Science and Human Freedom

  • Michael Esfeld

Table of contents

  1. Front Matter
    Pages i-xv
  2. Back Matter
    Pages 163-189

About this book


This book argues for two claims: firstly, determinism in science does not infringe upon human free will because it is descriptive, not prescriptive, and secondly, the very formulation, testing and justification of scientific theories presupposes human free will and thereby persons as ontologically primitive. The argument against predetermination is broadly Humean, or more precisely ‘Super-Humean’, whereas that against naturalist reduction is in large Kantian, drawing from Sellars on the scientific and the manifest image.  Thus, whilst the book defends scientific realism against the confusion between fact and fake, it also reveals why scientific theories, laws and explanations cannot succeed in imposing norms for our actions upon us, neither on the level of the individual nor on that of society.

Esfeld makes a strong case for an ontology of science that is minimally sufficient to explain our scientific and common sense knowledge, not only removing the concern that the laws of nature are incompatible with human freedom, but furthermore showing how our freedom is in fact a very presupposition for science.


Determinism Free will Hume Sellars Scientific Realism determinism Kant ontology of science predetermination naturalistic reduction

Authors and affiliations

  • Michael Esfeld
    • 1
  1. 1.Section de PhilosophieUniversity of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Bibliographic information

  • DOI
  • Copyright Information The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
  • Publisher Name Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
  • eBook Packages Religion and Philosophy
  • Print ISBN 978-3-030-37770-0
  • Online ISBN 978-3-030-37771-7
  • Buy this book on publisher's site