Iran

  4. North Korea: Iran Connection

    1. Front Matter
      Pages 113-113
  5. Back Matter
    Pages 129-131

About this book


When we are looking at proliferation cases, there are a number of lessons – positive and negative – learnt. First, facts reported by the IAEA are essential for the international community in assessing the compliance and risks of possible clandestine activities. Second, the IAEA verification scheme is biting when it fully exercises its verification rights, and when it is provided with the requisite cooperation. Third, when countries face questions raised by the IAEA, those that chose to turn the course and / or cooperated to remove concerns and ambiguities resolved their nuclear dossiers in a satisfactory manner and fairly swiftly. Fourth, when states adopt the course of confrontation, as are currently the cases with Iran, Syria and North Korea, the situation becomes more complicated and more difficult to resolve. Fifth, dragging non-compliance and challenging of the authority of the United Nations Security Council and the IAEA Board of Governors erodes the international non-proliferation regime.
This book addresses two proliferation cases, Iran and North Korea providing extensive snapshots on the currently known nuclear programs, and analyses failures and weaknesses of past verification activities, and makes innovative suggestions for ways forward.


Ballistic Missile Development Graphite Isotope Ratio Method IAEA Iran’s Nuclear Program Nuclear Developments in North Korea Nuclear Nonproliferation Plutonium-Production Declaration Tehran Research Reactor Verification Nuclear Treaties Yongbyon Plutonium Facilities

Editors and affiliations

  • Jungmin Kang
    • 1
  1. 1., Lee Byong Whi Nuclear Energy Policy CentKorea Advanced Institute of Science andDaejeonKorea, Republic of (South Korea)

Bibliographic information