Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs

  • Gregor┬áBetz

Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 357)

Table of contents

  1. Front Matter
    Pages i-x
  2. Gregor Betz
    Pages 1-31
  3. Why DoWe Agree? On the Consensus-Conduciveness of Controversial Argumentation

  4. How DoWe Know? On the Truth-Conduciveness of Controversial Argumentation

  5. Back Matter
    Pages 247-255

About this book

Introduction

Is critical argumentation an effective way to overcome disagreement? And does the exchange of arguments bring opponents in a controversy closer to the truth? This study provides a new perspective on these pivotal questions. By means of multi-agent simulations, it investigates the truth- and consensus-conduciveness of controversial debates.

The book brings together research in formal epistemology and argumentation theory. Besides its consequences for discursive practice, the work may have important implications for philosophy of science and the way we construe scientific rationality, as well.

Keywords

Argumentation Debate Consensus Debate Controversy Debate Simulation Debate Truth Debate

Authors and affiliations

  • Gregor┬áBetz
    • 1
  1. 1., Institute of PhilosophyKarlsruhe Institute of TechnologyKarlsruheGermany

Bibliographic information

  • DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4599-5
  • Copyright Information Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013
  • Publisher Name Springer, Dordrecht
  • eBook Packages Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
  • Print ISBN 978-94-007-4598-8
  • Online ISBN 978-94-007-4599-5
  • About this book