The Analysis, Communication, and Perception of Risk

  • B. John Garrick
  • Willard C. Gekler

Part of the Advances in Risk Analysis book series (AIRA, volume 9)

Table of contents

  1. Front Matter
    Pages i-xi
  2. Louis Anthony Cox Jr.
    Pages 1-13
  3. Krishna Nand, Bruno I. Loran
    Pages 43-49
  4. J. William Hirzy, Rufus Morison
    Pages 51-61
  5. B. W. Greenwood, J. M. Hudson, A. I. Bodner
    Pages 63-76
  6. Susan H. Youngren, Nancy J. Rachman, Duncan Turnbull
    Pages 77-86
  7. Serdar Uckun, Benoit M. Dawant, Kazuhiko Kawamura
    Pages 87-92
  8. Vicki M. Bier, Ali Mosleh
    Pages 93-104
  9. A. B. Chandler, C. L. Fordham
    Pages 145-152
  10. Ram B. Kulkarni, Barney P. Popkin
    Pages 153-161
  11. W. S. Roesener, A. J. Wolford, C. L. Atwood
    Pages 175-188
  12. Teresa A. Schuller, Denice H. Wardrop, Marilyn Hewitt
    Pages 189-197
  13. Mary R. English
    Pages 199-205
  14. Bruce E. Tonn, Richard T. Goeltz, Cheryl B. Travis, Raymond H. Phillippi
    Pages 213-227
  15. Tamara L. Sorell
    Pages 229-235
  16. Lawrence B. Gratt, Willard R. Chappell
    Pages 237-245
  17. Ad Hoc Study Group on Risk Assessment Presentation, Fred D. Hoerger
    Pages 247-256
  18. Sara Hoover, Lauren Zeise, Gail Krowech
    Pages 257-266
  19. L. Zeise, P. Painter, P. E. Berteau, A. M. Fan, R. J. Jackson
    Pages 275-284
  20. L. James Valverde A. Jr.
    Pages 305-314
  21. Edward Gordon
    Pages 315-320
  22. Dennis S. Mileti, Barbara C. Farhar, Colleen Fitzpatrick, Steven G. Helmericks
    Pages 321-334
  23. Stuart W. Katzke
    Pages 361-374
  24. Robert G. Black, James Cummings-Saxton, Robert E. Unsworth, Brian E. Julius, Janet A. Gochman, Frederick W. Talcott
    Pages 385-388
  25. J. A. Mahaffey, J. R. Johnson, C. L. Sanders
    Pages 401-410
  26. Jason H. Goodfriend, Julia Pet-Edwards
    Pages 421-428
  27. F. Reed Johnson
    Pages 441-450
  28. A. M. Rulis, P. J. McLaughlin, P. A. Salsbury, G. H. Pauli
    Pages 485-493

About this book


The 1989 Annual Meeting of the Society for Risk Analysis dramatically demonstrated one of the most important reasons for having the Society - to bring together people with highly diverse backgrounds and disciplines to assess the common problems of societal and individual risks. The physical scientists emphasized the analytical tools for assessing environmental effects and for modeling risks from engineered systems and other human activities. The health scientists presented numerous methods of analyzing health effects, including the subject of dose-response relationships, especially at low exposure levels - never an easy analysis. The social and political scientists concentrated on issues of risk perception, communication, acceptability, and human touch. Others discussed such issues as cost-benefit analysis and the risk-based approach to decision analysis. Use of risk assessment methods for risk management continued to be a matter of strong opinion and debate. The impacts of state and federal regulations, existing and planned, were assessed in sessions and in luncheon speeches. These impacts show that risk analysis practitioners will have an increasingly important role in the future. They will be challenged to provide clear, easily understood evaluations of risk that are responsive to society's concern for risk, as evidenced in laws and regulations. Of course, the various risk analysis specialties overlapped in domains of interest.


Assessment Public Health development organization pesticide public health policy screening

Editors and affiliations

  • B. John Garrick
    • 1
  • Willard C. Gekler
    • 1
  1. 1.PLG, Inc.Newport BeachUSA

Bibliographic information